Q. Zhang, et al.
CatalysisCommunications136(2020)105922
Fig. 1. Structures of the six ligands (P1-P6).
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction
(XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), thermogravimetry/
derivative thermogravimetry (TG/DTG), transmission electron micro-
scopy (TEM), temperature programmed desorption-mass spectrometry
(TPD–MS), and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy.
2.4. Catalyst characterization
The NC and P2–NC reacted for seven hours were denoted as the used
NC and P2–NC, respectively. The fresh and used NC and P2–NC were
maintained at 3 °C for 6 h in a refrigerator. After cooling, the catalysts
were filtered from the catalytic solution, washed with water, and dried
in a vacuum oven at 55 °C to obtain a solid catalyst for characterization.
The TG/DTG was performed in a NETZSCH STA 449 F3 Jupiter
system (nitrogen atmosphere, temperature range 50–900 °C, ramp rate
10 °C/min). The crystal structures of the samples were determined by
XRD (2θ = 10–90°). The FT-IR spectra of the catalysts were determined
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials
Glyphosine (P1), risedronic acid (P2), cytidine 5′-monophosphate
(P3), hydroxyphosphono-acetic acid (P4), 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-
tricarboxylic acid (P5), phenylphosphonic acid (P6), CuCl (99%), and
NH4Cl (purity ≥99.5%), were purchased from Adamas and directly
used without purification. The molecular structure of the six ligands are
shown in Fig. 1. The NCs containing Px are denoted as Px-NC. The
amount of Px (in moles) was based on the CuCl quantity.
by
a Bruker Vertex70 FTIR spectrometer (wavenumber range
500–4000 cm−1). The XPS data was performed in a Kratos AXIS Ultra
DLD spectrometer with a monochromatized Al-Kα x-ray source, the
deconvolution of the XPS peaks are obtained by the XPSPEAK41 soft-
ware to process XPS data. The morphologies and microstructures of the
samples were recorded by a JEM2100F TEM instrument. The TPD-MS
experiments were performed with a Micromeritic ASAP 2720. The ab-
solute Cu contents in the samples were tested by ICP atomic emission
spectroscopy (710ES, Varian, USA).
2.2. Catalyst preparation
The catalyst performances were evaluated in a bubble column re-
actor (length = 400 mm, outer diameter = 40 mm, inner dia-
meter = 10 mm). As a control, an unmodified NC was prepared by
dissolving 5.35 g (0.1 mol) of NH4Cl and 9.9 g (0.1 mol) of CuCl in
10 ml of deionized water at 80 °C. For the experimental specimens, an
appropriate molar amount of Px (based on the CuCl quantity as men-
tioned above) was added to the NC. Scheme S1 shows the formation of
the gas-phase products in the dimerization process and the catalyst
performance evaluation is performed in the C2H2 dimerization device
(Fig. S1).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalytic activities of NC and Px-NC
The performances of the NC and Px-NCs were initially tested under
the same fixed conditions (T = 80 °C, C2H2 gas hourly space velocity
GHSV(C2H2) = 105 h−1). The results are shown in Fig. 2. All Px-NCs
exhibited a higher catalytic activity than NC; specifically, the catalytic
activity decreased in the order P2-NC > P1-NC > P6-NC > P4-
NC > P3-NC > P5-NC > NC. The best performer (P2-NC) converted
49.2% of the C2H2 with an MVA selectivity of 80.3%. The conversion
improvement of P2-NC over NC was 39.5%. Next, we screened the P2
content (Fig. S2) and the GHSV(C2H2) (Fig. S3). The performance was
maximized at a P2 content of 5% (P2/Cu = 0.05/1). Under a GHSV
(C2H2) of 80 h−1, the conversion performance improved to 51.1%. In a
long-term test, the 5% P2-NC delivered both excellent activity (51.1%
C2H2 conversion and 78.8% MVA selectivity) and satisfactory stability
(Fig. S4). Therefore, P2 can significantly enhance the catalytic perfor-
mance and extend the lifetime of NC for acetylene dimerization.
Contrasting the ligand structure, ligands P1 and P2 contain two
phosphonic acid groups in six ligands, which may play an important
role in high catalytic activity. Phosphonic acid groups are activated by
π-electron cloud of benzene, so P6 has a remarkable effect in the re-
action among the P3-P6 modified catalysts. By the same way, the
2.3. Analytical methods
The criteria of the catalytic performance, namely, the acetylene
conversion (X) and MVA selectivity (S), were respectively computed as
follows:
λ2 + 2λ3 + 2λ4 + 3λ5
X =
S =
× 100%
λ1 + λ2 + 2λ3 + 2λ4 + 3λ5
2λ3
× 100%
λ2 + 2λ3 + 2λ4 + 3λ5
where λ1, λ2, λ3, λ4, and λ5 are the volume fractions of the gas products
C2H2, CH3CHO, MVA, 2-chloroprene (CP), and divinylacetylene (DVA),
respectively.
2