M. Lelle, K. Peneva
Consecutively DIPEA (2.76 g, 3.63 ml, 21.37 mmol) and 3
1.23 g, 4.27 mmol) were added and the solution was
(2 H, m, CH CHOCHO), 2.24–2.15 (2 H, m, CH CHO-
2
2
(
CHO), 1.89–1.82 (2 H, m, NH CHCH ), 1.68–1.58 (3 H,
2 2
stirred for 3 h under argon at room temperature. The
reaction mixture was diluted with 300 ml ethyl acetate and
washed twice with 0.2 M hydrochloric acid as well as
brine. The organic layer was dried with magnesium sulfate
and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Afterwards the obtained residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography using ethyl acetate/methanol
m, NH CHCH , CHCH ), 1.48–1.41 (1 H, m, CHCH ),
2 2 2 2
1.36–1.28 (2 H, m, NHCH CH CH ), 1.20–1.12 (8 H, m,
2
2
2
MeCH, NHCH CH CH ); m/z (MALDI-TOF) 1,533.07
2
2
2
?
[M ? Na] .
Thiolated IgG (12). A solution of IgG (5 mg,
0.035 lmol) in 500 ll 0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 7.2) con-
taining 0.15 M NaCl and 10 mM EDTA was prepared. The
thiolation reagent 11 (0.96 mg) was dissolved in 1 ml of
the same buffer mixture and 50 ll (0.348 lmol) was added
to the IgG solution. Afterwards the reaction mixture was
incubated in an Eppendorf Thermomixer (300 rpm) at
37 °C for 90 min. This solution was transferred into 500 ll
ultrafiltration devices Amicon Ultra (MWCO 10 kDa) and
concentrated in an Eppendorf MiniSpin Plus centrifuge
(5 min, 10.000 rpm) to 100 ll. Subsequently 400 ll of
0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 7.4) was added and spun again at
10.000 rpm for 5 min. This procedure was repeated one
more time and the thiolated antibody was obtained in
100 ll of a viscous buffer solution (5 mg, 0.035 lmol,
quantitative yield).
(
(
15:1) and the product was isolated as a colorless solid
6
1.14 g, 1.73 mmol, 81 %). d (300 MHz; DMSO-d )
H
1
0.32 (1 H, s, CONHO), 10.29 (1 H, s, CONHO),
8
.50–8.41 (1 H, m, NCH), 8.24 (1 H, t, J = 5.4 Hz,
CHCONH), 8.10 (1 H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, CHNH), 7.98 (1 H, t,
J = 5.4 Hz, OCH CONH), 7.89–7.70 (2 H, m, SCCH,
2
SCCHCH), 7.29–7.18 (1 H, m, NCHCH), 4.38–4.08 (3 H,
m, CHNH, NHOCH ), 4.12 (2 H, s, NHOCH ), 3.49–3.19
2
2
(
2 H, m, CH CH S), 3.08 (2 H, q, J = 6.6 Hz,
2 2
NHCH CH CH ), 2.89 (2 H, t, J = 6.6 Hz, CH CH S),
2
2
2
2
2
1
.71–1.48 (2 H, m, CHCH ), 1.47–1.34 (2 H, m,
2
NHCH CH CH ), 1.33–1.21 (2 H, m, NHCH CH CH ),
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
1
1
8
2
.40 (18 H, s, CH ); d (75 MHz; DMSO-d ) 171.3, 167.9,
3
C
67.7, 159.1, 157.0, 156.9, 149.6, 137.8, 121.2, 119.3,
IgG doxorubicin conjugate (13).
9
(1.05 mg,
0.6, 80.6, 74.8, 74.6, 52.0, 38.0, 37.8, 37.3, 31.8, 28.7,
?
7.9, 22.7; m/z (MALDI-TOF) 661.11 [M ? H] .
0.695 lmol) was gradually dissolved in 500 ll of 0.1 M
PBS buffer (pH 7.4) and added to 100 ll of the thiolated
IgG (5 mg, 0.035 lmol) solution. The reaction mixture
was incubated in an Eppendorf Thermomixer (300 rpm) for
3 h at 37 °C and subsequently purified by GPC on Bio-Gel
P-2 with 0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The obtained red
product fraction was concentrated in an Eppendorf Mini-
Spin Plus centrifuge (10.000 rpm) to 100 ll (5 mg,
0.035 lmol, quantitative yield).
Dimeric doxorubicin bioconjugate (9). The cross-linker
(217.5 mg, 330 lmol) was dissolved in 10 ml of dry
1
DCM and gradually 10 ml of TFA was added. The solu-
tion was stirred for 1 h at room temperature and subse-
quently the solvent mixture was removed under reduced
pressure.
Doxorubicin
hydrochloride
(421.1 mg,
7
26 lmol) was dissolved in 80 ml DMF/sodium acetate
buffer (1:1)—pH 4.8 and was added to the oily residue.
Afterwards the reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at
room temperature and the crude product was purified by
GPC on Bio-Gel P-2 using 25 mM TEAA buffer (pH 7) as
eluent. The isolated fractions were additionally purified by
RP-HPLC and the product was obtained as a red solid
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
References
after precipitation in diethyl ether (354.2 mg, 234.3 lmol,
Ackerson CJ, Jadzinsky PD, Jensen GJ, Kornberg RD (2006) Rigid,
specific, and discrete gold nanoparticle/antibody conjugates.
J Am Chem Soc 128(8):2635–2640
Alley SC, Okeley NM, Senter PD (2010) Antibody-drug conjugates:
targeted drug delivery for cancer. Curr Opin Chem Biol
6
7
1 %). d (700 MHz; DMSO-d ) 8.42–8.38 (1 H, m,
H
NCH), 8.17 (1 H, t, J = 4.9 Hz, CHCONH), 7.94 (1 H, d,
J = 7.7 Hz, CHNH), 7.82–7.73 (5 H, m, SCCHCH,
MeOCCHCHCH), 7.72–7.66 (2 H, m, OCH CONH,
2
1
4(4):529–537
SCCH), 7.51 (1 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, MeOCCH), 7.47 (1 H,
d, J = 7.0 Hz, MeOCCH), 7.22–7.17 (1 H, m, NCHCH),
Aslam M, Dent A (1998) Bioconjugation: protein coupling techniques
for the biomedical sciences. Macmillan, London
Astriab-Fisher A, Sergueev D, Fisher M, Shaw BR, Juliano RL (2002)
Conjugates of antisense oligonucleotides with the Tat and
antennapedia cell-penetrating peptides: effects on cellular
uptake, binding to target sequences, and biologic actions. Pharm
Res 19(6):744–754
Brocchini S, Godwin A, Balan S, Choi J, Zloh M, Shaunak S (2008)
Disulfide bridge based PEGylation of proteins. Adv Drug Deliv
Rev 60:3–12
5
4
.24–5.17 (2 H, m, CHOCHO), 5.16–5.04 (2 H, br s, OH),
.78–4.73 (1 H, m, CHOCHO), 4.72–4.66 (1 H, m,
CHOCHO), 4.46–4.28 (8 H, m, NOCH , N = CCH ),
2
2
4
3
3
.19–4.05 (3 H, m, CHNH, MeCH), 3.91 (3 H, s, MeO),
.87 (3 H, s, MeO), 3.62–3.56 (2 H, m, MeCHCH),
.39–3.20 (6 H, m, OHCHCHNH2, CH CH S,
2
2
OHCCCH ), 3.05–2.89 (4 H, m, OHCCCH , NHCH
2
2
2
Carlsson J, Drevin H, Axen R (1978) Protein thiolation and reversible
Protein-Protein
CH CH ), 2.84 (2 H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, CH CH S), 2.43–2.32
2
conjugation.
N-Succinimidyl
3-(2-
2
2
2
1
23