Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

356-32-1

Post Buying Request

356-32-1 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

356-32-1 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 356-32-1 includes 6 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 3 digits, 3,5 and 6 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 3 and 2 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 356-32:
(5*3)+(4*5)+(3*6)+(2*3)+(1*2)=61
61 % 10 = 1
So 356-32-1 is a valid CAS Registry Number.
InChI:InChI=1/C5H4F6O2/c1-13-3(12)5(10,11)4(8,9)2(6)7/h2H,1H3

356-32-1SDS

SAFETY DATA SHEETS

According to Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) - Sixth revised edition

Version: 1.0

Creation Date: Aug 13, 2017

Revision Date: Aug 13, 2017

1.Identification

1.1 GHS Product identifier

Product name METHYL 2,2,3,3,4,4-HEXAFLUOROBUTANOATE

1.2 Other means of identification

Product number -
Other names 1-Monohydrogenperfluor-n-buttersaeuremethylester

1.3 Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use

Identified uses For industry use only.
Uses advised against no data available

1.4 Supplier's details

1.5 Emergency phone number

Emergency phone number -
Service hours Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm (Standard time zone: UTC/GMT +8 hours).

More Details:356-32-1 SDS

356-32-1Downstream Products

356-32-1Relevant articles and documents

Electrocarboxylation of α,ω-dihaloperfluoroalkanes and of perfluoroalkylhalides in a near-critical and supercritical CO2-methanol medium

Mazin,Mysov,Sterlin,Grinberg

, p. 29 - 35 (1998)

The electrocatalytical carboxylations of some perfluoroalkylhalides and α,ω-dihaloperfluoroalkanes on copper and stainless steel electrodes in near-and supercritical CO2-methanol mixtures have been investigated. The main products and intermediates were determined. It was shown that the differences in the composition of products in these two cases indicate quite different catalytic activities of copper and stainless steel electrodes with regard to the electroreduction reactions of the intermediates and quite different adsorptions of these intermediates on the surfaces of the electrodes.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 356-32-1