ARTICLE IN PRESS
ˇ ˇ
´
I. Potocnak et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 182 (2009) 196–202
201
ln(2S+1) ¼ 5.76 J Kꢀ1 molꢀ1 for magnetic systems with spin
unit. The UV–VIS spectrum of 1 indicates the presence of six-
coordinated Cu(II) atoms in the form of deformed octahedrons
what was definitely confirmed by an X-ray analysis. The structure
is formed by infinite zigzag covalent chains, parallel to the a axis,
which are bound into sheets, lying in ab plane, by relatively weak
hydrogen bonds of N–H?N type.
S ¼ 1/2. The magnetic entropy removed above T represents 86%
l
of the total magnetic entropy suggesting a low-dimensional
character of the studied systems.
Considering the topology of covalent and possible HBs, the
magnetic specific heat of [Cu(bmen)2][Pt(CN)4] has been com-
pared to the theoretical models for a HAF linear-chain [34], an
isotropic HAF square-lattice [35,36] and quasi-2D HAF square-
lattice magnet [37] (Fig. 6). The exchange coupling parameters
obtained from the comparison are J/kB ¼ ꢀ0.77 and ꢀ0.6 K for the
HAF linear-chain model and the HAF square-lattice model,
respectively. Despite the chain-like crystal structure of the title
compound better agreement is obtained for the HAF square lattice
models, suggesting the dominant role of HBs mediating the
exchange interaction in the directions of the magnetic dx2ꢀy2
orbitals oriented within the equatorial plane of the local
octahedron of the Cu(II) atoms. The values of the exchange
couplings are in good agreement with the estimate of the effective
strength of the exchange coupling from the Curie constant.
As mentioned above, no magnetic long-range order at any
finite temperature should be observed for an isotropic 2D HAF
The analysis of the magnetic properties of 1 suggests that
although having a chain-like crystal structure, the title compound
exhibits
a 2D magnetic structure with exchange coupling
J/kB ¼ ꢀ0.6 K, including the influence of very weak interlayer
exchange coupling. The 2D magnetic structure can be explained
by the fact that the magnetic dx2ꢀy2 orbital is oriented within the
equatorial plane of the local octahedron due to the Jahn-Teller
distortion and is not involved in the covalent bonds. Consequently,
the exchange path between the Cu(II) atoms is preferred through
hydrogen bonds creating a square network and not through the
covalent bonds within the chains.
Supplementary material
CCDC 692343 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via
Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033;
e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
model [12] and the origin of the
l-like anomaly should be
discussed. First, we estimate the value of a possible exchange
anisotropy
D
/J ¼ ((gJꢀg )/g)2 ¼ 0.0027, where J? ¼ (1+
D)J, in-
?
duced by the anisotropy of the g-factor [38]. Even such a weak
easy-axis exchange anisotropy leads to a 2D long-range order of
Ising type [13]. Nevertheless, the estimated value of the exchange
coupling J/kB ¼ ꢀ0.6 K for the square-lattice model is about 2/3 of
the expected value for a 2D Ising transition to appear at 0.22 K
[13]. In addition, the effect of a very weak interlayer interaction in
a 2D HAF is to induce a transition to a 3D long-range ordered state
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Grants of the Slovak Grant
Agency VEGA nos. 1/0079/08 and 1/3027/06, by the Research and
Development Support Agency APVV nos. 0006-07 and 0058-07.
Part of this work was supported by the DFG. One of the authors
(M.V.) thanks DAAD for financial support and hospitality of
Martin-Luther-University. The financial support of US Steel—DZ
at finite temperature with a tiny
work of Sengupta [37]. The height of the maximum at Tmax ¼ 0.37
K and the position of the
-like anomaly at T ¼ 0.22 K suggests
l-like anomaly as shown in the
l
l
the influence of an interlayer coupling with a strength less then
J
¼ 10 mK (J /J ¼ 2ꢀ6). In the range 0.001pJ /Jp1 we can
?
?
?
ˇ
Energetika Kosice is acknowledged.
estimate the interlayer coupling from the critical temperature
using the formula T ¼ 4prS/[2.43ꢀln(J /J)], where rS ¼ 0.183J is
l
?
the spin stiffness [39], resulting in J ¼ 6.5 mK. This value is
?
Appendix A. Supplementary material
slightly higher than the maximum magnitude of the dipolar
interaction between the layers, Jdip ¼ 2.5 mK, estimated using a
simple approach [40].
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
To elucidate the exact role of the anisotropy and the interlayer
interaction in the formation of the magnetic long-range order at T
l
it would be necessary to study the critical coefficients in the
vicinity of the critical temperature, which was not possible from
the measurements on the powdered sample due to the rounding
References
[1] M. Pilkington, S. Decurtins, in: A. McCleverty, T.J. Meyer (Eds.), Comprehen-
sive Coordination Chemistry II, Vol. 7, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004.
effects at the l-like anomaly. In the case of an isotropic 2D HAF a
non-monotonous field dependence of the critical temperature is
expected with a field-induced easy-plane behavior [41,42]. A more
complex phase diagram is obtained when an easy-axis anisotropy
is present with an Ising-type 2D ordering in the low-field region
followed by a field-induced XY-like phase at higher magnetic
fields [43–45]. To carry out such measurements in a wide range of
magnetic fields and at very low temperatures is rather difficult
and time consuming and is planned in the future.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ ˇ ´
ˇ
´ ˇ
´
ˇ
[2] J. Cerna´k, M. Orenda´c, I. Potocnak, J. Chomic, A. Orendacova, J. Skorsepa,
A. Feher, Coord. Chem. Rev. 224 (2002) 51.
[3] S. Tanase, J. Reedijg, Coord. Chem. Rev. 250 (2006) 2501.
[4] I. Muga, J.M. Gutierrez-Zorrilla, P. Vitoria, P. Roman, L. Lezama, J.I. Beitia, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. (2004) 1886.
ˇ
ˇ ˇ ´
ˇ
´
´
´ ˇ
´
[5] I. Potocnak, M. Vavra, E. Cizmar, K. Tibenska, A. Orendacova, D. Steinborn, Ch.
+
ˇ
´
´ ˇ
Wagner, M. Dusek, K. Fejfarova, H. Schmidt, T. Muller, M. Orendac, A. Feher,
J. Solid State Chem. 179 (2006) 1965.
[6] J.P. Zhang, R.S. Wang, M. Baumgarten, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 306 (1997) 119.
[7] R. Boca, Coord. Chem. Rev. 173 (1998) 167.
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
´ ˇ
´
´
[8] M. Orenda´c, A. Orendacova, J. Cernak, A. Feher, Solid State Commun. 94 (1995)
833.
ˇ
ˇ
´ ˇ
´ ˇ
´
[9] J. Cerna´k, J. Skorsepa, K.A. Abboud, M.W. Meisel, M. Orendac, A. Orendacova,
4. Conclusions
A. Feher, Inorg. Chim. Acta 326 (2001) 3.
ˇ
ˇ
´
ˇ
[10] J. Kucha´r, J. Cerna´k, Z. Mayerova´, P. Kuba´cek, Z. Zak, Solid State Phenom. 90
(2003) 328.
By a relatively facile way a new compound, [Cu(bmen)2]
[Pt(CN)4] (1), was prepared. The presence of individual functional
groups and the composition of 1 were proved by infrared
spectroscopy and CHN analysis. The study of thermal properties
of 1 showed a three-step decomposition consisting of liberation of
two bmen molecules and three cyano groups from one formula
ˇ
ˇ
´ ˇ
´
´
´
´ ˇ
´
[11] J. Hanko, M. Orendac, J. Kuchar, Z. Zak, J. Cernak, A. Orendacova, A. Feher, Solid
State Commun. 142 (2007) 128.
[12] N. Mermin, H. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966) 1133.
[13] A. Cuccoli, T. Roscilde, V. Tognetti, R. Vaia, P. Verrucchi, Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003)
104414.
[14] V.L. Berezinskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 59 (1970) 907.
[15] V.L. Berezinskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61 (1971) 1144.