M. Harmata et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 5919–5922
5921
L. Barnes for acquisition of X-ray data. A.N. thanks the
Centro de Supercomputaci o´ n de Galicia (CESGA) for
computer time.
O
O
H
R1
H
R1
R2
R2
O
Supplementary data
1
1
5
6
32.4 ( 29.9
35.4 ( 33.9
)
)
17 Š1.9 ( Š8.3
18 Š4.8 ( Š8.0
)
)
O
O
R2
R1
1
1
3
4
0.0
0.0
H
H
References and notes
. (a) Beaudry, C. M.; Malerich, J. P.; Trauner, D. Chem.
R2
R1
R1
R2
1
Rev. 2005, 105, 4757; (b) Frontier, A. J.; Collison, C.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7577.
1
2
9 26.3 ( 18.8
0 27.8 ( 20.5
)
)
21 18.4 ( 11.9
22 16.8 ( 10.2
)
)
2
. Harmata, M.; Zheng, P.; Schreiner, P. R.; Navarro-
V a´ zquez, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1966.
1
1
3,15,17,19,21 ( R1 = H, R2 = Me)
4,16,18,20,22 ( R1 = Me, R2 = H )
3. Narayanan, B. A.; Bunnelle, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett.
987, 28, 6261.
4. Compound 8: 85% yield; pale yellow solid; mp: 92–93 °C;
1
Scheme 4. Activation and reaction B3LYP/6-311+G**//B3LYP/6-
1G* DG298.15 K free energies. Regular font: gas phase values, italics:
À1
1
3
IR (film): 2908.9, 1707.6, 1613.6, 1433.8, 1184.5 cm ; H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.56 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.37
td, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (td, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H),
PCM (TFE) data.
3
(
7
.14 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.19–6.27 (m, 2H), 2.93–
frequencies were computed on all optimized structures
to verify the nature of the stationary points and to ob-
tain thermochemical quantities. Reported free energies
2.95 (m, 2H), 2.71–2.73 (m, 2H), 1.87 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H);
13
C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl
3
): d 202.2, 174.0, 135.6, 134.4,
1
1
2
30.1, 129.7, 128.8, 127.6, 127.4, 126.8, 125.7, 34.2, 33.9,
+
9.5; HRMS Calcd for C14H13BrO M , 276.0144; found,
DG2
were obtained by inclusion of B3LYP/6-
98.15 K
*
76.0137. Compound 9: 16% yield (80% based on recov-
3
1G thermochemical corrections in the B3LYP/6-
ered starting material); solid, mp: 64–65 °C; IR: 3015.2,
*
*
17
3
11+G computations.
À1
1
1
7
7
715.8, 1613.6 cm ; H NMR 300 MHz, CDCl ): d 7.24–
3
.45 (m, 4H), 6.33 (d, J = 11.4, 1H), 5.83 (dt, J = 11.4,
.0 Hz, 1H), 2.93–2.96 (m, 2H), 2.67–2.70 (m, 2H), 1.75
(dd, J = 7.0, 1.7 Hz, 3H); C NMR (75.0 MHz, CDCl ): d
The computations (Scheme 4) help elucidate the some-
what unexpected finding that 9 is better behaved than
1
3
3
8
. This can be rationalized in terms of the relative
201.5, 173.3, 134.9, 134.6, 129.8, 129.0, 128.8, 127.5, 126.8,
energies of the zwitterionic intermediates 21 and 22.
Although the position of the methyl group over the p-
system in transition state 20 results in a slightly higher
activation free energy for the formation of zwitterion
126.7, 124.3, 33.2, 32.3, 14.4; HRMS Calcd for C14
M , 276.0144; found, 276.0137.
. The reactivity of cerium chloride is dependent on the
manner in which the cerium chloride is activated. See also:
H
13BrO
+
5
6
(
a) Conlon, D. A.; Kumke, D.; Moeder, C.; Hardiman,
M.; Hutson, G.; Sailer, L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346,
307; (b) Evans, W. J.; Feldman, J. D.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am.
2
2 as compared to 21, formation of the former is less
endothermic, which, as a consequence, results in a faster
overall process, making side reactions less competitive.
Alternatively, the electrocyclization might be reversible.
The computational data suggest reversibility should be
more important for the cyclization of 13 than 14. This
would result in the regeneration of 13, from zwitterion
1
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4581.
. Other methods were used for dehydrating CeCl Æ7H O: (a)
3 2
Takeda, N.; Imamoto, T. Org. Synth. 1999, 76, 228; (b)
Paquette, L. A. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic
Synthesis; Wiley: Chichester, 1995 pp 1031.
2
1, allowing it to engage in side reactions and thus
7. Typical electrocyclic reaction procedure: To a trifluoroeth-
anol (10.3 mL) solution of E-8 (28.7 mg, 0.103 mmol) was
added triethylamine (43 lL, 0.31 mmol). The resulting
mixture was heated under certain conditions (method A:
2
lowering the yield of 10. As previously observed, the
conrotatory process for 13 and 14 is kinetically and ther-
modynamically favored over the disrotatory cyclizations
involving transition states 15 and 16, respectively.
5
0 °C, 7 days; method B: 70 °C, 2 days). The reaction was
monitored by TLC. After the completion of the reaction,
trifluoroethanol was evaporated and the residue was
In conclusion, we uncovered new evidence for an
8
dissolved in CH
2 2
Cl and washed with 1 N HCl, saturated
p-electron conrotatory mechanism for the cyclization
NaHCO , H O and brine. The extract was dried over
3
2
reaction of cyclopentadienones. Further studies of the
mechanism of this process and applications to synthesis
are underway.
MgSO4 and the solvent was removed by a rotavap.
Column chromatography (15% EtOAc, 30% EtOAc) gave
the desired product.
. The E/Z ratio was derived from the respective alkenes by
proton NMR.
8
9
. Compound 10 (from 8): Method A: 43% yield (33%,
recovered starting material); method B: 39% yield (27%
recovered starting material). Colorless crystal, mp: 132–
133 °C; IR: m 2917.1, 1687.1, 1670.8, 1593.1, 1270.3,
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foun-
dation to whom we are grateful. Thanks to Dr. Charles
À1
1
1151.8, 1115.1 cm
;
3
H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl ): d