ELECTRODEPOSITION OF NICKEL FROM SULFATE SOLUTIONS
61
REFERENCES
of the cathodic process in the solutions under study. It was
found that, at pH 2.0 and aminoacetic acid concentrations
of 0.13 and 0.3 M, these energies are, respectively, 45.5 and
53.2 kJ mol–1, and for solutions with pH 5.5 at the same
concentrations of glycine, 31.4 and 34.0 kJ mol–1. These
values also confirm the slow course of the electrochemical
event complicated by the adsorption of glycine.
1. Voitsekhovskii, Yu.G., Voitsekhovskaya, R.N., and
Galyamova, T.A., Prikladnaya elektrokhimiya: Teoriya,
tekhnologiya i zashchitnye svoistva gal’vanicheskikh
pokrytii (Applied Electrochemistry: Theory, Technology,
and Protective Properties of Electroplated Coatings),
Kazan, 1989., pp. 8–16.
The presence of aminoacetic acid in the electrolyte also
affects the rate of the anodic process, with the nature of this
influence determined by the solution acidity. In electrolytes
with pH 2.0 (Fig. 4a), the dissolution rate decreases with
increasing glycine concentration and a passivity plateau is
observed at concentrations exceeding 0.18 M.According
to [10], the ionization of nickel at pH 2 occurs via formation
of a catalytic complex with sulfate ions. Probably being
adsorbed on the electrode surface, aminoacetic acid
displaces SO42– ions and thereby has an inhibiting effect.
In solutions with pH > 2, no passivity is observed (Fig.
4b); the process of nickel ionization is also retarded as the
glycine concentration in the electrolyte increases.
2. Vinogradov, S.N., Magomedova, E.A., Mal’tseva, G.N.,
and Makarycheva, I.V., Sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi
nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Zashchitnye pokrytiya
v mashinostroenii i priborostroenii” (Proc.All-Russia Sci.-
Pract. Conf. Protective Coatings in Machine Building and
Instrument Making”), Penza, 2001., pp. 5–6.
3. Kurnakova, N.Yu. and Bakalai, V.I., Sbornik materialov
Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii
“Zashchitnye pokrytiya v mashinostroenii i priborostroenii”
(Proc. All-Russia Sci.-Pract. Conf. Protective Coatings in
Machine Building and Instrument Making”), Penza, 2005,
pp. 22–25.
4. Dyatlova, N.M., Temkina, V.Ya., and Popov, K.I.,
Kompleksony i kompleksonaty metallov (Metal Complexons
and Complexonates), Moscow: Khimiya, 1988.
The buffer capacity of the electrolyte in the presence
of glycine exceeds that with boric acid. In addition,
the electrolytes studied can be used to obtain lustrous
coatings at current densities of up to 10 A dm–2 without
introduction of brightening additives.
5. Kruglova, E.G. and Vyacheslavov, P.M., Kontrol’
gal’vanicheskikh vann i pokrytii (Control over Galvanic
Baths and Electroplated Coatings), Leningrad: Mashgiz,
1961.
6. Peters., D.G., Hayes, J.M., and Hieftje, G.M., Chemical
Separations and Measurements: Theory and Practice of
Analytical Chemistry, Saunders Company, 1974.
CONCLUSIONS
(1) It was found that presence of glycine in a nickel
sulfate electrolyte makes lower the discharge rate of
nickel ions under any of the conditions studied.
7. Ohnaka, N. and Matsuda, H., J. Electroanalyt. Chem.,
1975, vol. 62., pp. 245–257.
8. Kravtsov, V.I., Ravnovesie i kinetika elektrodnykh reaktsii
kompleksnykh metallov (Equilibrium and Kinetics of
Electrode Reactions of Complex Metals), Leningrad:
Khimiya, 1985.
(2) Electronic spectroscopy data confirmed the
formation of nickel complexes with glycine in the solution
bulk only at pH 5.5 in the concentration range studied.
(3) An analysis of partial polarization curves
demonstrated that the discharge rate of nickel ions in
a glycine-containing sulfate electrolyte is limited by
the electrochemical stage of transfer of a first electron,
complicated by the adsorption of glycine.
9. Lever,A.B.P., Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, Elsevier
Science, 1985.
10. Ivanov, E.S., Ingibitory korrozii metallov v kislykh sredakh
(Inhibitors of Metal Corrosion in Acid Media), Moscow:
Metallurgiya, 1986.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 83 No. 1 2010