(17-19 steps). Although a quite recent report (ref 6) presents
the very concise asymmetric synthesis of 1 in 12 steps, the
starting material is the natural product, quinic acid. Then,
an efficient and convergent approach to 1 remains highly
desirable. We present here a concise asymmetric synthesis
of 1 by chiral auxiliary multiuse methodology, in which the
auxiliary works not only for asymmetric induction but also
for regio- and stereoselective transformations and as a
protecting group of hydroxyl functions.
5, since its upper side is shielded by the 8-membered acetal
ring. The olefinic part (X-Y) in 5 would be olefin itself or
synthetic equivalent of olefin. Then 5 would be converted
to the macrolactone 6 by the selective transformations. Final
removal of 1,2-diphenylethylene unit would give (+)-Sch
642305 (1).
Conversion of the ene bromide 3 to the enone 4 was
achieved by hydroboration-oxidation10 (Scheme 2). Hy-
The synthetic plan for (+)-Sch 642305 (1) is shown in
Scheme 1. Our synthesis starts from the bromo acetal 3,
Scheme 2. Conversion of 3 to the Enone Acetal 4
Scheme 1. Synthetic Plan for (+)-Sch 642305
droboration of 3 followed by PDC oxidation gave the
â-bromo ketone, from which spontaneous elimination of HBr
occurred, giving the enone 4. The use of BH3‚SMe2 afforded
the desired enone 4 in 35% yield (entry 1). The more bulky
borane reagent, thexylborane, increased the yield (53%) of
4 (entry 2). However, the use of more bulky borane reagent,
thexylborane cyclohexane complex, did not react at all (entry
3). The use of PCC in place of PDC decreased the yield of
4 (entry 4). The three-dimensional structure of 4 from its
Dreiding model showed that the upper side of the cyclohex-
ene ring is shielded by the axial C-C bond and the
methylene group of the 8-membered acetal ring, which fixes
the conformation.
Since direct alkylation at the R′-position of the enone 4
using a 6C-unit aliphatic trifluoromethane sulfonate or iodide
failed, we attempted to introduce the 6C-unit by aldol
reaction of aldehyde 7.11 Aldol reaction of 4 with 7 proceeded
smoothly. As expected, it occurred from the sterically less
hindered R-face of the cyclohexenone ring, and 8 was
obtained as the diastereomerically pure form. The stereo-
chemistry at the C6-position of 8 was deduced from
mechanistic considerations and finally determined by an NOE
experiment of xanthate 9.12 Although the stereochemistry of
the secondary alcohol at the C7-position was not determined,
it was tentatively deduced to be S by consideration of the
6-membered transition state.13 Several trials for reducing the
which was previously synthesized by intramolecular bro-
moetherification of cyclohexadiene acetal 27 and has con-
vertible olefin and bromine moieties in the molecule.
Furthermore, the 8-membered acetal moiety derived from
the chiral auxiliary, (R,R)-hydrobenzoin, fixes the conforma-
tion of the cyclohexene ring promising high regio- and
stereoselective transformations. Since several methods to
remove the hydrobenzoin unit are available,8 we planned to
remove it at the final stage of the synthesis and hoped that
the auxiliary would work not only as a protecting group of
the alcohol part but also as a template for controlling the
regio- and stereochemistry during the synthesis. We supposed
the conversion of 3 to the enone 4 by regioselective
hydroboration-oxidation at C1-position in the influence of
the acetal ring. Introduction of a 6C unit at the R′-position
(C6-position) of the enone 49 was postulated to occur from
R-side of the cyclohexane ring to give R-alkylated compound
(4) Ishigami, K.; Katsuta, R.; Watanabe, H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2224-
2230.
(5) Snider, B.; Zhou, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1283-1286.
(6) Wilson, E. M.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1327-1329.
(7) (a) Fujioka, H.; Kotoku, N.; Sawama, Y.; Nagatomi, Y.; Kita, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4825-4828. (b) Fujioka, H.; Kotoku, N.;
Sawama, Y.; Kitagawa, H.; Ohba, Y.; Wang, T.-L.; Nagatomi, Y.; Kita, Y.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 952-957. We obtained 3 in 63% yield from
2 in ref 7a. In ref 7b, a similar compound, in which the MeO group of 3 is
replaced by a MeOCH2 group, was obtained in 57% yield. For the procedure
to obtain 3, see the Supporting Information.
(8) Oxidation of alcohol followed by reductive elimination: (a) Alexakis,
A.; Trevitt, G. P.; Bermardinelli, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4358-
4359. Oxidation of alcohol followed by Baeyer-Villigar reaction and
methanolysis: (b) McNamara, J. M.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 7371-7372. Birch reduction or hydrogenolysis: (c) Fujioka, H.;
Kitagawa, H, Nagatomi, Y.; Kita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 411-416.
Using CAN: (e) Fujioka, H.; Hirose, H.; Ohba, Y.; Murai, K.; Nakahara,
K.; Kita, Y. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 638-643.
(10) Surendra U. K.; Herbert C. B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 172,
c20-c22.
(11) Yu, M.; Alonso-Galicia, M.; Sun, C-W.; Roman, R. J.; Ono, N.;
Hirano, H.; Ishimoto, T.; Reddy, Y. K.; Katipally, K. R.; Reddy, K. M.;
Gopal, V. R.; Yu, J.; Yakhi, M.; Frank, J. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003,
11, 2803-2821.
(12) NOE was observed between the C4-R-proton and the C7-proton in
9.
(9) The numbering is the same as that for (+)-Sch 642305 (1).
5606
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 26, 2007