508
T.S. Lobana et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 10 (2007) 506–509
plex 1. The N12A–Pd–S bite angle in complexes 1 and N1–
Pd–S angle of 3 are similar, whereas N12A–Pd–N11A
{80.79(16)°} bite angle of 1 and O–Pd–N1 {92.99(5)°}
angle of 3 are quite different. This may be attributed to
the fact that in 1 the N donor atom is part of the five mem-
bered pyrrole ring, whereas in complex 3 the O atom is exo-
cyclic. Thus system 1 is more strained as compared to 3,
this also explains the difference in trans angles N11A–
PdA–S1A {164.22(12)°} and O–Pd–S {177.14(4)°}.
d
ligand) = 30.08 ppm (31P NMR spectra were recorded by
taking TMP {(MeO)3P} as external reference taken at zero
position).
Crystallographic data for 1: C24H21N4PPdS, M =
˚
˚
534.88, triclinic, a = 10.307(2) A, b = 14.962(3) A, c =
˚
24.351(5) A, a = 100.908(4)°, b = 99.508(4)°, c = 107.255
3
˚
ꢀ
(3)°, V = 3422.0(12) A , T = 293(2) K, space group P1
(No. 2),
q , Z = 6, l(Mo Ka) =
calcd = 1.557 g cmÀ3
0.994 mmÀ1, 21,136 reflections measured on a Bruker
SMART CCD-1000 diffractometer unique 15,007
(Rint = 0.0382). The final R1 0.0490 was for 10,152 reflec-
tions [I > 2r(I)] and wR2 was 0.1233. Crystals 3.
C26H22N3OPPdS’, M = 561.90, Triclinic, a = 7.5551(2),
1H NMR spectrum of compounds 1 and 3 were recorded
in CDCl3. In the spectrum of complex 1, the absence of –
N2H and –N4H hydrogens, at 11.28 and 11.34 ppm respec-
tively for free ligands [4], confirmed their deprotonation,
followed by coordination to Pd center as a dianion. Other
characteristic peaks of the thiosemicarbazone ligand are:
C2H 5.65(s), C5H(q) 5.80, C4H(dd) 6.49, C6H(d)
7.18 ppm. In addition, PPh3 ring peaks also appear in the
spectra in the region, 7.48–7.67 ppm. The 31P NMR
spectrum shows a single peak at À79.2 ppm with a coordi-
nation shift, Dd(dcomplex–dligand) = 33.9 ppm, supporting
coordination of P atom to Pd. In the IR spectrum, the
m(N–H) band due to –N2H– moiety appears at 3152 cmÀ1
in the free ligand, which is absent in complex 1. Similarly
for complex 3, the spectrum showed the absence of –OH
and –N2H proton signals {cf. –OH, 9.87 and –N2H,
11.38 ppm, free ligand}, confirming double deprotonation.
31P NMR also showed a single peak with a coordination
shift of 30.08 ppm.
As depicted in Scheme 1, the deprotonation of acidic
hydrogen such as –N4H and –OH in rings at C2 carbon
facilitates tricoordination by the thiosemicarbazone as dia-
nions in 1 and 3, thus retaining one PPh3 ligand, while lack
of acidic hydrogen as in 2, retains one Cl and not PPh3 in
view of overall charge balance. The Cl in 2 is not appearing
as anion such as in anticipated, [Pd(g3-N4,N3,S-pytsc)
(PPh3)]Cl, thus presumably {Pd(g3-N4, N3, S-pytsc)} spe-
cies has strong affinity to bring Cl in coordination sphere,
leading to exit of PPh3.
˚
b = 10.2388(3), c = 17.0045(5) A, a = 77.04, b = 80.8980
3
˚
(10), c = 71.54°, V = 1210.52(6) A , T = 298(2) K, space
group P1 (No. 2), qcalcd = 1.542 g cmÀ3, Z = 2, l(Mo
ꢀ
Ka) = 0.943 mmÀ1, 13,980 reflections measured on a Bru-
ker SMART CCD-1000 diffractometer unique 6826
(Rint = 0.0146). The final R1 0.0246 was for 6203 reflections
[I > 2r(I)] and wR2 was 0.0639.
Acknowledgement
Financial support from CSIR, New Delhi, to one of us
(Gagandeep) is gratefully acknowledged.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
CCDC 627413 and 627414 contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for 1 and 3. These data can be
graphic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: depos-
it@ccdc.cam.ac.uk. Supplementary data associated with
this article can be found, in the online version, at
In conclusion, an acidic hydrogen in the ring has impor-
tant role in determining coordination modes of thiosemic-
arbazones, and tricoordination by pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde
thiosemicarbazone (H2ptsc) is first example.
References
Compound 1: Mp. 240–242 °C (dec.), yield: 0.025 g,
62%. C, H, N, analysis for C24H21N4PPdS: C, 53.9; H,
3.92; N, 10.48; Found: C, 53.5; H, 3.64; N, 9.51. Main
IR Peaks (KBr, cmÀ1): m(N–H), 3463m, 3342m, 3280m
(–NH2); m(C–H), 3072w; d(NH2) + m(C@N) + m(C–C),
1600m, 1566s, 1517s; m(C@S) + m(C–N), 1033s, 1000w,
850w (thioamide moiety). 3: Mp. 230–232 °C, yield:
0.025 g, 60%;. C, H, N, analysis for C26H22N3OSPPd: C,
55.61; H, 3.92; N, 7.50; Found: C, 55.74; H, 3.89; N,
7.81. Main IR peaks (KBr, cmÀ1), m(NH) 3438s, m(C–H)
3101m, m(C@N) + dNH2 + m(C@C) 1635m, 1591s, 1529s,
m(C@S) 939w, m(P–C) 1097s 1H NMR data (d, ppm;
CDCl3), 8.25 (d, 1H, C2H), 4.71 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.60–6.69
(m, 1H, C5H), 7.40–7.78 (17H, Ph-H + C4,6) ppm. 31P
[1] E. Bermejo, A. Castineiras, T. Perez, R. Carballo, W. Hitler, Z.
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 627 (2001) 2377.
[2] T.S. Lobana, Rekha, R.J. Butcher, Transi. Met. Chem. 29 (2004)
291.
[3] R. Alonso, E. Bermejo, R. Carballo, A. Castineiras, T. Perez, Z.
Naturoforsch. B. Chem. Sci. 56 (2001) 219.
[4] T.S. Lobana, A. Sanchez, J.S. Casas, A. Castineiras, J. Sordo, M.S.
Garcia-Tasende, E.M. Vazquez-Lopez, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.
(1997) 4289.
[5] (a) R. Alonso, E. Bermejo, A. Castineiras, T. Perez, R. Carballo, Z.
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 623 (1997) 818;
(b) R. Carballo, A. Castineiras, T. Perez, Z. Naturoforsch. B. Chem.
Sci. 56 (2001) 881.
[6] Y. Kang, N. Yang, S.O. Kang, J. Ko, C.-H. Lee, Y.-H. Lee,
Organometallics 16 (1997) 5522.
[7] D. Kovala-Demertzi, J.R. Miller, N. Kourkoumelis, S.K. Had-
jikakou, M.A. Demertzis, Polyhedron 18 (1999) 1005.
NMR data (d, ppm, CDCl3), À83.073 ppm, Dd(dcomplex
–