Chemistry Letters 2002
1143
triphenylphosphine as a ligand in diethyl ether, although the
soluble complex of cuprous bromide was not formed at the initial
stage of mixing, was examined, resulting in the better yield than
that in the reaction using tributylphosphine (Table 1, run 2 and 7).
Methyl alkanoates other than methyl propionate also gave
1,2-adducts with 1a in the reaction in a diethyl ether solution
containing cuprous bromide and triphenylphosphine.12 N,N-
dimethylacetamide similarly effected the 1,2-adduct, although in
a lower yield (54%) compared with methyl acetate being the
corresponding ester analogue. The reactions of methyl propionate
with ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated ketones other than 1a were in turn
performed to afford the 1,2-adducts. These results are shown in
Table 2, in which the reactions afforded the 1,2-adducts 3 (e.g.,
run, 5, 7, and 9) in moderate yields with some starting materials
remained 1.
acids. Thus, peculiar promotion with the copper(I)-phosphine
complex probably operates in our reaction to effect selective
formation of the 1,2-adducts, and it might be likely as a working
hypothesis that simultaneous coordination of the conjugated
enone and the ketene silyl acetal to the copper(I)-phosphine
complex triggers the 1,2-addition reaction, although the precise
mechanism is unclear at this stage.
Our method necessitates the use of a stoichiometric amount
of the copper(I)halide-phosphine complex, which might be owing
to its relatively low Lewis acidity as revealed by requisition of
rather severe reaction conditions (reflux, 4 h). Thus, possibility
that the 1,2-addition reaction of this type may be catalytically
performed by using the phosphine complexes of metal species
bearing the enhanced Lewis acidities compared with CuBr
remains to be investigated. Furthermore, for development of the
asymmetric version, the reaction using the chiral phosphine
complexes will be a target to be challenged.
Table 2. Reaction of ꢀ,ꢁ-unsaturated ketones with ketene silyl
acetals generated in situ
References and Notes
1
B. J. Wakefield, ‘‘Organolithium Methods,’’ Academic Press,
London (1994), p 71; R. E. Luta and C. L. Dickerson, J. Org.
Chem., 27, 2040 (1962); H. O. House, W. L. Respess, and G. M.
Whitesides, J. Org. Chem., 31, 3128 (1966).
2
H. O. House and W. F. Fiscer, Jr., J. Org. Chem., 33, 949
(1968); H. O. House, Acc. Chem. Res., 9, 59 (1976); B. E.
Rossiter and N. M. Swingle, Chem. Rev., 92, 771 (1992); B. H.
Lipshutz and S. Sengupta, Org. React., 41, 135 (1992); A. S.
Vellekoop and R. A. J. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 2902
(1994).
3
E. D. Bergman, D. Gunsberg, and R. Rappo, Org. React., 10,
179 (1959).
4
5
P. A. Zoretic and J. Chiang, J. Org. Chem., 42, 2103 (1977).
J. L. Herrman, J. E. Richman, and R. H. Schlessinger,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1973, 3271.
6
G. Stork and L. Maldonado, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 5272 (1974);
T. Strzalko, J. Seyden-Penne, and L. Wartski, J. Org. Chem., 63,
3295 (1998).
7P. C. Ostrowski and V. V. Kane, Tetrahedron Lett., 1977, 3549.
8
9
A. G. Schultz and Y. K. Yee, J. Org. Chem., 41, 4045 (1976).
K. Narasaka, K. Soai, Y. Aikawa, and T. Mukaiyama, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 49, 779 (1976); K. Saigo, M. Okazaki, and T.
Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 1976, 163.
10 M. Mitani and Y. Osakabe, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1994, 1759.
11 Spectral data of 3a: 1H NMR(CDCl3/CCl4, 60 MHz) ꢂ 0.04 (s,
9H), 1.08 (d, J ¼ 6:8 Hz, 3H), 1.52–2.31 (m, 6H), 2.55 (q,
J ¼ 6:8 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 5.98 (br.s, 2H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3/CCl4, 15 MHz) ꢂ 1.90, 12.77, 25.06, 31.64, 32.83,
49.14, 50.76, 134.32, 134.86; MS (EI) m/z (%) 256 (0.5, Mþ),
241 (50), 170 (100), 145 (94), 107 (75), 89 (98), 73 (96); HRMS
m/z Calcd for C13H24O3Si 256.1493, Found 256.1521.
12 A typical experiment is as follows. To a solution consisting of an
ester (3.3 mmol), TMSCl (8 mmol) and Et2O (5 ml), LDA
(3.3 mmol, 2.0 mol dmꢁ3 in heptane/THF/ethylbenzene) was
added under nitrogen atmosphere at 0 ꢂC and stirred for 30 min.
Then, a conjugated enone (2 mmol), CuBr (2 mmol) and PPh3
(4 mmol) were successively added and the reaction mixture was
refluxed for 4 h. After the solid parts were filtered off, the filtrate
was submitted to preparative VPC.
Concerning the reaction mechanism, the activating effect of
the Lewis acid such as titanium tetrachloride on the reaction of
conjugated enones with silyl enol ethers has been assumed to be
brought about by coordination to the oxygen atom of the
conjugated enone to enhance its electrophilicity and facilitate
attack by silyl enol ethers to form the 1,4-adducts.13 Actually, use
of cuprous chloride alone in our reaction also brought about the
1,4-adduct similarly to promotion by the conventional Lewis
13 C. H. Heathcock, M. H. Norman, and D. E. Uehling, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 107, 2797 (1985).