4972
A.O. Okunola et al. / Electrochimica Acta 54 (2009) 4971–4978
competition mode of SECM (RC-SECM) where the tip and the sam-
ple under investigation are made to compete for the same analyte
in solution in a bipotentiostatic measurement has been suggested
[31]. In this case, the current at the tip is used as analytical signal.
This approach helped to overcome the challenge observed in the
TG-SC mode where a significant contribution of the background
signal at larger samples limits the possibility of high resolution
imaging [29]. In the RC-SECM mode, the local concentration of O2
in the gap between SECM tip and sample is kept high by applying
repetitive water splitting potential pulses to the tip before the deter-
mination of O2 reduction activity. The RC-SECM image is generally
obtained in such a manner that the oxygen reduction at the tip will
lead to a constant current signal until the tip is scanned across an
O2 consuming site of the sample. This consumption alters the local
was purchased from VWR, Darmstadt, Germany; K2HPO4·3H2O
from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany; meso-tetratolyl porphyrin-
Co(II) (CoTTP) from Porphyrin Systems (Lübeck, Germany). TBABF4
(tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate) was from Fluka (Buchs,
Switzerland); N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was from J.T. Baker
(Deventer, The Netherlands). For the synthesis of metallo-
porphyrins, substituted benzaldehydes, trifluoroboron etherate
(BF3·OEt2), tetraphenylchlorophosphate (Ph4PCl) were obtained
benzoqui none and pyrrole were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich
(Steinheim, Germany). All chemicals were of analytical grade and
used as received. MnTTP and FeTTP were prepared from a one-
flask synthesis of porphyrins which followed a standard literature
protocol [34–38].
O2 concentration and hence the diffusional fluxes of O2 towards the
SECM tip thereby leading to a decrease in the current flow through
the tip. The electrocatalytic properties of the sample are therefore
reflected by the modulation of the current signal at the SECM tip.
SECM imaging of local O2 reduction has generally elucidated
the local catalytic activity of a sample but does not provide infor-
mation on the number of electrons involved in the ORR, which
is represented by the formed reaction products. The selectivity of
a catalytically active sample either towards a 4-electron (respec-
tively sequential 2 × 2-electron) reduction of oxygen to H2O or a
2-electron reduction to H2O2 is of high importance for the opti-
mization of potential electrocatalysts. Recently, a sequential dual
imaging mode of the SECM was introduced in which it was possible
to conduct a simultaneous visualization of both the local electrocat-
alytic activity and the selectivity of the investigated catalyst [32]. In
image elucidates the activity of the sample towards oxygen reduc-
tion and the other visualizes the produced (if any) H2O2 during the
ORR.
In a preceding publication [33], we investigated the properties
of electrodeposited2 metalloporphyrins with respect to their elec-
trocatalytic activity for O2 reduction and were able to demonstrate
the advantages of the electrochemically induced deposition of met-
alloporphyrins as compared with dip- or drop-coating processes for
electrode modification.
In this contribution, SECM is applied to investigate the elec-
trocatalytic behavior of electrodeposited metalloporphyrins films
on electrode surfaces towards O2 reduction. Tetratolyl porphyrins
(TTPs) which contain Mn, Fe and Co as central metal ions have
been investigated. The impact of the catalyst loading, which was
varied during the electrochemical deposition of the metallopor-
phyrin layers, that of the central metal ion on the catalytic behavior
of these metalloporphyrins towards ORR as well as their selec-
tivity towards electrocatalytic reduction of O2 was investigated.
Comparing results from SECM and rotating disc electrode (RDE)
measurements made it possible to further elucidate the mechanism
of catalytic O2 reduction.
2.2. SECM measurements
The SECM instrumentation has been described before [39]. The
main components are stepper motor driven x–y–z stages (Owis,
Staufen, Germany), a bi-potentiostat (PG 100; Jaissle, Waiblingen,
Germany) and an in-house written control software programmed
under Visual Basic 6.0 (Microsoft, Unterschleißheim. Germany). All
SECM measurements were carried out in 0.1 M phosphate buffer
which was prepared by mixing 0.1 M KH2PO4 and 0.1 M K2HPO4
(1:1) in triply distilled de-ionized water and adjusting the pH
value to 7. A buffered solution has been chosen in order to avoid
any unwanted influence of pH changes due to the ORR. Pt-micro-
electrodes (Ø = 25 m) used as SECM tips were fabricated according
to an earlier established procedure [40] using Pt wire purchased
from Goodfellow (Bad Nauheim, Germany). Other components of
the electrochemical cell include a miniaturized Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl ref-
erence electrode, to which all potentials in this work refer, a Pt-foil
as counter electrode and an indium-tin-oxide (ITO)-coated glass
plate.
During the redox competition mode of SECM the sequential
pulse profile applied to the SECM tip was: +50 mV for 500 ms (no-
effect potential), +1200 mV for 200 ms (O2 production), −600 mV
for 500 ms (O2 reduction and data acquisition), +1200 mV for
200 ms (O2 production) and +600 mV for 500 ms (H2O2 oxidation
and data acquisition).
2.3. Sample preparation
The metalloporphyrin spots were prepared by
electrodeposition from 3 mM solution of each metallopor-
a pulsed
a
phyrin in 0.1 M TBABF4 in DMF. The spots were deposited
on a Sigradur® (HTW Hochtemperatur-Werkstoffe, Thierhaupten,
Germany) glassy carbon (GC) plate in a specially designed electro-
chemical droplet cell composed of a Pt wire as counter electrode
and a Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl electrode as reference electrode, adapted
from the work of Hassel et al. [41]. Each pulse applied in the droplet
cell for the electrochemical deposition of the metalloporphyrin fol-
lowed a sequential potential profile of 0 V for 2 s, 1.6 V for 3 s and
0 V for 2 s. In our previous work, the number of pulses was varied
between 10, 20, 30 and 50 pulses to control the catalyst loading on
the GC plate, and 20 pulses turned out to be the optimum [33]. Thus,
20 deposition pulses were used if not otherwise stated through-
out the study. Since the electrodeposition occurs via ring oxidation,
and the ring system is the same in all systems, we assume that
similar amounts of porphyrin are deposited in all cases. This is
further supported by the similarity of the CVs obtained on the vari-
ous metalloporphyrins in the potential region where ring oxidation
takes place [33]. The metalloporphyrin spots were left to dry briefly
and the GC plate was rinsed carefully with DMF to remove loosely
attached material. The spot was then left to air-dry. Fig. 1 shows a
schematic representation of the electrochemical droplet cell.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The metalloporphyrins used (both commercially purchased
and locally synthesized) are abbreviated as follows: manganese
TTP (MnTTP), iron TTP (FeTTP) and cobalt TTP (CoTTP). KH2PO4
2
Very often the term “electropolymerization” can be found in literature for
the electrochemical deposition of metallo-porphyrins and -phthalocyanins. In this
paper, however, the more general term “electrodeposition” is used. In this electrode-
position, likely first a radical cation is formed by oxidation, which attacks a second
porphyrin to form a dimer and so on. The exact structure and mechanism, however,
is not clear.