K.-W. Lei et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 66 (2007) 662–666
663
residue was washed by column chromatography (silica gel,
2:1 CHCl3/CH3CO2Et) and evaporated in vacuum resulted a
yellow oil (4.3 g). Yield: 50%. La, 1H NMR spectrum (300 M,
CDCl3): δ = 7.13–7.38 (m, 20H); 3.73(s, 8H; 4O–CH2–C(O));
3.22(s, 12H; 4N–CH3); 3.21(s, 8H; 4C–CH2–O); 2.98(s,
4H; 2C–CH2–O); 1.23 (q, 4H; 2R–CH2–C); 0.70(t, 6H;
2CH3–R–C). IR: ν 1674s (C O), 1112s (Ar–O–C). Formula
weight of La: 839.45. Analytical data, C 68.67(Calc. 68.71); H
7.39(7.45); N 6.56(6.68) %.
1
Lb, H NMR spectrum (300 M, CDCl3): δ = 7.06–7.36 (m,
20H); 3.66(s, 8H; 4O–CH2–C(O)); 3.65(q, 8H; 4N–CH2–R);
3.17(s, 8H; 4C–CH2–O); 3.02(s, 4H; 2C–CH2–O); 1.21
(q, 4H; 2R–CH2–C); 1.04(t, 12H; 4CH3–R–N); 0.70(t, 6H;
2CH3–R–C). IR: ν 1674s (C O), 1122s (Ar–O–C). Formula
weight of Lb: 895.13. Analytical data, C 69.77(Calc. 69.53); H
7.88(7.97); N 6.26(6.42) %.
1
Lc, H NMR spectrum (300 M, CDCl3): δ = 6.92–7.26(m,
40H); 4.84(s, 8H; 4N–CH2–R); 3.75(s, 8H; 4O–CH2–C(O));
3.23(s, 8H; 4C–CH2–O); 3.11(s, 4H; 2C–CH2–O); 1.27 (q, 4H;
2R–CH2–C);0.76(t, 6H;2CH3–R–C). IR:ν 1675s(C O), 1108s
(Ar–O–C). Formula weight of Lc: 1142.58. Analytical data, C
75.77(Calc. 75.63); H 7.02(6.88); N 5.06(4.90) %.
Scheme 1. The ligands.
2.4. Synthesis of complexes
2. Experimental
An ethyl acetate solution of Ln(NO3)3·6H2O [Ln = Eu(III),
Tb(III), 0.2 mmol], Ln(ClO4)3·6H2O [Ln = Eu(III), Tb(III),
0.1 mmol], was added dropwise to a solution of the ligand L
(0.1 mmol) in the ethyl acetate (30 ml). The mixture was stirred
for 4 h and white precipitate formed. The precipitate was col-
lected and washed three times with ethyl acetate. Further drying
in vacuum afforded pale white powder, yield: 75–80%.
2.1. Materials
All commercially available chemicals were of A.R. grade and
all solvents used were purified by standard methods.
2.2. Methods
The metal ions were determined by EDTA titration using
xylenal orange as indicator. C, H and N were determined
using an Elementar Vario EL. Conductivity measurements were
carried out with a DDS-307 type conductivity bridge using
10−3 mol dm−3 solutions in acetone at 25 ◦C. IR spectra were
recorded on Nicolet FT-170SX instrument using KBr discs in
3. Result and discussion
3.1. Properties of the complexes
Analytical data for the complexes listed in Table 1
conform to an 2:6:1 metal-to-nitrate-to-L stoichiometry
ichiometry [LnL]·(ClO4)3. All complexes are soluble in DMF,
ingly soluble in water and ethyl acetate. The molar conductances
of the complexes in MeOH (see Table 1) indicate that all nitrate
complexes act as 1:2 electrolytes, and all perchlorate complexes
act as 1:3 electrolytes [13].
1
the 400–4000 cm−1 region, H NMR spectra were measured
on a Varian Mercury plus 300 M spectrometer in CDCl3 solu-
tion with TMS as internal standard. Fluorescence measurements
were made on a Hitachi F-4500 spectrophotometer equipped
with quartz curettes of 1 cm path length at room temperature.
The excitation and emission slit widths were 2.5 nm.
2.3. Synthesis of the ligand
3.2. IR spectra
A
solution of 3,3,7,7-tetrahydroxymethyl-5-oxanonane
(2.5 g, 10 mmol) in THF was added dropwise into a THF solu-
tion that was suspended with NaH (1.6 g, 60%, 40 mmol), and
the mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature until
no gas appeared. Then a solution of N-ethyl-N-phenylchlo-
roacetamide (8.7 g, 44 mmol) (N-methyl-N-phenylchloro-
acetamide for La, N-benzyl-N-phenylchloroacetamide for
Lc) in THF was added dropwise into the mixture. After the
mixture was refluxed for 6 h, the THF was evaporated and the
The main infrared bands of the ligand and its complexes are
presented in Table 2. The IR spectrum of free ligand shows bands
at 1674–1675 and 1122–1108 cm−1, which may be assigned to
ν (C O) and ν (C–O–C), respectively. In the IR spectra of all
the lanthanide complexes, these bands shift by about 50 and
25 cm−1 toward lower wavenumbers, thus indicating that the
carbonyl and ethereal oxygen atoms take part in coordination to
the metal ion.