Full Paper
detection and for analytical applications. For these measurements,
ten different analyses for the selected receptor were performed in
order to obtain the LOQ. The LOD was obtained by the formula:
inic cores, for which the total charge is zero), at the HF/6–31G*//
B3LYP/6–31G* level using Gaussian 09, revision A.02.[50] This proce-
dure yielded a partial charge of +1.418 e for Zn2+ and ꢀ2.835 e
for ꢀthe receptor. To obtain a neutral system, the partial charges of
BF4 were scaled as to yield a total charge of ꢀ0.709 e (2qBF4
+
ydl ¼ yblank þ 3 std
3
q
rec +3qZn =0.0 e). Simulation boxes (ca., 64.564.564.5 after
equilibration) were constructed from one receptor, three cations
and two counteranions inside a cubic box containing 2058 chloro-
form molecules. Simulations began with an initial solvent minimi-
zation procedure for the removal of close contacts between solute
and solvent molecules, with the solute placed under strong posi-
tional restraints. The restraints were then removed, and the whole
system was allowed to relax. Subsequently, a weak positional re-
straint was applied to the solute, and the system was heated to
300 K in the NVT ensemble for 0.5 ns, using the “velocity rescaling
with stochastic term” thermostat (tcoupling =2.0 ps), and equilibrated
under the NPT ensemble during 2 ns using the Berendsen barostat
(tcoupling =5.0 ps) until the density of the system was brought to
a plateau. The positional restraints used throughout both heating
and equilibration procedures were definitely removed during the
data collection period (5 independent 20 ns in the NPT ensemble).
The LINCS algorithm was used to constrain all hydrogen involving
bond distances at their equilibrium values; periodic boundary con-
ditions, along with a 10 nonbonded cutoff were used; long-
range electrostatic interactions were calculated with the particle
mesh Ewald (PME) method; snapshots were collected every 0.2 ps.
Prior to the calculation of the spatial distribution functions, all tra-
jectories were concatenated and fitted to the first structure in the
trajectory using the pyridine heavy atoms (C,N). The isosurfaces
were drawn at the 100% isolevel, meaning that they encompass
the totality of the positions occupied by the solute atoms during
the course of the simulations.
in which ydl is the signal detection limit and std is the standard
deviation.
Preparation of PMMA polymer films doped with compound
2
The preparation of the PMMA films was performed by dissolving
the PMMA powder (0.1 g) in chloroform, followed by addition of
compound 2 (0.001–0.005 g) dissolved in the same solvent. The
polymer films were obtained after solvent evaporation at 408C
under vacuum for 24 h.[42,43] Due to the spectroscopic characteris-
tics the films doped with 0.005 g of the ligand 2 were selected for
the studies with the metal ions.
Synthesis of the organic ligand
Synthesis of the precursor porphyrin: The 2-formyl-5,10,15,20-
tetraphenylporphyrin 1 was prepared from 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-
porphyrinatocopper(II), N,N’-dimethylformamide (DMF) and phos-
phorus oxychloride (POCl3), according to literature procedure.[44]
Synthesis
of
3,5-bis(5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin-2-yl-
methyl)pyridine: [La(OTf)3] (20 mol%, 4.6 mmol, 2.7 mg) and piperi-
dine (1.5 equiv, 35.0 mmol, 3.6 mL) were added to a solution of 2-
formyl-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (23.0 mmol, 15.0 mg) in dry
toluene (2.0 mL), which was then heated at reflux for 19 h. After
cooling, the reaction mixture was washed with water and extracted
with chloroform. The organic phase was dried (Na2SO4) and the sol-
vent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture
was submitted to column chromatography (silica gel) using tolu-
ene as eluent. The compound 2 was isolated in 54% yield and full
characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and UV/Vis
techniques.
Crystallization of the Zn2+ derivative of 3,5-bis(5,10,15,20-
tetraphenylporphyrin-2-ylmethyl)pyridine 3
Compound 2 was dissolved in a minimal amount of CH2Cl2 in
a vial. A few drops of [Zn(BF4)2]·xH2O in CH3CN were added to this
solution and a change in the mixture color from brown to green
was observed in accordance with the formation of complex 3. The
vial was filled with hexane and sealed. From the crystallization pro-
cess was obtained the crystal of the Zn2+ derivative of 3,5-
bis(5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin-2-ylmethyl)pyridine (3), which
was fully elucidated by using single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
3,5-Bis(5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin-2-ylmethyl)pyridine (2):
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d=8.83 (4H, AB, J=4.8 Hz, H-b), 8.74
(2H, d, J=4.8 Hz, H-b), 8.66 (2H, d, J=4.8 Hz, H-b), 8.52 (2H, d, J=
4.8 Hz, H-b), 8.38 (2H, d, J=4.8 Hz, H-b), 8.26 (2H, s, H-3), 8.26–8.15
(8H, m, H-o-Ph), 7.89 (2H, s, H-2’’ and H-6’’), 7.76–7.61 (20H, m, H-
o,m,p-Ph), 7.45 (2H t, J=7.6 Hz, H-m,p-Ph), 7.35 (2H t, J=7.6 Hz, H-
m,p-Ph), 7.27 (4H, t, J=7.7 Hz, H-m,p-Ph), 7.10 (4H, t, J=7.7 Hz, Ar-
H-m, p-Ph), 6.58 (1H, s, H-4’’), 4.10 (4H, s, H-1’), ꢀ2.79 ppm (4H, s,
N-H);13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d=147.5 (C-2’’), 142.2, 142.1, 141.8,
141.4, 135.9 (C-4’’), 135.8, 134.6, 134.5, 134.1, 133.3, 131.9, 130.6,
129.0, 128.2, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 126.8, 126.65, 126.61, 126.2, 120.5,
120.1, 119.6, 119.0, 33.5 ppm (C-1’); UV/Vis (CHCl3): lmax (loge)=
418.0 (5.56), 516.0 (4.49), 550.0 (4.01), 592.0 (3.96), 647.0 nm
(3.70 dm3 mꢀ1 cmꢀ1); MS (MALDI): 1332.4 [M+H]+; HRMS-ESI: m/z
calcd (%) for C95H66N9: 1332.5441 [M+H]+; found: 1332.5395.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to the Universidade de Aveiro, Fundażo
para a CiÞncia e a Tecnologia (FCT), European Union, QREN,
FEDER and COMPETE for funding the QOPNA research unit
(project
PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2013,
FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-
037296). We acknowledge the Portuguese National NMR Net-
work (RNRMN), supported by funds from FCT, Scientific PRO-
TEOMASS Association (Portugal), CICECO (PEst-C/CTM/LA0011/
2013, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-037271) and REQUIMTE (PEst-C/
EQB/La0006/2013) for general funding and Fundażo para
a CiÞncia e a Tecnologia (FCT) for specific funding towards the
purchase of the single-crystal X-ray diffractometer. N.M.M.M.
and S.M.S. thank FCT/MEC for their Postdoctoral grant SFRH/
BPD/84216/2012 and SFRH/BPD/64752/2009. C.N. thanks the
Xunta de Galicia (Spain) for her postdoctoral contract (I2C pro-
Theoretical studies
Atomic parameters for the 3,5-bisporphyrinylpyridine receptor and
the zinc cation were taken from the GAFF force field[45] using Ante-
chamber,[46] whereas chloroform was described with parameters
taken from Fox et al.[47] Parameters for the BF4 anions were those
ꢀ
described by Wenchuan Wang and co-workers.[48] Calculation of
atomic RESP[49] fitted partial charges for the receptor were calculat-
ed on compound 3 (i.e., the receptor and two Zn2+ in the porphyr-
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 6684 – 6692
6691
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim