Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
hydrosilylation of enynes with siloxyl and N-heterocyclic
substituents (8p and 8q) could also achieve good yields in 16
and 8 h. The enynes with chloro and hydroxyl groups were not
compatible with this reaction.
indicating the 1,4-hydrosilylation by D and RSiD2 groups,
1
2
which was strongly supported by the H, H, and 13C NMR
spectra. The synthetic potentials of silylallenes was demon-
strated by the desilylation of 8o with TBAF (Scheme 2), which
afforded 1,3-disubstituted allene 11 in 90% yield.13
The substituent effects of 1,3-enynes on the hydrosilylation
selectivity have been further examined with alkyl substituted
enynes and terminal enynes. 1,3-Enynes with t-butyl and
cyclohexyl groups could also been successfully hydrosilyated to
give 1,4-hydrosilylation products (8r and 8s, 91 and 92%
yields) in 12 and 6 h. However, n-hexyl (R1) substituted 1,3-
enynes (R2 = H, Me) exhibited poor regioselectivity with the
formation of 1,4- and 4,3-hydrosilylation products (Table S1 in
the SI). It is very likely that the steric effects of R1 group could
efficiently inhibit the 4,3-insertion but favor 1,4-selectivity.10 It
is noted that 8n was generated selectively from enynes with R1
= n-hexyl and R2 = silyl groups because of the inductive effects
of the silyl group on the alkene moiety, which could result in
high electron density on the silyl carbon atom and facilitate the
1,2-insertion.8c,11 However, with 1,3-enynes of R1 = aryl and R2
= silyl groups, the reactions only yielded polymeric materials
and hydrosilylation products could not be observed.8a,12
Aryl-substituted hydrosilanes could also be applied to the
catalytic reaction (Table 3) with satisfactory yields (81−90%)
Scheme 2. Derivatization of Silylallene
The reaction of lanthanum ate complex 2 with silane 6 was
reported to yield lanthanum hydride K[L((Me3Si)2N)La(μ-
H)2La(H)(THF)L]K.8c In contrast, the neutral complex 3 is
inactive to the hydrosilane. These results indicated that the
negative charge in anionic [LLa(N(SiMe3)2)2]− of ate complex
2 could facilitate the σ-bond metathesis of 2 with hydrosilane
to form active rare-earth hydride intermediate (Figure
1a).8,14,15 The catalytic cycle may initiate with the selective
1,2-insertion of enyne 7 into the lanthanum hydride A, giving
the η3-propargyl/allenyl lanthanum intermediate B, similar to
the Cu and Mg hydride-catalyzed 1,4-hydroelementation of
1,3-enynes.10 After that, σ-bond metathesis of B with
hydrosilane 6 led to the exclusive formation of silylallene 8
and regeneration of the active hydride A.
a
Table 3. Hydrosilylation with Aryl Hydrosilanes
To gain further support for the proposed mechanism, DFT
calculations were carried out. First, the LUMO of the 1,3-
enyne 7g was calculated using frontier orbital population
analysis (Figure S1 in the SI). The coefficients at the C1 and
C2 (0.40, 0.31) atoms of the alkene moiety are larger than
those at the C4 and C3 (0.27, 0.13) atoms of the alkyne
moiety, which explains, to a certain degree, the preference for
initial 1,2-insertion rather than 4,3-insertion.16 To further
understand the mechanism, the calculations were also
performed on the 1,4-hydrosilylation of 1,3-enyne 7a with
MeSiH3 using [LLa(H)(N(SiMe3)2]− as the catalyst (Figure
1b). It is predicted that the hydrosilylation was initiated by the
facile 1,2-insertion of an enyne via the four-centered TS1
(Figure 1c) with the energy barrier of 21.1 kcal/mol, affording
the η3-propargyl/allenyl lanthanum intermediate B. The 4,3-
insertion showed higher activation energy (ΔΔG⧧ = 0.4 kcal/
mol) than that of 1,2-insertion because of the strong steric
repulsion between substituents on the internal alkyne moiety
and bulky ene-diamido ligand in TS1′ (Figure S2 in the SI).
Meanwhile, the calculations suggest that propargyl/allenyl
intermediate B from 1,2-insertion is more stable (ΔΔG = −4.7
kcal/mol) than dienyl intermediate B′ from 4,3-insertion. It is
worth noting that the η1-propargyl lanthanum species has not
been predicted on the basis of 1,2-insertion, which is probably
caused by the large lanthanum ion that could favor the η3-
fashion.17 In fact, the short distance of La−C4 (2.67 Å)
compared to that of La−C2 (3.37 Å), along with the almost
linear C2−C3−C4 angle of 171.9°, suggests that the geometry
of intermediate B lies between η3-propargyl/allenyl and η1-
allenyl structures. Finally, intermediate B underwent σ-bond
metathesis with hydrosilane via the TS2 to give the silylallene
with the regeneration of the hydride intermediate. This σ-bond
metathesis step requires a higher energy barrier (24.1 kcal/
mol) and thus becomes the rate-limiting step of the overall
reaction.
a
ArSiH3 6c−j (0.44 mmol), 1,3-enyne 7a, 7g, and 7m (0.4 mmol),
catalyst 2 (0.02 mmol, 5 mol %), rt and 1 mL of toluene. Isolated
yield. 60 °C.
b
and excellent regioselectivity. The catalytic protocol is
tolerated to some functional groups (chloro 8v and alkoxy
8w). In addition, the bis(allene) 8y can be obtained. It is noted
that the substituents of hydrosilanes have significant effect on
the catalytic activity: aryl hydrosilanes (phenyl 8t) are more
active than alkyl hydrosilanes (n-hexyl 8a and cyclohexyl 8b),
and bulky hydrosilanes are less active (naphthyl 8x). To our
delight, the 1,4-hydrosilylation with the secondary silane
Ph2SiH2 proceeded successfully to give the expected product
9 in 84% yield. The hydrosilylation with PhSiD3 yielded the
deuteration 1,3-disilylallenes (10) exclusively (90% yield),
12915
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 12913−12918