614
GRISHCHUK et al.
Table 1. Yields, constants, and elemental analyses of 1-acryloyloxy-4-(2-chloro-3-arylpropyonyloxy)butanes I and II
and 1-acryloyloxy-2-[2-(2-chloro-3-arylpropyonyloxy)ethoxy]ethanes III and IV
MRD
Comp.
no.
Yield,
%
Found,
Cl, %
Calculated
Cl, %
2
0
20
n
d
Formula
D
4
found
calculated
I
II
III
IV
41
45
44
38
1.5153
1.5144
1.5085
1.5197
1.1623
1.1429
1.1815
1.1840
80.67
85.61
82.51
87.46
80.94
85.77
82.69
87.51
11.35
10.80
10.66
10.19
C H ClO
11.41
10.92
10.85
10.40
1
6
19
4
4
5
5
C H ClO
17 21
C H ClO
16 19
C H ClO
1
7 21
1
Table 2. IR and H NMR spectral data for 1-acryloyloxy-4-(2-chloro-3-arylpropyonyloxy)butanes I and II and 1-acryloyl-
oxy-2-[2-(2-chloro-3-arylpropyonyloxy)ethoxy]ethanes III and IV
IR spectrum,
1
Comp.
no.
, cm
1H NMR spectrum, , ppm (J, Hz)
CH=CH2
C=O
1716 7.34 7.26 m (5H, Ph), 6.33 d.d (cis-H, =CH , J 11), 6.16 d.d (1H, =CH, JHH 10), 5.93 d.d
I
1636
1636
1644
1640
HH
2
(
trans-H, =CH , J 14), 4.88 d.d (1H, CH, JHH 7), 4.12 t (4H, 2OCH ), 3.36 d.d (J 8),
2 HH 2 HH
3
.12 d.d (2H, CH Ph, J
8), 1.68 1.48 m (4H, CH CH )
HH 2 2
2
II
1724 7.26 7.06 m (4H, C6H4), 6.35 d.d (cis-H, =CH , J
11), 6.18 d.d (1H, =CH, JHH 10),
2
HH
5
.97 d.d (trans-H, =CH , J 14), 4.92 d.d (1H, CH, JHH 7), 4.10 t (4H, 2OCH ), 3.33 d.d
2 HH 2
(
JHH 8), 3.13 d.d (2H, CH C H , J 8), 2.31 s (3H, CH C H ), 1.69 1.46 m (4H, CH CH )
2 6 4 HH 3 6 4 2 2
III
IV
1720 7.30 7.20 m (5H, Ph), 6.30 d.d (cis-H, =CH , J 10), 6.14 d.d (1H, =CH, JHH 10), 5.93 d.d
2 HH
(
trans-H, =CH , J
15), 4.92 4.86 m (1H, CH), 4.20 t (4H, 2OCH ), 3.48 d.d (4H,
HH 2
2
CH OCH , J
2), 3.33 d.d (JHH 7), 3.10 d.d (2H, CH Ph, J
7)
2
2
HH
2
HH
1720 7.24 7.08 m (4H, C H ), 6.32 d.d (cis-H, =CH , J 10), 6.16 d.d (1H, =CH, JHH 10),
6
4
2
HH
5
.92 d.d (trans-H, CH2, JHH 15), 4.94 4.87 m (1H, CH), 4.23 t (4H, 2OCH ), 3.46 d.d (4H,
2
CH OCH , J 2), 3.33 d.d (JHH 7), 3.12 d.d (2H, CH C H , J 7), 2.31 s (3H, CH C H )
2
2
HH
2
6
4
HH
3 6 4
1
constants, elemental analyses, and H NMR and IR
spectra are given in Tables 1 and 2. The samples of
compounds I IV, synthesized by schemes 1 and 2,
are identical to each other.
Thus, the use as chloroarylating agents of arenedi-
azonium chlorides does not alter the regioselectivity
of the anionoarylation of glycol diacrylates, and the
reaction does not go further monoadduct formation.
The lower yields of arylalkyl chlorides compared with
those of monothiocyanatoarylation products [1] are
explained by a considerable difference in nucleo-
philicity between chloride and thiocyanate anions. In
this connection we considered it important to react the
monoadducts obtained with arenediazonium tetrafluo-
roborates in the presence of the thiocyanato group.
1
The structure of adducts I IV is proved by their H
and IR spectra. The IR spectra contain carbonyl ab-
sorption bands (1716 1724 cm ), as well as bands
due to stretching (1636 1644 cm ) and deformation
vibrations (808 812 and 980 984 cm ) of the multi-
ple bond of the free acrylic fragment. The H NMR
spectra contain aromatic proton signals at 7.34
1
1
1
1
7
.06 ppm (multiplet). The methylene proton signals
Monoadducts I IV react with arenediazonium tetra-
fluoroborates in the presence of potassium thiocyanate
to form diadducts: 1-(2-chloro-3-arylpropionyloxy)-
of the terminal vinyl group form a doublet of doublets
at 6.35 6.30 (cis-H) and 5.97 5.92 ppm (trans-H)
with coupling constants of 10 and 15 Hz, and the
methane protons of the same group appear as a
doublet of doublets at 6.18 6.14 ppm (coupling
constant 10 Hz). The asymmetrical proton of the CH
group attached to chlorine resonates at 4.94 4.86 ppm
4-(2-thiocyanato-3-arylpropionyloxy)butanes V and
VI and 1-(2-chloro-3-arylpropionyloxy)-2-[2-(2-thio-
cyanato-3-arylpropionyloxy)ethoxy]ethanes VII
and VIII.
(
multiplet).
The reaction was accomplished in aqueous acetone
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 75 No. 4 2005