DDNP: A Fluorophore for Fluorescence Microscopy
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 24, 1996 5573
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Other solvents used were spectroscopic
grade or better and were obtained from Fisher (Tustin, CA). All
solvents were degassed and sparged with argon prior to use. Absorption
spectra were determined at concentrations around 2 × 10-5 M with a
Beckman DU-50 spectrophotometer. NMR and IR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker AM-360WB spectrometer and a Perkin-Elmer
710B IR spectrophotometer, respectively. Fluorescence spectra were
determined on SLM 4800C (ADMAN, DDNP) and Perkin-Elmer LS-
50B (DDNP) fluorescence spectrophotometers, with slit widths routinely
set at 4-5 nm. For DDNP measurements, both standard and red
sensitive (R-928) photomultiplier tubes were used. Fluorescence was
referenced to solvent blank using matched cells (Spectrocell, Inc), with
emission corrected for photomultiplier wavelength response. Quantum
yields (Q) were determined relative to quinine sulfate in 0.1 N H2SO4
(Regis Chemicals, Morton Grove, IL) (Q ) 0.55, excitation ) 365
nm)14,15 or Rhodamine 101 (Kodak, Rochester NY) (Q ) 0.97-1;
excitation ) 393-460 nm).16-18 Melting points were determined on
an electrothermal melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. HPLC
conditions for analysis of II were as follows: Reverse phase Econosil
C-18 column 5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm. Solvent: H2O:CH3CN, 7:13, with
detection by UV absorption at 360 nm. Elemental analyses were
performed by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc., Knoxville, TN.
Organic extracts were combined, dried, and evaporated to give a yellow
solid. Recrystallization from ethanol afforded 3.67 g (64%) of a yellow
solid, melting at 153.5-155 °C: 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS) δ 2.67 (s,
3H, COCH3), 3.15 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 6.87 (d, 1H, H-5), 7.17 (dd, 1H,
H-7), 7.63 (d, 1H, H-4), 7.80 (d, 1H, H-8), 7.92 (dd, 1H, H-3), 8.32
(bs, 1H, H-1). J1,3 ) 2.3 Hz, J3,4 ) 8.7 Hz, J5,7 ) 2.4 Hz, J7,8 ) 9.3
Hz. MS (M+) 213; found: 213. Anal. Calcd for C14H15NO: C, 78.84;
H, 7.09; N, 6.57. Found: C, 78.96; H, 7.10; N, 6.45.
1,1-Dicyano-2-[6-(dimethylamino)naphthalen-2-yl]propene (DDNP,
II). A mixture of malononitrile (436 mg, 6.6 mmol) and 2-acetyl-6-
(dimethylamino)naphthalene (ADMAN, I) (1.278 g, 6 mmol) was
heated to 110 °C in 20 mL of pyridine for 19 h. After cooling, the
remaining red solid was dissolved in 100 mL of methylene chloride,
adsorbed onto 10 g of flash silica gel (230-400 mesh) and chromato-
graphed with toluene. Appropriate fractions were combined and
evaporated to give 1.12 g (72%) of II. Recrystallization from benzene-
hexane gave red needles melting at 154.5-155 °C: 1H NMR (CDCl3,
TMS) δ 2.69 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.11 (s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 6.85 (d, 1H, H-5),
7.18 (dd, 1H, H-7), 7.56 (dd, 1H, H-3), 7.66 (d, 1H, H-4), 7.76 (d, 1H,
H-8), 8.02 (d, 1H, H-1). J1,3 ) 2.04 Hz, J3,4 ) 9.13 Hz, J5,7 ) 2.5 Hz,
J7,8 ) 9.11 Hz. IR (CHCl3) 2250 cm-1 (CN stretching). MS (M+):
261; found: 261. Anal. Calcd for C17H15N3: C, 78.13; H, 5.79; N,
18.08. Found: C, 78.17; H, 5.68; N, 17.91.
X-ray Structure Determination. X-ray crystallographic data were
obtained on the two solid isoforms of DDNP, A (red needles) and B
(yellow plates). Crystals of both isoforms were grown from benzene
solution under petroleum ether (30-60°) vapor. For isoform (A):
monoclinic, P21/n, no. 14, a ) 4.031(1), b ) 13.269 (3), c ) 26.030
(7) Å, â ) 93.63(2)°, V ) 1389.5(6) Å3, Z ) 4, Dx ) 1.249 Mg/m3,
Dm ) 1.24(2) Mg/m3, Mo KR radiation, λ ) 0.71069 Å, µ ) 0.07075
mm-1, T ) 293 (2) K, crystal shape: needle, crystal size: 0.08 mm ×
0.20 mm × 0.44 mm. For isoform (B): monoclinic, P21/n, no. 14, a
) 17.668(5), b ) 7.627(1), c ) 20.948(5) Å, â ) 90.16(2)°, V )
2823(1) Å3, Z ) 8, Dx ) 1.230 Mg/m3, Dm ) 1.22(2) Mg/m3, Mo KR
radiation, λ ) 0.71069 Å, µ ) 0.06965 mm-1, T ) 293(2) K, crystal
shape: irregular plate, crystal size: 0.20 mm × 0.56 mm × 0.72 mm.
The unit cell dimensions were determined by least squares with 25
centered reflections for the red isoform (A) (6.0 e θ e 10.9°) and 75
reflections for the yellow isoform (B) (6.1° e θ e 14.4°) using graphite
monochromated Mo KR radiation. Both structures were solved by
direct methods using MULTAN88 programs.19 Atomic scattering
factors for neutral atoms and dispersion corrections were used. The
Xtal13.220 system of crystallographic programs was used for the
correlation and reduction of data, structure refinement, and interpreta-
tion. ORTEPII21 was used to produce molecular graphics, with
calculations performed on VAX 8550 computers. Stereo pairs and
space filling models were also generated with the Insight II V2.3.5
(Biosym Technologies, San Diego, CA) on a Silicon Graphics Extreme
work station.
Results
Chemistry. Standard conditions described in the literature
for the Knoevenagel condensation of malononitrile with sub-
stituted acetophenones23 were not successful with II. Recently
described conditions employing TiCl4 as a catalyst could not
be used with acetophenone because of side reactions.24 Reaction
in benzene or toluene with a piperidinium acetate catalyst and
azeotropic removal of water gave only low conversion to the
desired adduct after 12 h at reflux. Pyridine has long been
known to catalyze the dehydration of the initial addition product
in the Knoevenagel condensation and has been used in conjunc-
tion with secondary amines to accelerate the reaction. It was
found that reaction of I with 1.05 equiv of malononitrile in
pyridine at reflux gave a 66-85% yield of the adduct, II. The
product was easily identified by TLC as a visible orange spot
of higher Rf than the starting ketone (solvent, 100% benzene,
silica gel). The compound appeared as a red solid after flash
chromatography. The structure of II is consistent with its
spectral properties.
Analytical samples of DDNP are shelf-stable at room tem-
perature. Methanolic solutions of II were found to be stable
for several weeks, as determined by their single emission peak
at 610 nm upon excitation at either 340 or 420 nm. On the
other hand, II slowly decomposed in other solvents (i.e., CH3-
CN and ether containing solvents) giving rise to a second pair
of excitation and emission bands at shorter wavelengths. The
observed second fluorescent transition was found to be solvent
polarity dependent, resembling the fluorescence properties of
the acetyl precursor, ADMAN (I) (Table 1). Verification of
this decomposition was obtained by HPLC analysis, wherein
the decomposition product eluted as a single peak when
coinjected with a purified sample of I (DDNP: Rt ) 9.02 min;
I and decomposition product of II: Rt ) 12.56 min). Using
this technique, the t1/2 of decomposition of II in CH3CN at 20
°C was determined to be approximately 36 days.
2-Acetyl-6-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (ADMAN, I).5 To a
solution of 5.26 g (117 mmol) of dimethylamine in 29 mL of freshly
distilled hexamethylphosphoric triamide (HMPT) were added 31 mL
of dry toluene and 780 mg (112 mmol) of Li in small pieces. The
mixture was stirred under argon at room temperature for 1.5 h.
2-Acetyl-6-methoxynaphthalene22 (5.57 g, 27.8 mmol) was added in
one portion and stirring continued for 20 h. The mixture was cooled
in an ice-water bath and poured into a cold water/ethyl acetate mixture
(300 mL each). After thorough mixing, the layers were separated, and
the water layer was extracted twice with 225 mL of ethyl acetate.
(14) Melhuish, W. H. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1964, 54, 183-186.
(15) Chen, R. F. Anal. Biochem. 1967, 19, 374-387.
(16) Schnerzel, R. E.; Klosterman, N. E. NBS Special Publication 1976,
526, 3-4.
(17) Drexhage, K. N. NBS Special Publication 1977, 466, 33-40.
(18) Karstens, T.; Kobs, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 1871-1872.
(19) Debaerdemaeker, T.; Germain, G.; Main, P.; Refaat, L. S.; Tate,
C.; Woolfson, M. M. MULTAN88: A System of Computer Programs for
the Automatic Solutions of Crystal Structures from X-ray Diffraction Data;
University of York: England, 1988.
(20) Hall, S. R.; Stewart, J. M. The Xtal3.0 system; University of Western
Australia: Australia, and University of Maryland: U.S.A., 1990.
(21) Johnson, C. K. ORTEPII. Report ORNL-3794; Oak Ridge National
Laboratory: Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1976.
(22) Arsenijevic, L.; Arsenijevic, V.; Horeau, A.; Jacques, J. Org. Synth.
Coll. 1988, 6, 34-36.
Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy. Substantial differ-
ences exist between the electronic absorption spectra of DDNP
(II) and those of the parent I. The ultraviolet absorption
maximum exhibited by the acetyl derivative I, centered at 360
nm (ꢀ ) 1.8 × 104), is red-shifted by 50-80 nm in the product
(23) Coligny, T. H.; Normant, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1971, 272C, 1425-
1430.
(24) Lehnert, W. Tetrahedron 1972, 28, 663-666.