Full Paper
PANF-PA body extended obviously, and the surface of the
PANF-PA was thickly dotted with scarring (Figure 2b). With
each sequential modification or utilization, the surface of the
fiber samples became increasingly coarser, especially PANF-
PA[BnBr]-1 (Figure 2d) and PANF-PA[BnBr]-6 (Figure 2e), which
provided further evidence that some of the insoluble humins
were adsorbed to the surface of the fiber promoter. However,
the overall integrity of the fiber was untouched. This means
that PANF possesses good properties for PANF-PA[BnBr] as
a promoter in the conversion of sucrose into HMF.
water to the system may impede the coordination ability of
chromium with glucose, which would then reduce the forma-
tion of HMF from a glucose unit. Sucrose is a disaccharide con-
sisting of glucose and fructose linked by a glycosidic bond,
and the glycosidic bond can be easily hydrolyzed by an acid
catalyst. Besides, porous coordination polymers with acid
groups showed high conversion of glucose into fructose.[32]
Thus, acidic functional fibers were added into the system to
test the effect for the dehydration of sucrose. Polyacrylonitrile
fiber-supported poly(ammonium hydrochloride)s (PANF-
PA[HCl], Table 2, entry 7) and poly(ammonium hydrobromide)s
(PANF-PA[HBr], Table 2, entry 8) were used first. The results
show that both fiber promoters were active for this conversion,
and the yields increased to 46.9% and 54.1%, respectively.
Based on these results, the use of another two functional
fibers, PANF-supported poly(benzylammonium chloride)s
(PANF-PA[BnCl], Table 2, entry 9) and PANF-PA[BnBr] (Table 2,
entry 10) was examined. Gratifyingly, the yields of HMF in-
creased to 48.3% and 55.6%, respectively. Moreover, it is
worth noting that the functional fibers with the bromide ions
were more effective than those with the chloride ions. As dis-
cussed in our previous work,[23] bromide, which offers the opti-
mal balance between coordination ability and nucleophilicity,
is more effective as an ionic additive than chloride for the iso-
merization of glucose to fructose. These results are in agree-
ment with the halide effect reported by Binder.[29] As PANF-
PA[BnBr] afforded the best result it was used for further optimi-
zation. Next, the influence of the catalyst dosage (Table 2 en-
tries 11–14) and promoter loading (Table 2 entries 15–18) were
examined concisely. It was found that 15 mol% of SnCl4 with
20 mol% promoter loading gave the best result, affording
HMF in a yield of 62.1% (Table 2 entry 17).
Application of the fiber promoters for the conversion of su-
crose into HMF
Screening the fiber promoters for the dehydration of su-
crose to HMF. Water is the most clean and abundant solvent
for organic reactions, and sucrose is particularly soluble in
water, so the investigation of water as a co-solvent for the pro-
duction of HMF from sucrose is worthwhile.[27,28] Metal chlor-
[31]
ides such as CrCl3,[22,29] SnCl4,[21] AlCl3,[30] and FeCl3 are com-
monly used for glucose isomerization to fructose and have
been verified to be efficient for the dehydration of sugars.
Based on our previous work[23] and with the object of convert-
ing sucrose into HMF in mixed-aqueous systems, we first
screened a series of metal chlorides for this transformation in
a mixed water/DMAc solvent (DMAc has been verified to be
the most efficient solvent for sucrose dehydration[23,29]). As can
be seen from Table 2 (entries 1–6), at 10 mol% (based on the
substrate), CrCl3·6H2O, SnCl4·5H2O (abbreviated as SnCl4 in the
following), SnCl2·2H2O, and AlCl3·6H2O were all active. In partic-
ular, SnCl4 was the most efficient and was selected as the cata-
lyst for further study. Although CrCl3·6H2O has been verified to
be the most efficient catalyst in a previous work,[23] addition of
HMF can be isolated by extraction with various organic sol-
vents, such as methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK),[2,33] 2-
butanol,[12] ethyl acetate,[34] diethyl ether,[10,35] and tol-
uene.[36] Here we chose a multiphase system includ-
Table 2. Optimization of the conversion of sucrose into HMF using the functional
fibers as the promoter.[a]
ing an aqueous phase modified with DMAc and or-
ganic solvents to further verify the promoting activity
of PANF-PA[BnBr] (Table 3). Based on our previous
work[24], MIBK was first selected as the extractant for
this attempt (Table 3, entry 1). Using a mixture of
MIBK/water/DMAc (2:3:5, v/v/v), the yield of HMF in-
creased to 68.2%. Encouraged by this good result,
we examined other organic solvents in further tests.
Extractants such as esters or toluene were not very
efficient for this dehydration (Table 3, entries 2–4),
while alcohols also had a positive effect on this trans-
formation (Table 2, entries 5–7). Finally, the mixed-
aqueous system composed of MIBK/water/DMAc was
selected to be further tested (Table 3, entries 8–16).
After further optimization of the composition of sol-
vent and the reaction time, the results show that the
MIBK/water/DMAc mixture at the ratio of 3:2:5 (v/v/
v) at a reaction time of 2.5 h gave the highest yield
of 72.8% (Table 3, entry 15). Moreover, the promoter
PANF-PA[HBr] was also investigated under the opti-
mized conditions; however, no higher yield of HMF
Entry Cat.
Catalyst
loading [mol%]
Promoter
Promoter
loading [mol%]
Yield [%][b]
1
2
CrCl3·6H2O 10
SnCl4·5H2O 10
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10
10
19.9
30.2
12.5
traces
traces
14.7
46.9
54.1
48.3
55.6
36.6
44.5
58.7
58.9
46.4
60.7
62.1
61.4
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SnCl2·2H2O 10
CuCl2·2H2O 10
FeCl3·6H2O 10
AlCl3·6H2O 10
SnCl4·5H2O 10
SnCl4·5H2O 10
SnCl4·5H2O 10
SnCl4·5H2O 10
PANF-PA[HCl]
PANF-PA[HBr]
PANF-PA[BnCl] 10
PANF-PA[BnBr] 10
PANF-PA[BnBr] 10
PANF-PA[BnBr] 10
PANF-PA[BnBr] 10
PANF-PA[BnBr] 10
SnCl4·5H2O
SnCl4·5H2O
0
5
SnCl4·5H2O 15
SnCl4·5H2O 20
SnCl4·5H2O 15
SnCl4·5H2O 15
SnCl4·5H2O 15
SnCl4·5H2O 15
PANF-PA[BnBr]
5
PANF-PA[BnBr] 15
PANF-PA[BnBr] 20
PANF-PA[BnBr] 25
[a] Reaction conditions: Sucrose (0.5 g), 10 mL of solvent (water/DMAc, 3:7, v/v) at
908C for 2 h. [b] Yield determined by HPLC.
&
&
Chem. Asian J. 2015, 00, 0 – 0
4
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!