C. de la Calle Arregui et al. / Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 195 (2016) 58–62
59
H+
H O
2
HO
2
OMe
1
Scheme 1. Acid-catalyzed reaction of i-cholesteryl methyl ether (1) with water to
form cholesterol (2).
use of such a catalyst is unavoidable, minimize the amount of
catalyst required. In this communication, we investigate the ability
of different acids to catalyse the reaction, and establish conditions
that use minimal amounts of water and catalyst.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Choice of acid catalyst
Initial studies were conducted using 1 and non-enriched water
in 1,4-dioxane using a selection of acid catalysts (Table 1). This
solvent was chosen because of its miscibility with water and its
good solvation properties for cholesterol. In addition, as an aprotic
solvent it was not expected to participate in the reaction. All acid
catalysts were investigated at a ratio of 5 mol% with respect to 1.
Fig. 1. Byproducts from hydrolysis reactions of 1 in 1,4-dioxane.
temperature and the ratios of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid
catalyst and water to ether 1. These outcomes of these experiments
are summarised in Table 2 and Fig. 2. The best yield of cholesterol
was found with 0.05 equivalents of acid and 5 equivalents of water
at 20 C (entry 8). Increasing the number of equivalents of water
beyond 5 did not lead to significant benefits, either in overall yield
The acids investigated covered a range of pK
a
values in organic
solvents, including the superacids trifluoromethanesulfonic acid
ꢁ
(
(
pK
pK
a
= À11.4 in dichloroethane) and tetrafluoroboric acid
= À10.3 in dichloroethane) (Kütt et al., 2011). From the data
a
(
entry 11) or in the ratio of cholesterol to other products (entry 9).
it is apparent that trifluoromethanesulfonic acid produced by some
margin the greatest yield of cholesterol, at the expense of having
exchangeable oxygen. Tetrafluoroboric acid, on the other hand,
gave a poor yield of cholesterol but, being a hydracid, did offer the
potential for preparing cholesterol with an isotopic enrichment
matching that of the water used for its preparation. It should be
noted though, that in the reaction utilizing this acid, a significant
quantity of 1 remained unreacted after 5 h, raising the possibility
that a longer reaction time would increase the yield of cholesterol.
In all cases, unreacted 1 was present, alongside a number of
byproducts, the structures of which are given in Fig. 1.
Although in the latter case the reaction had not gone to completion
within 5 h, the major product after this time was alcohol 5 (full
details are in the ESI). Increasing the number of equivalents of acid
catalyst led to a significant increase in the formation of byproducts,
particularly methyl ether 4, which formed >20% of the products
when 1 equivalent of acid was used. Decreasing the amount of acid
ꢁ
below 0.05 equivalents gave incomplete reactions after 5 h at 20 C,
but in all cases cholesterol was not the major product after this
time and would not have given cholesterol yields greater than
entry 8 had they been allowed to go to completion.
When the mole fraction of cholesterol in the products is
analysed in relation to the ratio of acid to water (Fig. 2) in the
reaction, the conditions corresponding to entries 7 and 8 in Table 2,
with an acid/water ratio of 0.01, are found to be optimal for
increasing the proportion of cholesterol in the mixture. At lower
acid to water ratios, the predominant byproduct is the alcohol 3
resulting from hydrolysis of ether 1. At higher ratios, the major
byproduct becomes methyl ether 4.
Some of these byproducts, including dicholesteryl ether 3 and
cholesteryl methyl ether 4 could be accounted for by reaction of 1
with other nucleophiles formed during the progress of the
reaction. Alcohol 5 was formed by a competing nucleophilic
displacement of methanol from 1. The other products, 6 and 7,
could be accounted for by elimination reactions of either
cholesterol, 3 or 4 (for 6) and 1 or 5 (for 7).
On the basis of the optimal conditions, and assuming complete
2
.2. Optimization of reaction conditions
16
exchange between the
O isotope of the catalyst and the
18
O
isotope of the enriched water, the maximum isotopic
On the basis of this preliminary work, further experiments were
enrichment of cholesterol theoretically attainable (not allowing
conducted to investigate the effects on cholesterol yield of
Table 1
a
The influence of acid catalyst on the formation of cholesterol from 1 in the presence of water.
Acid
CF SO
p-TsOH
CH SO
Yield cholesterol (%)b
Byproductsc
3
3
H
73 (61)
trace
1
18 (16)
7 (6)
3 (9%), 4 (9%), 5 (trace), 6 (trace), other (9%) + 1 (trace)
3,4, 5 (all trace) + 1 (>99%)
3 (trace), 4 (2%), 5 (2%), 7 (1%), other (1%) + 1 (93%)
3 (1%), 4 (3%), 5 (12%), 6 (1%), 7 (trace), other (10%) + 1 (55%)
3 (1%), 4 (2%), 5 (9%), 6 (trace), 7 (1%), other (1%) + 1 (79%)
3
3
H
HBF
HCl
4
a
ꢁ
Conditions in all cases: 5 eq. water, 0.05 eq. acid, 1,4-dioxane, 80 C, 5 h.
b
c
Yields are calculated from analysis of crude NMR spectra. Figures in parentheses indicate isolated yields.
Yields are calculated from analysis of crude NMR spectra. Trace products were detectable by thin layer chromatography but not 1H NMR. The relative yields of ‘other’
products were determined on the basis of 3-H signals or pairs of olefinic signals that could not be attributed to any of 1–7.