DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2015.1043296
Synthesis and evaluation of some new N-aroyl-a,b-unsaturated piperidones
7
this structure, the 4-nitrophenylsulfonyl group is almost parallel to activities. It can be seen from Table 1 and Figure 6(A)–(C) that
the C14–C10–C11–C12–C13 plane and the two aryl groups in compounds 2a–2e, with stronger fluorescence intensity, demon-
3,5-bis(benzylidene)-4-piperidones. The corresponding dihedral strated lower cytotoxic activities, while compounds 1a–1e and
angles are ca. 25.9(2)ꢁ, ca. 6.52(2)ꢁ and ca. 9.35(2)ꢁ. In addition, 3a–3e, with weaker fluorescent intensity, demonstrated higher
the N1–S1–C24 angle is only 108.0(2)ꢁ, which demonstrates that cytotoxic activities. Further investigation into the structure–
the olefinic double bonds are close to the 4-nitrophenylsulfonyl cytotoxicity–fluorescence relationships of the compounds is
group. The corresponding C12ꢃ ꢃ ꢃC24, C15ꢃ ꢃ ꢃC29, C10ꢃ ꢃ ꢃC24 warranted.
and C9ꢃ ꢃ ꢃC25 distances are 3.372(2), 3.612(2), 3.541(3) and
˚
3.777(3) A. Such short distances may result in inter-conjugated-
Conclusions
system interactions between the 4-nitrophenylsulfonyl groups and
3,5-bis(benzylidene)-4-piperidones, further influencing the fluor-
escent properties of the molecules.
In summary, we synthesized 15 new a,b-unsaturated piperidones
(N-aroyl-3,5-bis(benzylidene)-4-piperidones), 1a–1e (series 1),
2a–2e (series 2) and 3a–3e (series 3), and investigated their
cytotoxic and fluorescent properties. In addition, we assessed the
antitumor activity in vivo of compound 1b (having better potency)
using a nude mouse PG-BE1 xenograft model. Among the
derivatives assayed, the majority of compounds 1a–1e (possessing
strong electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl groups in the aryl
rings of A and B) and 3a–3e (possessing both electron-
withdrawing bromine and electron-donating methoxy groups in
aryl rings A and B) displayed significant cytotoxic properties, but
their fluorescent activities were a little weaker. Alternatively,
molecules 2a–2e (bearing strong electron-donating dimethyla-
mino groups in the aryl rings A and B) illustrated poor cytotoxic
properties, but their fluorescent activities were stronger than those
of compounds 1a–1e and 3a–3e. Nevertheless, all the compounds
that were investigated had interesting fluorescent properties
overall. Compounds 1b, 3a, 3d and 3e displayed remarkable
cytotoxic activities towards five human carcinoma cell lines.
Importantly, the results of a PG-BE1 xenograft model showed that
compound 1b possessed marked inhibitory effects on tumor
growth and had no obvious toxicity toward the nude mice.
Compounds 1b, 3a, 3d and 3e represent possible lead molecules
for synthesizing new derivatives with the aim to increase their
cytotoxic potencies, while producing low-toxicity antitumor drug
candidates that undergo fluorescence.
Antitumor activity in vivo
The antitumor activity in vivo is the most important factor to
evaluate for new antitumor agents. The sensitive PG-BE1
xenograft model was used to investigate the antitumor activity
in vivo of compound 1b, which had higher potency. The diameters
of tumors were measured two times per week after treatment of
1b in athymic nude mice with PG-BE1 xenografts (Figure 5A).
With doses of 60, 30 and 15 mg/kg, the corresponding tumor
inhibitory rates were 58.8%, 38.3% and 31.0%, respectively,
which demonstrated that compound 1b could inhibit the growth of
the tumor. Moreover, toxicity is one of the metrics to judge
antitumor agents, and the body weight changes of nude mice post-
therapy can be influenced by the toxicity of the drugs indirectly.
From Figure 5(B), it was shown that the body weight of mice did
not decreased obviously compared with the control group,
indicating that compound 1b has no apparent toxicity to nude
mice bearing PG-BE1 xenografts.
Fluorescent properties
Lengthening the conjugated spacer by inserting additional
substituted groups into 3,5-bis(arylidene)-4-piperidone may
result in increasing the electron-transporting effects and fluores-
cent properties of the molecules23,24. Taking this into account, the
N-aroyl-3,5-bis(arylidene)-4-piperidone derivatives, discussed
above, were designed and synthesized. Their fluorescent proper-
ties were then explored (Figure 6A–C).
Declaration of interest
Financial support of this work was from National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 21402010), the Foundation of Shandong
Province (Nos. ZR2014BL008, ZR2010HL065). The authors report no
declarations of interest.
The compounds were excited at 435 nm for series 1, 365 nm for
series 2 and 373 nm for series 3 to obtain the fluorescence spectra.
The solutions (10ꢀ4 mol Lꢀ1) were prepared in a mixture of
ethanol and dimethyl sulfoxide (Vethanol–Vdimethyl sulfoxide ¼ 4:1).
The fluorescence emission was measured at room temperature
from 460 to 650 nm for series 1, 480–700 nm for series 2 and 390–
590 nm for series 3. Figure 6(A)–(C) displays contrasts in the
emission spectra from series 1 to series 3, respectively.
Compounds of series 1 exhibit an emission maximum at
approximately 521 nm, compounds of series 2 at approximately
572 nm and compounds of series 3 at approximately 424 nm.
The results of Figure 6(A)–(C) revealed that compounds 2a–
2e, with strong electron-donating dimethylamino groups, pos-
sessed the strongest fluorescence. The fluorescence intensities of
compounds 1a–1e and 3a–3e were weaker due to the influence of
the heavy atom effect from bromine and the electron-withdrawing
effects of trifluoromethyl groups, respectively. In addition, the
emission intensity of the parent NH-3,5-bis(benzylidene)-4-piper-
idones (1a, 2a, 3a) is stronger than that of N-(4-nitrobenzoyl)
derivatives (1b, 2b, 3b) and N-(4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl)
derivatives (1e, 2e, 3e), but weaker than that of N-(4-acetamino-
benzenesulfonyl) derivatives (1d, 2d, 3d) and N-(4-methylbenze-
nesulfonyl) derivatives (1c, 2c, 3c).
References
1. Shintani R, Tokunaga N, Doi H, et al. A new entry of nucleophiles in
rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric 1,4-addition reactions: addition of
organozinc reagents for the synthesis of 2-aryl-4-piperidones. J Am
Chem Soc 2004;126:6240–1.
2. Weintraub PM, Sabol JS, Kane JM, Borcherding DR. Recent
advances in the synthesis of piperidones and piperidines.
Tetrahedron 2003;59:2953–89.
3. Dimmock JR, Ealias DW, Beazely MA, et al. Bioactivities of
chalcones. Curr Med Chem 1999;6:1125–49.
4. Feenstra RW, Long SK, vander Heijden JAM, et al. Use of
compounds having combined dopamine D-5HT1A and a-adrenor-
eceptor agonist action for treating central nervous system disorders.
US Patent 2003/0186838 A1; 2003.
5. Comins DL, Brooks CA, Ingalls CL. Reduction of N-acyl-2-3-
dihydro-4-pyridones to N-acyl-4-piperidones using zinc and acetic
acid. J Org Chem 2001;66:2181–2.
6. Baldwin PR, Reeves AZ, Powell KR, et al. Monocarbonyl analogs of
curcumin inhibit growth of antibiotic sensitive and resistant strains
of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Med Chem 2015;92:693–9.
7. Bazzaro M, Anchoori RK, Mudiam MKR, et al. a,b-Unsaturated
carbonyl system of chalcone-based derivatives is responsible for
broad inhibition of proteasomal activity and preferential killing of
human papilloma virus (HPV) positive cervical cancer cells. J Med
Chem 2011;54:449–56.
At the same time, the results indicated that the fluorescent
properties of these compounds were correlated with their cytotoxic