C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
multiple redox cycling events (Figure 2f). Taken together, the data
show that RF1 can be loaded into living cells and report multiple
oxidation-reduction cycles by a reversible fluorescence response.
The turn-on dynamic range for RF1 oxidation in cells is less than
that in the spectroscopic experiments, presumably due to the
reducing environment of the cell.
In summary, we have presented the synthesis, characterization,
and live-cell imaging applications of RF1, a new redox-sensitive
optical sensor for monitoring reversible oxidation and reduction
events in living systems. RF1 features a reversible change in
fluorescence upon oxidation or reduction, a dual colorimetric/
fluorimetric response, and visible wavelength excitation and emis-
sion profiles. Moreover, the sensor is capable of visualizing multiple
cycles of oxidative stress and reductive repair in living cells.
Experiments are underway to utilize RF1 and related chemical tools
to study the production, propagation, and termination of oxidative
signals in biological systems.
Figure 2. Live-cell imaging of oxidative stress/repair by confocal
microscopy at 37 °C. (a) HEK cells loaded with 5 µM RF1-AM for 30
min. (b) RF1-loaded HEK cells treated with 100 µM H2O2 for 9 min. (c)
RF1-loaded, H2O2-treated cells in panel b after an additional 6 min. (d)
Cells exposed to a second dose of H2O2 (100 µM) for an additional 9 min.
(e) Cells in panel d after an additional 6 min. (f) Brightfield image of live
HEK cells in panels a-e, confirming their viability throughout the
experiment. Scale bar ) 10 µm.
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of California,
Berkeley, the Dreyfus Foundation, the Beckman Foundation, the
Packard Foundation, the American Federation for Aging Research,
the National Science Foundation (CAREER Award CHE-0548245),
and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH GM
79465) for research support. E.W.M. was supported by a Chemical
Biology Interface Training Grant from the NIH (T32 GM066698)
and a Stauffer fellowship, and S.X.B. was funded by a summer
undergraduate research fellowship from the UC Berkeley Chemical
Biology program. Confocal fluorescence images were acquired at
the Molecular Imaging Center at UC Berkeley. We thank Ann
Fischer at the UC Berkeley Tissue Culture Facility for expert
technical assistance.
reduction cycles mediated by H2O2 and TCEP. Reduction of RF1
by 5 equiv of TCEP occurs promptly upon mixing, whereas
oxidation proceeds more slowly. The observed rate constant for
RF1 reoxidation by H2O2 under pseudo-first-order conditions is kobs
) 4.0(1.1) × 10-2 s-1. The dual colorimetric/fluorimetric response
of RF1 suggests that a simple photoinduced electron-transfer
mechanism is not operable in this redox cycle. Instead, we propose
that reduction of RF1 generates a dihydrofluorescein species from
the disulfide through reduction, internal charge transfer, and
protonation. Along these lines, the 1H NMR of reduced RF1 shows
a new peak at 5.16 ppm, consistent with a methine-type proton on
the quaternary center of a dihydrofluorescein structure. The
reversible response of small-molecule RF1 is complementary to
fiber-optic probes for oxygen and other redox-active analytes.17
With spectroscopic results showing the redox sensitivity and
reversibility of RF1 in hand, we next tested the ability of this new
chemical tool to image reversible redox cycles in living cells. As
initial experiments revealed that RF1 is not membrane permeable,
we prepared the acetoxymethyl (AM) ester derivative for live-cell
labeling. Live HEK 293 cells loaded with 5 µM RF1-AM for 30
min at 37 °C show faint fluorescence, consistent with entry of the
probe into the cells and reduction by the cytosolic environment
(Figure 2a). Washing and treatment of the same RF1-loaded cells
with H2O2 results in a marked increase in intracellular fluorescence
within 5-10 min as the probe senses oxidative stress (Figure 2b).
After 5-10 more min, the observed intracellular fluorescence
decreases to baseline levels as the native reducing environment of
the cells is restored (Figure 2c). Control images on other fields of
cells in the same experiment show that the lack of fluorescence is
not due to RF1 loss or photobleaching. To further demonstrate that
low levels of intracellular fluorescence in panel c of Figure 2 are
not due to photobleaching or loss of dye, addition of a second
aliquot of H2O2 oxidant results in another burst of oxidative stress
and increase in intracellular fluorescence (Figure 2d), which
subsides again after an additional 5-10 min due to restoration of
the reducing cellular environment (Figure 2e). Finally, brightfield
transmission images confirm that the cells are still viable after these
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic and experimental
details (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Finkel, T. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 15, 247-254.
(2) Lu, T.; Pan, Y.; Kao, S.-Y.; Li, C.; Kohane, I.; Chan, J.; Yankner, B. A.
Nature 2004, 429, 883-891.
(3) Balaban, R. S.; Nemoto, S.; Finkel, T. Cell 2005, 120, 483-495.
(4) Rhee, S. G. Science 2006, 312, 1882-1883 and references therein.
(5) Stone, J. R.; Yang, S. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2006, 8, 243-270.
(6) Lee, J.-W.; Helmann, J. D. Nature 2006, 440, 363-367.
(7) Tonks, N. K. Cell 2005, 121, 667-670.
(8) Stadtman, E. R.; Van Remmen, H.; Richardson, A.; Wehr, N. B.; Levine,
R. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 135-140.
(9) Hempel, S. L.; Buettner, G. R.; O’Malley, Y. Q.; Wessels, D. A.; Flaherty,
D. M. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 146-159.
(10) Negre-Salvayre, A.; Auge´, N.; Duval, C.; Robbesyn, F.; Thiers, J.-C.;
Nazzal, D.; Benoist, H.; Salvayre, R. Methods Enzymol. 2002, 352, 62-
71.
(11) Haugland, R. P. The Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and
Labeling Technologies, 10th ed.; Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, 2005.
(12) Østergaard, H.; Henriksen, A.; Hansen, F. G.; Winther, J. R. EMBO J.
2001, 20, 5853-5862.
(13) Hanson, G. T.; Aggeler, R.; Oglesbee, D.; Cannon, M.; Capaldi, R. A.
Tsien, R. Y.; Remington, S. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13044-13053.
(14) Lee, K.; Dzubeck, V.; Latshaw, L.; Schneider, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 13616-13617.
(15) Cline, D. J.; Thorpe, C.; Schneider, J. P. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 325, 144-
150.
(16) Ashe, A. J., III; Kampf, J. W.; Savla, P. M. Heteroat. Chem. 1994, 5,
113-119.
(17) Wolfbeis, O. S. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3859-3874.
JA0668973
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 12, 2007 3459