Altering the Gap in Cyclobutene Reactions
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 4
There have been previous theoretical studies of the disrotatory
cyclobutene ring-opening. Breulet and Schaefer utilized a two-
configuration self-consistent field (TCSCF) ab initio calculation
to characterize conrotatory and disrotatory stationary points.14
They found that the conrotatory stationary point is a true
transition state, whereas the disrotatory stationary point has two
imaginary vibrational frequencies. This study was at the time
an improvement of initial MINDO/3 calculations by Dewar and
Kirschner who found a ground-state disrotatory transition state.15
Robb et al. presented a detailed excited-state potential energy
surface of butadiene using a multiconfigurational self-consistent
field (MCSCF) and proposed that a disrotatory process proceeds
through a conical intersection.16 Buenker et al. have attempted
to understand the role of ring torsion in the electrocyclic reaction
of cyclobutene to butadiene and have found that the rotational
phase of the process occurs over a narrow range of distance
between C3 and C4.17 Maier and Bothur also studied both
theoretically (B3LYP/6-311G(d)) and experimentally the thermal
and photochemical ring-openings of dichlorocyclobutenes.18
Only recently was the thermal disrotatory transition state for
cyclobutene ring-opening found by Sakai with CASSCF cal-
culations.7 The forbidden pathway has an activation energy 19.5
kcal/mol higher than that of the allowed conrotatory pathway,
according to MP2/CAS 6-311+G(d,p) calculations.7
The planarity effect on the allowed-forbidden gap was
originally investigated experimentally by Roth and Ho¨rstermann
in 1979.19 Houk and Kallel attempted theoretical studies of the
system in the late 1980’s, but they were unable to locate
disrotatory transition states.20 A collaborative manuscript be-
tween the Bochum and Los Angeles groups was begun at that
time. Interest in these reactions recently resurfaced due to
Sakai’s successful location of transition states for disrotatory
reactions of cyclobutenes and derivatives.7 We have now
combined modern computational work and the details of the
original experimental study of the effect of planarity on the
cyclobutene ring-opening transition states.
tions, a rapid equilibration to a ratio of 14:15 ) 5:1 occurred.
Further irradiation of the mixture gave three products which
were separated by gas chromatography and identified as the
expected cyclization products 7 and 8 and the diene 16 derived
from 14 via a 1,5-hydrogen shift (Scheme 4).
The NMR spectrum of cis-6,7-dimethylbicyclo[3.2.0]hept-
1(5)-ene (7) showed the doublet for the methyl groups at 1.0
ppm, whereas the corresponding signal of the trans-isomer 8 is
shifted to a lower field (1.15 ppm). For the tertiary protons of
the four-membered ring, the opposite effect is observed. The
cis-product showed a multiplet at 2.9 ppm for the allylic protons
separated from the other ring protons of the molecule. The
corresponding signal of the trans-isomer overlaps with the other
signals between 2.0 and 2.4 ppm. Similar effects have been
observed with other systems having vicinal substituents such
as 1,2-dimethylene-3,4-dimethylcyclobutane or 3,4-dimethyl-
cyclobutene.23 Furthermore, the stereochemistry can be properly
assigned from the configuration of the products of the pyrolysis
of 7 and 8, respectively. Because the mode of the thermal ring-
opening is clear (conrotatory), the main (allowed) product shows
whether the starting material was cis or trans. Product 14 is
derived from the cis-compound 7, and 15 is derived from the
trans-compound 8. The stereochemistry of 14 (Z,E) and 15 (E,E)
was assigned from the interpretation of their NMR spectra. The
NMR of the unsymmetrical (Z,E)-compound 14 is more complex
than the NMR of 15 (E,E).
1b. Thermal Ring-Opening of cis- and trans-6,7-Dimethyl-
bicyclo[3.2.0]hept-1(5)-ene (7 and 8). For the investigation of
the stereoselectivity of the ring-opening reaction, the isomeric
cyclobutenes 7 and 8 were thermolized in the gas phase. To
ensure the detection of the smallest amounts of the “forbidden”
products, the starting materials for the thermolysis were purified
by gas chromatography to an isomeric purity of >99.99%. The
ring-opening of 7 was investigated at three temperatures between
125 and 200 °C. Besides the expected 1,2-diethylidenecyclo-
pentanes 14 and 15, diene 16 could be detected in various
amounts depending on the reaction temperature. By thermolysis
of pure 14 and 15, it could be shown that only the Z,E-isomer
(14) undergoes the H-shift reaction, whereas the E,E-isomer (15)
was stable under the reaction conditions (Scheme 5). The results
of the thermolyses are listed in Table 1.
Results
Experimental. We summarize here the principal experimental
results. Full experimental details are given in the Supporting
Information.
1a. Synthesis of cis- and trans-6,7-Dimethylbicyclo[3.2.0]-
hept-1(5)-ene (7 and 8). The target molecules were synthesized
starting from ketone 13, which was prepared in two steps from
cyclopentanone according to Birkofer.21 The reaction of 2-eth-
ylidenecyclopentanone with the Wittig reagent prepared from
ethyltriphenylphosphonium bromide and n-butyllithium gave a
mixture of dienes 14 and 15 in a ratio of 1:7 in 15% yield. An
analytical sample of the mixture was separated by preparatory
gas chromatography, and the mixture of 14 and 15 was
photocyclized without separation.22 Under the reaction condi-
(14) Breulet, J.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1221-1226.
(15) Dewar, M. J. S.; Kirchner, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6809-6810.
(16) (a) Olivucci, M.; Bernardi, F.; Ragazos, I. N.; Robb, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 3710-3721. (b) Bernardi, F.; De, S.; Olivucci, M.; Robb,
M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1737-1744.
(17) Hsu, K.; Buenker, R. J.; Peyerimhoff, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
5639-5644.
(22) The light source was a mercury low-pressure lamp of the type 100 W,
made by Gra¨ntzel.
(18) Maier, G.; Bothur, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2063, 3-2072.
(19) Ho¨rstermann, P. Dissertation, Ruhr Universita¨t, Bochum, Germany, 1979.
(20) Kallel, E. A.; Houk, K. N., unpublished and now obsolete results.
(21) (a) Birkofer, L.; Barnikel, C. D. Chem. Ber. 1958, 91, 1996-1999. (b)
Birkofer, L.; Kim, S. M.; Engels, H. D. Chem. Ber. 1962, 95, 1495-1504.
(23) (a) Gajewski, J. J.; Shih, C. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 5900-5901.
(b) Gajewski, J. J.; Black, W. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 899-902. (c)
Winter, R. E. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965, 1207-1212. (d) Criegee, R.;
Seebach, D.; Winter, R. E.; Borretzen, B.; Brune, H.-A. Chem. Ber. 1965,
98, 2339-2352.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 19, 2003 5841