C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
(Pluronic surfactants) was known to form a crown-ethers-like
conformation, similar to a cavity structure in aqueous solution.7a
The hydrophobic PPO groups in the Pluronic polymer were
favorably adsorbed onto the surface of the deposited metal
surface.7,9 The Pluronic chains adsorbed on the Pt surface during
the Pt deposition in this system could form cavities and then
facilitate the formation of the DPNs. It was worth noting that the
used Pluronic F127 concentration was lower than its critical micelle
concentration (CMC).7a,b Ill-defined DPNs were produced by using
a Pluronic F127 concentration over its CMC (Figure S11). Over
CMC, the PPO groups existed in the core of the micelles and the
hydrophilic PEO groups were exposed on the micelles. Therefore,
the PPO groups could not effectively adsorb on the Pt surface during
the Pt deposition, which was unfavorable for dendritic growth.
Under the current system, a low Pt concentration (1 mM) resulted
in irregular nanoparticles (Figure S12A) and relatively higher Pt
precursor concentrations were favorable for facilitating the produc-
tion of DPNs in high yield and high quality (Figure S12B-D).
In summary, DPNs were straightforwardly synthesized in high
yield via a one-step aqueous-phase reaction mediated by block
copolymer under mild conditions. The proposed method was unique
in its simplicity. As-prepared DPNs possessed the highest surface
area of all reported unsupported Pt materials. Traditionally, block
copolymers could be utilized as direct templates for synthesis of
silica-13 and metal-based5 mesoporous materials. The proposed
block copolymer mediated synthesis might open a new door toward
creation of novel metal-based dendritic materials. We expect that
this synthetic concept could be a new bridge between two frontline
disciplines: block copolymer systems and dendritic metal design.
Figure 2. HRTEM image of one DPN (left) and filtered image of the square
area (right). The domain boundaries are indicated by the arrows.
highest value 53 m2 g-1 for unsupported Pt materials.4 This value
is very close to the value 57 m2 g-1, calculated roughly for the
surface areas of nanowires with 3.25 nm in average diameter,
indicating that the inner edge and corner area are truly accessible
from outside. Such a high surface area was created from the
branches with 3-3.5 nm tips. The combination of high surface area
with the nanoarchitectures consisting of edges is advantageous for
catalytic applications.
For comparison, the specific surface areas of Pt black range from
11
20 to 28 m2 g-1
.
Porous Pt nanoparticles synthesized at 210 °C
using a complicated organic phase showed a surface area of 14 m2
g-1 6a Although multiarmed Pt nanostars with high catalytic activity
.
could be prepared by using tetrahedral Pt nanocrystals as seeds,
the size distribution was varied.6b Therefore, this synthetic strategy
can be proposed as a more simple, rapid, and straightforward
method for synthesis of DPNs with high surface areas and high
yield.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by WPI, MEXT
of Japan and partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 19850031) from JSPS and the Murata Science
Foundation.
To help understand the process of shape evolution in this system,
two intermediate products harvested at two different times during
the reaction solution kept in the brown color stage (Stage B in
Figure S1), which was most likely the rapid growth period, were
observed by TEM (Figure S9). As Figure S9A displayed at the
earlier harvested time, AA reduced the Pt complex precursor to
yield initial irregular particles with sprouts in random directions
formed likely by aggregation of discrete Pt nanoparticles. As the
reaction proceeded, the particle size continued to increase and
secondary branches began to grow from the bodies and main
branches due to the continuous precursor reduction, leading to the
growth of the immature particles to a size of ∼6 nm at the later
harvested time (Figure S9B). Such growth continuously occurred
as the reaction proceeded until complete consumption of the Pt
precursor in the reaction solution. At ∼10 min, the color of the
reaction color remained stable opaque black, suggesting that the
reaction was complete, and the mature structures of the nanoparticles
were obtained (Figure 1). This type of crystal growth was previously
observed for the formation of hyperbranched Ag nanostructures.12
To understand the role of Pluronic F127 in this system,
investigations were done by replacing Pluronic F127 with different
surfactants (Figure S10). Based on these investigations, it was
known that Pluronic surfactants were critical for the formation of
the DPNs shown in Figure 1. It was reasonable to speculate about
Pluronic F127 molecules serving as a structure-directing agent in
this system. The PEO group in PEO-PPO-PEO surfactants
Supporting Information Available: Preparation process, additional
TEM and photo images, EDX, XRD, SAED, and N2 adsorption/
desorption isotherm data. This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) (a) Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1343. (b) Song,
Y.; Yang, Y.; Medforth, C. J.; Pereira, E.; Singh, A. K.; Xu, H.; Jiang, Y.;
Brinker, C. J.; Swol, F.; Shelnutt, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 635.
(2) Lim, B.; Lu, X. M.; Jiang, M. J.; Camargo, P. H. C.; Cho, E. C.; Lee,
E. P.; Xia, Y. N. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4043.
(3) Bigall, N. C.; Hartling, T.; Klose, M.; Simon, P.; Eng, L. M.; Eychmuller,
A. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4588.
(4) Song, Y. J.; Garcia, R. M.; Dorin, R. M.; Wang, H. R.; Qiu, Y.; Coker,
E. N.; Steen, W. A.; Miller, J. E.; Shelnutt, J. A. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3650.
(5) Yamauchi, Y.; Takai, A.; Nagaura, T.; Inoue, S.; Kuroda, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 5426.
(6) (a) Teng, X. W.; Liang, X. Y.; Maksimuk, S.; Yang, H. Small 2006, 2,
249. (b) Mahmoud, M. A.; Tabor, C. E.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Ding, Y.; Wang,
Z. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4590.
(7) (a) Sakai, T.; Alexandridis, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 7766. (b) Sakai,
T.; Alexandridis, P. Langmuir 2004, 20, 8426. (c) Sakai, T.; Alexandridis,
P. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8019.
(8) Wang, X. G.; Kawanami, H.; Islam, N. M.; Chattergee, M.; Yokoyama,
T.; Ikushima, Y. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4442.
(9) Niesz, K.; Grass, M.; Somorjai, G. A. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2238.
(10) Meier, M. A. R.; Filali, M.; Gohy, J.; Schubert, U. S. J. Mater. Chem.
2006, 16, 3001.
(11) Choi, K. S.; McFarland, E. W.; Stucky, G. D. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 2018.
(12) Wang, Y. L.; Camargo, P. H. C.; Skrabalak, S. E.; Gu, H. C.; Xia, Y. N.
Langmuir 2008, 24, 12042.
(13) Wan, Y.; Zhao, D. Y. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 2821.
JA902485X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 26, 2009 9153