4
Tetrahedron
To improve the synthetic value of the reported methodology,
We are grateful to the Slovene Human Resources
Development and Scholarship Fund (contract: 11011-9/2011),
Slovenian Research Agency (contract: Programme P1-0134) for
the financial support. National NMR Centre at the National
Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia, is acknowledged for
the use of NMR instrumentation.
the following reactions were performed on the 10-mmol scale:
chlorination of 3-ethylpentan-3-ol 1r and bromination of 4-
methylbenzyl alcohol 1d. The conversion of the starting
materials into halides 2r and 3d was achieved in 95% and 99%
yields respectively. NMR analysis of the reaction mixtures
revealed that they contained only halides and (TMS)2-O in a 2:1
molar ratio. We could thus define the stoichiometry of the
process as follows:
References and notes
1.
Anastas, P. T., Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and
Practice; Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
Tanaka, K. Solvent-free Organic Synthesis.; Wiley, 2003.
Yasuda, M.; Saito, T.; Ueba, M.; Baba, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1414.
2.
3.
The products were easily separated by distillation, where
(TMS)2-O was collected as the first fraction and R-X as the
second (experimental details are given in the ESI). (TMS)2-O
could be further used as the reagent or regenerated to give the
trimethylhalosilane (TMSX).33, 34
4.
Michael B. Smith, J. M. March's Advanced Organic Chemistry:
Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007; Chap.10.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Fauvarque, J. Pure Appl. Chem 1996, 68, 1713.
El-Sakka, I. A.; Hassan, N. A. J. Sulfur Chem. 2005, 26, 33.
Landini, D.; Montanari, F.; Rolla, F. Synthesis 1974, 1974, 37.
Nguyen, T. V.; Bekensir, A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1720.
Sun, L.; Peng, G.; Niu, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, C. Synthesis 2008, 3919
The results support the assumption that the reaction course is
related to the stability of the carbocation intermediates formed
after the dehydroxylation of alcohols 1, which is characteristic of
SN1-type nucleophilic substitution processes. To verify this
assumption, we also tested 1-phenyl-1,2-ethanediol and observed
the quantitative and chemoselective formation of 2-chloro- (2u,
entry 23, Table 1) or 2-bromo-2-phenylmethanol (3l, entry 14,
Table 2) after treatment with TMSCl or TMSBr under SFRC,
confirming that this substitution likely proceeds via a SN1
reaction pathway. Because we also observed that primary and
secondary alkyl alcohols were resistant to transformations under
the aforementioned reaction conditions, the SN1 reaction course
was confirmed as the most likely reaction pathway. The
formation of carbocation intermediates can be explained by at
least two mechanisms. The first explanation assumes the initial
hydrolysis of TMSX with a small amount of water present in the
reaction system to produce HCl. In this process, the alcohol
undergoes protonation by HX with subsequent dehydration to
form a carbocation that further reacts with the released chloride
ion to produce the chlorinated product. The released water also
reacts with the remaining TMSX to form HX, and two molecules
of the generated TMSOH are easily condensed into the more
stable molecules (TMS)2O and water.23 The second explanation
is related to catalysis caused by the ‘halogen bonding’
phenomenon, which is defined as ‘non-covalent interaction of the
halogen atom (X) in one molecule with a negative site in another.
This phenomenon has been theoretically evaluated,35,36 and
several organo-halogen compounds have been used as organo-
Lewis acid catalysts in organic syntheses.37,38 Therefore, in our
case, TMSX could play a dual role, acting as both a ‘halogen
bonding’ catalyst, thereby accelerating the formation of
carbocation intermediates, and as the halogen source.
10. Denton, R. M.; An, J.; Adeniran, B.; Blake, A. J.; Lewis, W.;
Poulton, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6749.
11. An, J.; Denton, R. M.; Lambert, T. H.; Nacsa, E. D. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2014, 12, 2993.
12. Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Jamalian, A.; Kazemi, F.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5699.
13. Mokhtary, M.; Lakouraj, M. M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2012.
14. Tongkate, P.; Pluempanupat, W.; Chavasiri, W. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 1146.
15. Lissel, M.; Drechsler, K. Synthesis 1983, 1983, 314.
16. Mireille Labrouillère, C. L. R., Abdelouahad Oussaid, Hafida
Gaspard-Iloughmane, Jacques Dubac Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1995,
132, 522.
17. Snyder, D. C. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2638.
18. Lee, J. G.; Kang, K. K. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3634.
19. Ha, D. S.; Chai, G. S. 1997, 41, 541.
20. Kim, D. S. H. a. H. A. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1998, 19, 1303.
21. Yasuda, M.; Yamasaki, S.; Onishi, Y.; Baba, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 7186.
22. Yasuda, M.; Shimizu, K.; Yamasaki, S.; Baba, A. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2008, 6, 2790.
23. Michael Andreas Tandiary, Y. M., Makoto Onaka Synlett 2014,
25, 2639.
24. Jung, M. E.; Hatfield, G. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 4483.
25. Pravst, I.; Zupan, M.; Stavber, S. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 1001.
26. Podgoršek, A.; Stavber, S.; Zupan, M.; Iskra, J. Green Chem.
2007, 9, 1212.
27. Podgoršek, A.; Eissen, M.; Fleckenstein, J.; Stavber, S.; Zupan,
M.; Iskra, J. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 120.
28. Stavber, G.; Iskra, J.; Zupan, M.; Stavber, S. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 2921.
29. Stavber, G.; Iskra, J.; Zupan, M.; Stavber, S. Green Chem. 2009,
11, 1262.
30. Stavber, G.; Stavber, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2838.
31. Prebil, R.; Laali, K. K.; Stavber, S. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2108.
32. Prebil, R.; Stavber, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 1266.
33. Pray, B. O.; Sommer, L. H.; Goldberg, G. M.; Kerr, G. T.;
Giorgio, P. A. D.; Whitmore, F. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70,
433.
3. Conclusion
34. Friedrich, E. C.; DeLucca, G. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1678.
35. Clark, T.; Hennemann, M.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. J. Mol.
Model. 2006, 13, 291.
36. Politzer, P.; Murray, J. S.; Clark, T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2010, 12, 7748.
37. Saito, M.; Tsuji, N.; Kobayashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. Org. Lett. 2015,
17, 3000.
38. Xu, Q.; Xie, H.; Chen, P.; Yu, L.; Chen, J.; Hu, X. Green Chem.
2015, 17, 2774.
We have demonstrated a chemoselective and scalable method
for the direct conversion of benzyl, allyl and tertiary alkyl
alcohols into their corresponding chlorides or bromides via the
direct nucleophilic substitution of hydroxyl groups using
trimethylhalosilanes as halogen sources under catalyst- and
SFRC. Under these reaction conditions, we investigated the
method’s limitations by studying benzyl alcohols with strongly
deactivated aromatic rings and primary and secondary alkyl
alcohols. The development of catalyst- and SFRC protocols will
increase the green chemical profile of this type of organic
transformation.
Supplementary Material
Detailed experimental information, spectroscopic and other
characterisation data for compounds 2a-2u and 3a-3l as well as
copies of the corresponding 1H, 13C and 19Fspectra.
Acknowledgments