Pd Nanoparticles Captured in Microporous Polymers
A R T I C L E S
1
6
it is favorable to attain the long-term stability of Pd entrapment.
For example, Bradley et al. demonstrated that extensive cross-
linking of a commercial solid-phase synthesis resin (PS-PEG) was
compatible with precious-metal reduction. According to some
precedents, radicals at growing polymer chains are responsible
for the metal reductions. For example, when bulk polymerization
of methyl methacrylate or acrylonitrile was carried out in the
11a
an effective way for PdNP capture to suppress the Pd leaching.
presence of metal salts such as Pd2 and Ag , the corresponding
+
+
Highly durable catalysts were also obtained by the postcapturing
procedure for PdNPs on spherical silica particles, as shown by Lee’s
metal nanoparticles were obtained in polymer solid despite the
11c
17
group. These preceding works are interesting, but it should be
also pointed out that they are somewhat tedious, due to the stepwise
nature for construction of the capture frameworks. In this article,
we wish to propose a new capture strategy for PdNPs entrapped
in microporous network polymers. An interesting feature of this
method is that the PdNP formation concurrently occurs with
synthesis of polymer matrices. Consequently, this approach pro-
vides a one-pot convenient procedure to prepare captured PdNP
systems, which work as high-performance and durable heteroge-
neous catalysts.
absence of any specific reducing reagents. Moreover, it is of
interest that the radicals of growing polymers seem to be capable
of producing highly crystalline metal nanoparticles. This is
important because the crystallinity of metal nanoparticles is a
1
7c
18
crucial factor for determining its catalytic ability. We therefore
hypothesized that, if this reduction system is applied to the PIPS
setup of cross-linkable monomer/porogenic solvent mixtures,
crystalline PdNPs captured in microporous network polymers
would be produced in a convenient one-pot procedure.
In order to verify the hypothesis, a PIPS system of ethylene
glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) and dimethylformamide (DMF)/
diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (diglyme) mixed solvent was
arranged in the presence of Pd acetate (Pd(OAc)
initiator, 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN). Poly(amidoamine)
PAMAM) dendrimers were selected as a ligand for both Pd
complexation and stabilization of the created PdNPs. PAMAM
and the related dendrimers are widely used for producing size-
tuned metal nanoparticles. Unlike the bulk polymerization cases
mentioned above, the addition of ligands should be crucial for the
present phase-separation system to make the Pd source more
distributed to the polymer phase rather than the solvent phase.
Microporous network polymers are highly designable solid
1
2
supports and have attracted increasing interest. The poly-
merization-induced phase separation (PIPS) technique is a
traditional method for preparing microporous network poly-
2
) and a radical
1
3
2+
(
mers. PIPS is typically carried out by polymerization of a
homogeneous mixture consisting of monomers and solvents,
where the solvents are miscible with the monomers but
immiscible with the generating polymers, so that a phase-
separated state can be obtained in the course of the polymeri-
zation. Subsequent removal of the solvents leaves pores inside
the network polymers, and the microporous structure thus
obtained usually shows a very high surface area. On the basis
of such interesting features, the microporous polymers prepared
by the PIPS method have been extensively utilized in a variety
of application fields. The molecular imprinting technique is a
unique example of microporous polymer usage, aiming toward
applications in molecular recognition, enzyme-mimic catalytic
19
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of Composite Microporous Polymers. The outline
of this study is depicted in Figure 1. A dendritic monomer
(G3-m) was initially synthesized by the equimolar reaction
between the terminal primary amines of generation-three PAMAM
dendrimer and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl isocyanate. G3-m contains
30 tertiary amines in the internal region and 32 peripheral
methacrylate functions tethered by urea linkages. After premixing
with Pd(OAc) in DMF, G3-m was copolymerized with large
excess of EGDMA (9-fold in weight ratio) in a PIPS setup at 70
°C to produce microporous network polymers. In the polymeri-
zation mixtures, excess Pd2 ions were introduced against the
tertiary amine of G3-m (Pd/N ratio 4/3), since the urea linkages
1
4
studies, and medicine. Interestingly, this technique strongly
depends on the rigid frameworks of the microporous polymers,
which result from the highly cross-linked polymer network
structure produced by the PIPS process. Moreover, recently
Kanamori et al. clearly proved the designable nature of PIPS.
According to their strategy, microporous network polymers with
well-defined bicontinuous morphologies were obtained in as-
sociation with living radical polymerization concepts through
2
+
1
2e,15
2+
11c,20
the characteristic spinodal decomposition.
are also expected to function as ligands for Pd capture.
The
On the basis of the aforementioned intriguing structural
features, we envisaged that the microporous polymers are
powerful tools for the capture of PdNPs as matrices. We also
focused on the fact that a radical polymerization process is
resulting polymer solids were sized to 75-300 µm and used for
6a,21
subsequent structural analysis and catalytic studies.
Several different amounts of AIBN were added to the
polymerization mixtures; the molar ratios to Pd(OAc) were
.046 (G3-p1), 0.092 (G3-p2), 0.18 (G3-p3), 0.55 (G3-p4), and
.1 (G3-p5), respectively. From a viewpoint of AIBN/vinyl unit
2
0
1
(
12) For example: (a) Chen, L.; Phillip, W. A.; Cussler, E. L.; Hillmyer,
M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13786. (b) O’Connor, N. A.;
Paisner, D. A.; Huryn, D.; Shea, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
(16) (a) Nakao, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 826. (b) Nakao,
Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 171, 386.
1
680. (c) Bhaskarapillai, A.; Sevilimedu, N. V.; Sellergren, B. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 3730. (d) Takeda, K.; Kuwahara, A.;
Ohmori, K.; Takeuchi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8833. (e)
Kanamori, K.; Hasegawa, J.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T. Macromol-
ecules 2008, 41, 7186.
(17) (a) Yanagihara, N.; Uchida, K.; Wakabayashi, M.; Hara, T. Mater.
Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1998, 501, 227. (b) Yanagihara, N.; Uchida,
K.; Wakabayashi, M.; Uetake, Y.; Hara, T. Langmuir 1999, 15, 3038.
(c) Zhang, Z.; Han, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 641. (d) Aymonier,
C.; Bortzmeyer, D.; Thomann, R.; M u¨ lhaupt, R. Chem. Mater. 2003,
15, 4874.
(
(
13) (a) Inoue, T. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1995, 20, 119. (b) Kiefer, J.; Hedrick,
J. L.; Hilborn, J. G. AdV. Polym. Sci. 1999, 147, 161.
14) (a) Wulff, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1812. (b)
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Man Made Mimics of Antibodies
and their Applications in Analytical Chemistry; Sellergren, B., Ed.;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001. (c) Alexander, C.; Davidson, L.; Hayes,
W. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2025.
(18) (a) Gentle, T. M.; Muetterties, E. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 2469.
(b) Rucker, T. G.; Logan, M. A.; Gentle, T. M.; Muetterties, E. L.;
Somorjai, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2703.
(19) For reviews, see: (a) Scott, R. W. J.; Wilson, O. M.; Crooks, R. M. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 692. (b) Astruc, D.; Ornelas, C.; Ruiz, J.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 841. (c) Andr e´ s, R.; de Jes u´ s, E.; Flores,
J. C. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 1161.
(
15) (a) Kanamori, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18,
2
407. (b) Hasegawa, J.; Kanamori, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T.;
Yamago, S. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1270. (c) Hasegawa, J.;
Kanamori, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Hanada, T.; Yamago, S. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 986.
(20) (a) Ramarao, C.; Ley, S. V.; Smith, S. C.; Shirley, I. M.; DeAlmeida,
N. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1132. (b) Ley, S. V.; Mitchell, C.; Pears,
D.; Ramarao, C.; Yu, J.-Q.; Zhou, W. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4665.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 13, 2010 4609