C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
the Pt (100) face.14 This suggests that the (100) face is dominant
in the 8 nm Pt nanocube assembly on the carbon paper. The specific
2
catalytic activity (in mA/cm ) was calculated by dividing the raw
electrocatalytic current over the surface area of the catalyst. Figure
2
2
C shows the specific activity for oxygen reduction (mA/cm ) of
the commercial Pt catalyst and the Pt nanocubes synthesized in
this work. For potentials ranging from 0.9 to 0.8 V (typical potential
range for oxygen reduction reaction), the activity of the Pt
nanocubes is over 2 times as high as that of the commercial catalyst,
indicating that the nanocubes indeed offer an enhancement in
oxygen reduction. Note that the shape of the Pt nanocubes after
electrochemical experiments was unchanged.
We have reported that the monodisperse Pt nanocubes can be
synthesized by the reduction of Pt(acac)
acid and oleylamine and a trace amount of Fe(CO)
2
in the presence of oleic
. Self-assembly
5
of these nanocubes results in a (100) textured array. The nanocubes
on a carbon paper show an enhanced catalysis toward oxygen
reduction, and their specific activity is over 2 times as high as that
from the commercial Pt catalyst. Detailed studies on size- and shape-
dependent catalysis of these Pt nanoparticles for oxygen reduction
at a cathode and methanol oxidation at an anode are underway.
Figure 2. (A) HRSEM image of a specific carbon fiber in the carbon paper
showing the presence of 8 nm Pt nanocubes. (B) Cyclic voltammograms
of the commercial Pt catalyst and the 8 nm Pt nanocubes with a scanning
rate of 5 mV/s in 1.5 M H2SO4 under constant nitrogen bubbling. (C)
Specific activity of oxygen reduction for (b) the commercial Pt catalyst
and (0) the 8 nm Pt nanocubes.
Acknowledgment. The work was supported by NSF/DMR
0606264 and a scholarship from Hitachi Maxell, Ltd.
Supporting Information Available: Pt nanoparticle synthesis and
characterization. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
at http://pubs.acs.org.
oleic acid. If oleylamine was used alone, spherical Pt nanoparticles
were obtained (Figure S5). Unlike the preparation of FePt nanocubes
in which the addition sequence of oleic acid and oleylamine is
important,11 the synthesis of Pt nanocubes under the current reaction
conditions does not need the sequential addition of these surfactants.
This suggests that the presence of oleic acid, a weaker surfactant
to Pt than oleylamine, facilitates the growth of the particles into
cubes. Note that oleic acid alone cannot stabilize the Pt nanoparticles
wellsmost of them form aggregates, but those suspended in hexane
show cubic shape (Figure S6) even though the particles are
polydispersed.
The catalytic activity of the 8 nm Pt nanocubes toward oxygen
reduction was evaluated in an electrochemical measurement
system12 and compared with that of the commercial spherical Pt
nanoparticle catalyst with a mean diameter of 3 nm (TEC10E50E
from Tanaka Noble Metal Ltd., Japan). The catalysts were deposited
on carbon paper (TORAY) (Figure S7) that had been sonicated in
References
(
1) (a) Davis, R. J.; Derouane, E. G. Nature 1991, 349, 313-315. (b) Temple,
K.; J a¨ kle, F.; Sheridan, J. B.; Manners, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
1
355-1364. (c) Shimada, T.; Nakamura, I.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 10546-10547. (d) Bonalumi, N.; Vargas, A.; Ferri, D.;
B u¨ rgi, T.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8467-
8
477. (e) Diezi, S.; Ferri, D.; Vargas, A.; Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4048-4057.
(2) (a) Brandon, N. P.; Skinner, S.; Steele, B. C. H. Annu. ReV. Mater. Res.
2
003, 33, 183-213. (b) Rao, C. R. K.; Trivedi, D. C. Coord. Chem. ReV.
2
005, 249, 613-631.
(
3) (a) Ahmadi, T. S.; Wang, Z. L.; Green, T. C.; Henglein, A.; El-Sayed,
M. A. Science 1996, 272, 1924-1926. (b) Yamada, M.; Kon, S.; Miyake,
M. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 1050-1051.
(
4) (a) Herricks, T.; Chen, J.; Xia, Y. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2367-2371. (b)
Song, H.; Kim, F.; Connor, S.; Somorjai, G. A.; Yang, P. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2005, 109, 188-193. (c) Chen, J.; Herricks, T.; Xia, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2589-2592.
(
5) (a) Niesz, K.; Grass, M.; Somorjai, G. A. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2238-
2240. (b) Lee, H.; Habas, S. E.; Kweskin, S.; Butcher, D.; Somorjai, G.
A.; Yang, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7824-7828.
2 4
1.5 M H SO for 1 h at room temperature. It contains numerous
(
6) Solla-Gull o´ n, J.; Montiel, V.; Aldaz, A.; Clavilier, J. J. Electroanal. Chem.
2000, 491, 69-77.
carbon fibers for catalyst loading. The hexane dispersion of the 8
nm Pt nanocubes was dropped onto the carbon paper (2 × 2 cm),
and hexane was allowed to evaporate, leaving nanocube deposition
on the carbon fibers. Figure 2A is the high-resolution scanning
electron microscopic (HRSEM) image of a specific carbon fiber
in the carbon paper showing the presence of 8 nm Pt nanocubes.
The nanocubes were treated with UV irradiation (wavelength at
(7) Teng, X.; Yang, H. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 885-891.
(
8) (a) Mayers, B.; Jiang, X.; Sunderland, D.; Cattle, B.; Xia, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 13364-13365. (b) Chen, J.; Herricks, T.; Geissler, M.;
Xia, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10854-10855. (c) Chen, J.; Xiong,
Y.; Yin, Y.; Xia, Y. Small 2006, 2, 1340-1343.
(
9) (a) Sattler, M. L.; Ross, P. N. Ultramicroscopy 1986, 20, 21-28. (b)
Kinoshita, K. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 845-848. (c) Markovic,
N. M.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Ross, P. N., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 3411-
3415.
1
85 and 254 nm in air for 24 h) to remove the surfactants and then
sandwiched between two Teflon plates with Au to form a working
electrode that was immersed into a 1.5 M H SO aqueous solution
308 K) under constant gas bubbling. Ag/AgCl and Au wire were
(
10) (a) Zhang, J.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Xu, Y.; Mavrikakis, M.; Adzic, R. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2132-2135. (b) El-Deab, M. S.; Ohsaka,
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5963-5966.
2
4
(11) (a) Chen, M.; Liu, J. P.; Sun, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8394-
(
8
395. (b) Chen, M.; Kim, J.; Liu, J. P.; Fan, H.; Sun, S. J. Am. Chem.
used as reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The potential
was scanned from 1.0 to 0.2 V (vs normal hydrogen electrode,
NHE) with a scan rate of 5 mV/s. Under nitrogen bubbling, the
CV of both commercial Pt catalyst and 8 nm Pt nanocubes was
measured, as shown in Figure 2B, and was used to estimate the
surface area of the catalysts.13 Unlike the commercial Pt catalyst,
the CV of the 8 nm Pt nanocube assembly in Figure 2B shows a
peak at 0.27 V which originates from the hydrogen desorption on
Soc. 2006, 128, 7132-7133.
(
12) Supporting Information.
(
13) (a) Watanabe, M.; Tomikawa, M.; Motoo, S. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1985,
1
82, 193-196. (b) Watanabe, M.; Tomikawa, M.; Motoo, S. J. Electroa-
nal. Chem. 1985, 195, 81-93. (c) Watanabe, M.; Makita, K.; Usami, H.;
Motoo, S. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1986, 197, 195-208. The surface area
2
was estimated to be 300.62 cm for 3.5 mg of 8 nm Pt nanocubes, and
2
1155.95 cm for 3.2 mg of commercial Pt catalyst.
(14) Motto, S.; Furuya, N. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1987, 91, 457-461.
JA070440R
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 22, 2007 6975