C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2. Attachment of 1 to a Gold Surface
the SPR instrument and irradiated with UV light (carried out as
above for solution-phase irradiations) to photoisomerize surface-
attached (E)-1 to (Z)-1. The surface was returned to the instrument,
and injection of enzyme (2.0 µM) was repeated to assess the extent
of enzyme binding after this photoisomerization (see Figure 2b,
curve 2). A significantly higher response was observed compared
to that before irradiation (curve 1). Therefore, significantly more
enzyme binds to the surface after UV irradiation. After removal of
attached enzyme as above, the surface was irradiated with visible
light to “switch back” to the less active E-enriched state [(E)-1],
and injection of enzyme was repeated. The response (curve 3) was
essentially identical to the initial response before UV irradiation,
corresponding to a similar amount of enzyme binding. These results
show that the surface can be reversibly photoswitched between two
states, one of which binds a significantly larger amount of enzyme.
Thus, photochemical switching can modulate binding of R-chy-
motrypsin to a surface.
cloaddition. In particular, a solution of compound 1, CuBr, sodium
ascorbate, 2,2′-bipyridine, and 2,6-lutidine in 1:1 DMF/H2O was
placed onto the gold surface, and after 1 h, the surface was rinsed
with 1:1 DMF/H2O, 0.1 M EDTA, and H2O to ensure complete
removal of unbound reactants. Successful attachment of 1 was
inferred since this modified surface gave photoregulated enzyme
binding consistent with the solution-phase photoswitching of 1 (see
below).
The binding of R-chymotrypsin to the surface with attached 1
was then monitored by SPR. Solutions of enzyme (0, 2.0, 6.0, and
18 µM) were separately injected over the surface for periods of
300 s to monitor enzyme binding to the surface, and after each
experiment, buffer was run over the surface for 300 s to monitor
detachment of enzyme (Figure 2a, enzyme injection at t ) 70 s).
Remaining enzyme was washed from the surface by injections of
guanidine (6 M, 5 µL), followed by acetic acid (1 M, 10 µL), to
rapidly regenerate the surface after each measurement. For each
nonzero enzyme concentration, the SPR response increased over
the period enzyme was injected relative to the surface control
lacking attached 1. Furthermore, the response was enhanced for
each increase in enzyme concentration (0 f 18 µM in Figure 2a),
which is consistent with attachment of enzyme to the surface. This
represents binding of enzyme to approximately 10% of the
theoretical maximum number of surface-attached inhibitor mol-
ecules (see Supporting Information S5), at the highest enzyme
concentration. Next, the enzyme-free surface was removed from
Reversible photoswitching of R-chymotrypsin binding to a
surface-attached inhibitor has been demonstrated. The approach is
simple, efficient, and the inhibitor design modular. Ongoing studies
are focused on further improving photoswitching, extension of the
system to a range of other proteases, and attachment to other solid
supports.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Nathan Alexander for the
synthesis of compound 7, and Fiona Clow for help with SPR.
Financial support from the Royal Society of NZ Marsden Fund
and the ARC (DP0771901) are also gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
calculation of the maximum possible SPR response on binding of
R-chymotrypsin to the modified surface, synthesis of 1, 3, 5, 6, and 8,
1H and 13C NMR spectra for 1, 3, 5, 6, and 8. This material is available
References
(1) Auernheimer, J.; Dahmen, C.; Hersel, U.; Bausch, A.; Kessler, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16107.
(2) Blonder, R.; Levi, S.; Tao, G.; Ben-Dov, I.; Willner, I. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 10467.
(3) Hayashi, G.; Hagihara, M.; Dohno, C.; Nakatani, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 8678.
(4) Pearson, D.; Abell, A. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3618.
(5) Westmark, P. R.; Kelly, J. P.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
3416.
(6) Abell, A. D.; Jones, M. A.; Neffe, A. T.; Aitken, S. G.; Cain, T. P.; Payne,
R. J.; McNabb, S. B.; Coxon, J. M.; Stuart, B. G.; Pearson, D.; Lee, H.
Y.-Y.; Morton, J. D. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2916.
(7) The use of amine chemistry for surface attachment was deemed inap-
propriate since it is incompatible with the constituent trifluoromethylketone
group.
(8) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2004.
Figure 2. SPR sensorgrams for binding of R-chymotrypsin to surfaces
modified with 1. SPR data simultaneously recorded for a control surface
were subtracted from these plots. (a) Binding of a range of R-chymotrypsin
concentrations (0, 2.0, 6.0, 18 µM) to the surface. (b) Photoswitching of
R-chymotrypsin (2.0 µM) binding to the surface. Key: (1) surface before
irradiation; (2) surface after UV irradiation; (3) surface after UV then visible
irradiation.
(9) Pearson, D. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, 2007.
(10) McPhee, M. M.; Kerwin, S. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2809.
(11) Coleman, G. H.; McCloskey, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943, 65, 1588.
(12) Peet, N. P.; Burkhart, J. P.; Angelastro, M. R.; Giroux, E. L.; Mehdi, S.;
Bey, P.; Kolb, M.; Neises, B.; Schirlin, D. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 394.
(13) See ref 4 for a discussion on relative binding of E and Z isomers.
JA0766674
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 48, 2007 14863