34
I.F. Sengul et al. / Dyes and Pigments 123 (2015) 32e38
F$AStd$n2
was as follows based on literature with a minor revision [29]
(Scheme 1).
F ¼ F ðStdÞ
(1)
F
F
FStd$A$n2
Std
where
F
F
(Std) is the fluorescence quantum yield of standard.
¼ 0.76 in water)
24]. F and FStd are the areas under the fluorescence emission curves
3
.1. Synthesis of compound 4
Rhodamine 6G was employed as the standard (F
F
[
of samples (4 and 5) and the standard, respectively. A and AStd are
the respective absorbance of the samples and standard at the
excitation wavelengths.
solvents used for the sample and standard, respectively. The con-
A 500 mL round bottomed flask was charged with dichloro-
methane (150 mL), and purged with Ar for 20 min. To the flask were
added Compound 1 (0.263 g, 1.18 mmol) and 2,4-dimethylpyrrole
(0.246 g, 2.60 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane and stir-
red 20 min and few drops of trifluoroacetic acid was added to the
reaction mixture and stirred for 2e3 h. 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-
benzoquinone (DDQ) (0.16 g, 0.71 mmol) was dissolved in 80 mL of
dichloromethane and added to the reaction mixture. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and triethyl amine
2
2
Std
h
and h
are the refractive indices of
centration of the solutions at the excitation wavelength fixed at
ꢀ
7
ꢀ3
5
ꢁ 10 mol dm . According to the Eq. (2) [25,26], where
FENT is
the energy transfer quantum yield, F (dyad) and F (donor) are
F
F
the fluorescence quantum yields of the dyad (the donor part) and
the donor without connecting to the acceptor, respectively.
(5 mL, 57 mmol) was added to the mixture drop by drop and stirred
for 30 min. BF3. OEt (5 mL, 66 mmol) was added to the mixture
2
FENT ¼ 1 ꢀ FFðdyadÞ=FFðdonorÞ
.4. Cell culture
HT-29 cells were obtained from SAP Institute (Ankara, TURKEY).
(2)
drop by drop. The reaction mixture was stirred at room tempera-
ture 2e3 h and filtered from G4 sintered filter. Solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. Compound 4 has been isolated from col-
umn chromatography with silica gel (4:1; Hexane: Ethylacetate)
Yield: 72 mg (14%).
2
The cells were grown in phenol red free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
Spectral data of 4: (Found: C 73.45, H 5.96, N 9.54%, C27H26BF N
(441) requires C 73.48, H 5.94, N 9.52%). H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl )
3
2
3
1
medium (DMEM) (high glucose) supplemented with 10% fetal calf
ꢂ
serum,100 units/mL penicillin and 100
in 5% CO
m
g/mL streptomycin at 37 C
d
8.08 (d, J ¼ 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.55e7.51 (m, 2H), 7.48 (d,
2
in humudified incubator in T25 culture flasks. All culture
J ¼ 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (dd, J ¼ 8.3, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29e7.26 (m, 1H), 5.98
media were obtained from Biochrom (Berlin, GERMANY). Before
cell viability assays cells in T25 flasks were grown upon reaching
(s, 2H), 4.43 (t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.59 (s, 6H), 1.51 (t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 3H),
13
3
1.32 (s, 6H). C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl ) d 155.21, 143.51, 143.34,
7
0% in vitro confluency, in the meantime culture media were
140.50, 140.13, 132.44, 126.88, 126.43, 125.46, 125.28, 123.54,
122.78, 121.17, 121.16, 120.74, 120.22, 119.44, 109.19, 108.97, 47.63,
changed every other day. Before quantification assay cells were first
washed with ice-cold Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) solution
twice and then subjected to trypsin enzyme for 5 min at 37 C and
activity of trypsin was stopped by the addition of serum containing
DMEM (7 mL medium per ml of trypsin solution), 10
was taken for cell counting by using hemocytometer and cell
concentration was adjusted to 1 ꢁ 10 cells/100
ꢀ
1
37.97, 29.85, 14.79, 14.74, 14.72, 13.96. IR (ATR) ʋmax (cm ): 2955
(aromatic CH), 2920 (aliphatic CH), 2856 (aliphatic CH), 1601 (ar-
omatic C]C), 1546 (aromatic C]C), 1505 (BeF), 1463 (aliphatic
CH), 1370, (aliphatic CH), 1305 (CeN), 1255, 1190, 1155, 1122, 975,
ꢂ
mL of medium
þ
þ
807, 765, 726. MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z (%): 442 [M þ H] , 423 [MꢀF] .
4
mL culture medium.
3.2. Synthesis of compound 5
2.5. Cell viability assay
A 500 mL round bottomed flask was charged with dichloro-
methane (250 mL), and purged with Ar for 20 min. To the flask were
added Compound 3 (1.25 g, 5 mmol) and 2,4-dimethylpyrrole
2.1 g, 22 mmol) were dissolved in dichloromethane and stirred
0 min and few drops of trifluoroacetic acid was added to the re-
action mixture and stirred for 2e3 h. 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-
benzoquinone (DDQ) (2.26 g, 6 mmol) was dissolved in 150 mL of
dichloromethane and added to the reaction mixture. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 2 h at room temperature and triethyl amine
Cell viability was performed by using MTT (3-(4, 5-
dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) [27]. HT-
4
2
9 cells are plated in 96-well microplates at 1 ꢁ 10 cells/well,
(
2
and incubated overnight for proper attachment in conditions
described elsewhere. Treatments were applied in seven groups in
triplicates along with vehicle control (DMSO only). Cells were
treated with increasing concentrations of mono- and bis-BODIPY
carbazoles 4e5 (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250 ng/mL). Data were gath-
ered over 24 by removing cell culture media from the cells, then
(
5 mL, 57 mmol) was added to the mixture drop by drop and stirred
washing with PBS and adding 100
L of 12 mM MTT reagent (Molecular Probes). Cells were further
incubated 4 h and 100 L of 10% SDS solution prepared from 0.01 M
mL of new media which contains
for 30 min. BF3. OEt (5 mL, 66 mmol) was added to the mixture
2
10 m
drop by drop. The reaction mixture was stirred at room tempera-
ture 2e3 h and filtered from G4 sintered filter. Solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. Compound 5 has been isolated from col-
umn chromatography with silica gel (4:1; Hexane: Ethylacetate)
yield: 350 mg (10%).
m
HCl was added. Absorbances of plates were read spectrophoto-
metrically at 570 nm with automatic micro-plate reader (Bio-RAD).
Average results were obtained and cell viability was calculated
according to the formula below:
Spectral data of 5: (Found: C 69.84, H 5.74, N 10.21%,
1
C
(
40
39
H B
2
F
4
N
5
(687) requires C 69.89, H 5.72, N 10.19%). H NMR
%
Cell viability ¼ ½ðAbsorbance of treated cellsÞ=
500 MHz, CDCl
3
)
d
7.94 (s, 2H), 7.58 (d, J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (d,
J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.97 (s, 4H), 4.48 (q, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (s,12H),1.59
ꢁ
ꢁ
ðAbsorbace of controls untreated cellsÞꢃ
100
1
3
(
1
d, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (s, 12H). C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl
3
) d 155.49,
55.25, 143.49, 143.07, 142.77, 142.61, 142.14, 140.40, 126.10, 125.76,
1
25.74, 121.11, 120.28, 109.38, 47.49, 29.68, 14.78, 14.58. FT-IR (ATR)
ꢀ1
3
. Synthesis
ʋmax (cm ): 2958 (aromatic CH), 2923 (aliphatic CH), 2853
(aliphatic CH), 1541 (aromatic C]C), 1505 (BeF), 1469 (aliphatic
Compounds 2 and 3 were prepared according to procedures
described previously [28]. The synthesis procedure of compound 6
CH), 1409, (aliphatic CH), 1305 (CeN), 1190, 1155, 973, 807, 765, 726.
MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z (%): 688 [M þ H] , 669 [MꢀF] .
þ
þ