V. Chauke, T. Nyokong / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 3662–3669
3663
2.2. Equipment
3084, 2951, 2930, 2864, 2378(S–C), 2225(C„N), 1444, 1283,
1202, 1181, 1173, 1145, 877, 847, 827, 725, 547, 447.
1H NMR (CDCl3): d, ppm 7.49 (2-H, s, Ar–H), 2.99–3.02 (4-H, t, –
CH2), 1.63–1.71 (4-H, m, –CH2), 1.37–1.46 (4-H, m, –CH2), 1.28–
1.36 (4-H, m, –CH2), 0.88–0.91 (6-H, t, –CH3).
Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (0.04–
0.063 mm) and preparative thin layer chromatography was per-
formed on silica gel 60 P F254. Ground state electronic absorption
spectra were performed on a Varian Cary 500 UV–Vis–NIR spectro-
photometer, infrared spectra (KBr pellets) on Perkin–Elmer Spec-
trum 2000 FT-IR Spectrometer and 1H nuclear magnetic
resonance signals on a Bruker EMX 400 NMR spectrometer. Ele-
mental analysis was performed at Rhodes University using a Var-
io-Elementar Microcube ELIII. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was
carried out at the University of Stellenbosch using an ABI Voyager
DE-STR MALDI-TOF instrument.
2.4.3. 3,6-Di(octylthio)-4,5-dicyanobenzene (3b), Scheme 1
Synthesis and purification of 3b were similar to that of com-
pound 3a, except 1-octanethiol was used instead of 1-pentane
thiol. The amounts of reagents employed were: 1-octanethiol
(2.39 g, 16.3 mmol), 3,6-bis(40-methylphenylsulfonyloxy) phthalo-
nitrile (2) (4.30 g, 9.18 mmol), ground anhydrous potassium car-
bonate (5.07 g, 36.7 mmol). Yield: 1.79 g, (58.1%). IR [(KBr)mmax
/
cmꢁ1]: 2920, 2850, 2388(S–C), 2225(C„N), 2023, 1637, 1466,
1422, 1204, 1143, 1032.
2.3. Electrochemical methods
1H NMR (CDCl3): d, ppm 7.40 (2-H, s, Ar–H), 2.98–3.10 (4-H, t, –
CH2), 1.62–1.75 (4-H, m, –CH2), 1.61–1.50 (4-H-broad m, –CH2),
1.40–1.52 (4-H, m, –CH2), 1.21–1.38 (18-H, m, –CH2CH2CH3).
Cyclic (CV) and square wave (SWV) voltammetry experiments
were performed using Autolab potentiostat PGSTAT 302 (Eco Che-
mie, Utrecht, The Netherlands) driven by the General Purpose Elec-
trochemical System data processing software (GPES, software
version 4.9, Eco Chemie), using a conventional three-electrode sys-
tem. A glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 3.0 mm diameter) was used as
the working electrode. Silver–silver chloride (Ag|AgCl) and plati-
num wire were used as pseudo-reference and counter electrodes,
respectively. Electrochemical experiments were performed in dry
DCM containing TBABF4 as the supporting electrolyte. Prior to
scans, the working electrode was polished with alumina paste on
a Buehler felt pad. This was followed by washing with de-ionised
water. Spectroelectrochemical data was recorded using an opti-
cally transparent thin-layer electrochemical (OTTLE) cell which
2.4.4. 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-Octapentylthiophthalocyaninato tantalum
(V) butoxide (4a, (OH)3TaOPTPc), Scheme 1
3,6-Dipentylthiophthalonitrile (3a) (0.8 g, 1.20 mmol) in 1-
pentanol (7.0 ml) was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere and
tantalum (V) butoxide (0.138 g, 0.34 mmol) was added. After the
addition of DBU (0.30 ml, 0.86 mmol), the reaction was continued
for 6 h. The mixture was cooled and column chromatography over
silica was done with CHCl3 as eluent. Yield: 0.25 g (42%). UV–Vis
(DCM): kmax (nm) (log
e) 276(6.36) 348(5.62) 722(5.44) 814
(5.81). IR [(KBr)
m
max/cmꢁ1]: 3290 (OH), 2922, 2852, 2350, 1561,
1459, 1361, 1310, 1279, 1156, 109, 932, 908(Ta–O), 750 (C–S–C).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d, ppm 7.65 (8H, s, Ar–H), 3.20 (16H,
broad s, S-CH2), 1.89 (16H, quintuplet, CH2), 1.61 (16H, quintuplet,
CH2), 1.50 (16H, sextuplet, CH2), 1.0 (24H, t, CH3). Anal. Calc.
was connected to
voltammograph.
a
Bioanalytical System (BAS) CV 27
2.4. Synthesis
C72H99N8S8O3Ta: C, 55.36; H, 6.38; N, 7.17. Found: C, 55.45; H,
7.21; N, 7.92%. MALDI-TOF MS m/z: Calcd: 1561.52 amu. Found:
(MꢁTa) 1330 amu.
A procedure similar to that reported in literature [25,26] was
employed for the synthesis of phthalonitriles (2 and 3) with slight
alterations as follows.
2.4.5. 1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-Octaoctylthiophthalocyaninato tantalum
(V) butoxide (4b, (OH)3TaOOTPc), Scheme 1
2.4.1. 3,6-Bis(40-methylphenylsulfonyloxy) phthalonitrile (2),
Scheme 1
Synthesis and purification of 4b were similar to that of com-
pound 4a, except 3b was employed instead of 3a. The amounts
of reagents employed were: 3,6-dioctylthiophthalonitrile (3b)
(0.81 g, 1.20 mmol, 1-pentanol (ꢀ8 ml), tantalum (V) butoxide
(0.139 g, 0.34 mmol), DBU (0.30 ml, 0.86 mmol). Yield 0.31 (48%).
p-Toluenesulfonyl chloride (10.32 g, 27 mmol) was added to a
mixture of 2,3-dicyanohydroquinone (1) (4.04 g, 12.5 mmol) and
potassium carbonate (13.8 g, 50 mmol) in acetone (15 ml). The
mixture was refluxed for 2 h. Thin layer chromatography (TLC)
was performed to determine the consumption of 2,3-dicyanohy-
droquinone. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured
to water (40 ml) and stirred for 1 h in water. The light brown prod-
uct was filtered and oven dried to give 2. Yield: 9.51 g (79%) IR
UV–Vis (DCM): kmax (nm) (log
717 (4.41), 814 (5.76). IR [(KBr)
e
) 416(3.82) 662(4.00) 609(3.73)
m
max/cmꢁ1]: 3419 (OH), 2955,
2920, 2850, 2538, 2400, 1637, 1563, 1432, 1368, 1312, 1281,
1223, 1181, 1142, 1091, 1031, 910, (Ta–O), 867, 787, 751 (C–S–
C), 720. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d, ppm 7.51 (8H, s, Ar–H), 3.2
(16H, broad s, S-CH2), 1.90 (32H, quintuplet, CH2), 1.79 (32H, quin-
tuplet, CH2), 1.05 (56H, sextuplet, CH2CH2CH3). Anal. Calc.
[(KBr)
m
max/cmꢁ1]: 3432, 3239, 3085, 2243, 2226 (CN), 1504,
1449, 1315, 1279, 1204, 1174, 1142, 1021, 1004, 979, 934, 847,
749, 694, 638, 614.
C96H147N8S8O3Ta: C, 60.72; H, 7.80; N, 5.90. Found: C, 60.92; H,
8.41; N, 6.42%. MALDI-TOF MS m/z: Calcd: 1898.16 amu. Found:
(MꢁTa) 1666.5 amu.
2.4.2. 3,6-Di(pentylthio)-4,5-dicyanobenzene (3a), Scheme 1
1-Pentanethiol (2.39 g, 22.9 mmol) was dissolved in DMSO un-
der a nitrogen atmosphere and 3,6-bis(40-methylphenylsulfonyl-
oxy) phthalonitrile (2) (4.30 g, 9.18 mmol) was added. The
mixture was stirred for 15 min and finely ground anhydrous potas-
sium carbonate (5.07 g, 36.7 mmol) was added in portions for 2 h
while stirring. The mixture was stirred under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere for a further 12 h. Water was added and the aqueous phase
extracted using chloroform (3 ꢂ 50 ml). The extracts were further
treated with 5% sodium carbonate solution (2 ꢂ 250 ml). The solu-
tion was further treated with water (2 ꢂ 250 ml) and the solvent
was evaporated off using a rotavapor. The product 3a was recrys-
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and characterisation
Scheme 1 gives the synthesis pathways for the TaPc complexes
discussed in this work. 3,6-Bis(40-methylphenylsulfonyloxy) pht-
halonitrile (2), was used to prepare 3,6-disubstituted phthalonitri-
le derivatives (3a and 3b), through base-catalysed nucleophilic
aromatic displacement. The reactions were carried out in DMSO
at room temperature and gave yields of 71.7% for 3a and 58.1%
tallised from ethanol. Yield: 2.19 g (71.7%). IR [(KBr)m
max/cmꢁ1]: