18450 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 48, 2004
Geng et al.
and the nanotubes normally nucleate from the substrate-anchored
particles by the base growth mechanism.23 This situation makes
only a small surface part of a nanoparticle exposed to the gas
phase and hence very limited surface area is available for carbon
uptake at the gas-nanoparticles interface. In this case, the
geometry factor becomes more important. Gordon et al. have
studied small Ni nanoparticles with atomic numbers particularly
Acknowledgment. We thank financial support from Thomas
Swan Co. & Lt., U.K., and the EU project CARDECOM GRD1-
2001-41830. We also thank Dr. Ian A. Kinloch, Professor Alan
H. Windle and Dr. Yali Li (Department of Materials Science,
University of Cambridge), Mr. Stephen Cash and Dr. Charanjeet
Singh (Thomas Swan Co. & Ltd., UK), and Dr. Milo S. P.
Shaffer (Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, London)
for helpful discussions.
between 55 and 147 corresponding to a particle size of 1.0 and
4,25
1
.5 nm, respectively.2
In comparison of two geometrical
configurations, cubooctahedra or icosahedra, they conclude that
the cohesive energy between the nanoparticles of the same size
and different geometry is very small (∆E e 500 cal/mol),
indicating that the coexistence of both structures is possible.
Considering the catalysis process in the growth of single-wall
nanotubes, it is reasonable to assume that both structures would
assist the nucleation of the tubes but lead to different tube
structures or chiralities. The geometrical difference of metal
particles may be a main responsible reason of why single-walled
nanotubes obtained from a catalyst precursor route in CVD are
always mixed in structure, even though the tube diameter may
be controlled within a narrow range.
References and Notes
(
1) Baughman, R. H.; Zakhidov, A. A.; de Heer, W. A. Science 2002,
97, 787.
(2) Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Eklund, P. C. Science of
Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes; Academic Press: San Diego, 1996.
2
(3) Ural, A.; Li, Y.; Dai, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3464.
(4) Ren, Z. F.; Huang, Z. P.; Xu, J. W.; Wang, J. H.; Bush, P.; Siegal,
M. P.; Provencio, P. N. Science 1998, 282, 1105.
(5) Helveg, S.; Lopez-Cartes, C.; Sehested, J.; Hansen, P. L.; Clausen,
B. S.; Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Norskov, J. K. Nature
2004, 427, 426.
(6) Chhowalla, M.; Ducati, C.; Reppesinghe, N. L.; Teo, K. B. K.;
Amaratunga, G. A. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 2079.
(7) Hofmann, S.; Ducati, C.; Kleinsorge, B.; Robertson, J. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2003, 83, 4661.
(
8) Kleinsorge, B.; Golovko, V. B.; Hofmann, S.; Geng, J.; Jefferson,
Conclusions
D.; Johnson, B. F. G. ChemComm 2004, 1416.
(9) Ago, H.; Komatsu, T.; Ohshima, S.; Kuriki, Y.; Yumura, M. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 79.
10) Edwards, A. B.; Garner, C. D.; Roberts, K. J. J. Phys. Chem. B
997, 101, 20.
11) Emmenegger, C.; Bonard, J. M.; Mauron, P.; Sudan, P.; Lepora,
A.; Grobety, B.; Zuttel, A.; Schlapbach, L. Carbon 2003, 41, 539.
12) (a) Geng, J.; Singh, C.; Shephard, D. S.; Shaffer, M. S. P.; Johnson,
B. F. G.; Windle, A. H. ChemComm 2002, 2666. (b) U.K. patent application
No. 0216654.4.
13) Choi, Y. S.; Cho, Y. S.; Kang, J. H.; Kim, Y. J.; Kim, I. H.; Park,
S. H.; Lee, H. W.; Hwang, S. Y.; Lee, S. J.; Lee, C. G.; Oh, T. S.; Choi,
J. S.; Kang, S. K.; Kim, J. M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 3565.
14) Niu, C.; Sichel, E. K.; Hoch, R.; Moy, D.; Tennent, H. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1997, 70, 1480.
(15) Hofmann, S.; Ducati, C.; Robertson, J.; Kleinsorge, B. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2003, 83, 135.
16) Gilliland, W. L.; Blanchard, A. A. In Inorganic Syntheses; Fernelius,
W. C., et al., Eds.; McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.: New York, 1946; Vol. II,
Chapter 75, pp 234.
(17) The Merck Index, 13th ed.; Merck Research Laboratory, Division
of Merck & Co.: Whitehouse Station, NJ, 2001; p 1166.
18) Edwards, A. B.; Garner, C. D.; Roberts, K. J. J. Phys. Chem. B
997, 101, 20.
19) Messing, G. L.; Zhang, S. C.; Jayanthi, G. V. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
1993, 76, 2707.
(20) Patil, P. S. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1999, 59, 185.
21) Xia, B.; Lenggoro, I. W.; Okuyama, K. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2001,
4, 1425.
22) Stopic, S.; Nedeljkovic, J.; Rakocevic, Z.; Uskokovic, D. J. Mater.
Res. 1999, 14, 3059.
(23) Li, Y.; Kim, W.; Zhang, Y.; Rolandi, M.; Wang, D.; Dai, H. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 11424.
In this paper we have presented the following results. (1)
Nickel formate serves as an ideal precursor for formation of Ni
nanoparticles with a controllable size and a narrow size
distribution. These freshly formed nanoparticles are catalytically
very active, leading to a highly efficient growth of carbon
nanotubes. (2) Growth of randomly distributed and vertically
aligned carbon nanotubes on flat surface can be realized by
either CVD or PECVD using the nickel formate route. As our
method of deposition of the catalyst is solution-based, it has
the merits of low-cost, ease of operation, large-area growth, and
suitability for coating 3D substrates with complex shapes and
structures. (3) The reason nickel formate is an ideal catalyst
precursor is analyzed from a chemistry point of view. The self-
redox feature of the decomposition reaction, together with the
relatively low decomposition temperature (230-260 °C), dis-
tinguishes nickel formate from other common nickel precursors.
In the case of nickel formate, it is not necessary to have external
reducing agents such as H2 for formation of the desired Ni
nanoparticles. (4) The formed Ni nanoparticles can be nearly
monodispersed in size, possibly arising from a tendency of the
newly formed nanoparticles to chemically adsorb a thin layer
of carbon-containing species produced from the precursor. This
protective layer may passivate the particles from agglomeration
particularly at the early stage of nucleation. (5) Although the
particles size may be controlled within a narrow range, different
geometrical structures coexist. We believe that this structural
difference of metal leads to the structural difference of nano-
tubes, particularly in the case of growth of single-wall carbon
nanotubes.
(
1
(
(
(
(
(
(
1
(
(
8
(
(
24) Gordon, M. B.; Cyrot-Lackmann, F.; Desjonqueres, M. C. Surf.
Sci. 1977, 68, 359.
25) Gordon, M. B.; Cyrot-Lackmann, F.; Desjonqueres, M. C. Surf.
Sci. 1979, 80, 159.
(