.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Enantioselective aziridination by different [Co(D2-Por*)].[a]
Entry Catalyst
Ar
Solvent Yield [%][b] ee [%][c]
1[d]
2[d]
3[d]
4[d]
5
6
7
8
9
[Co(P1)]
[Co(TPP)] o-FC6H4 (2a)
o-FC6H4 (2a)
PhH
PhH
50[e]
trace
95
95
94
À47
–
[Co(P1)]
[Co(P2)]
[Co(P3)]
[Co(P3)]
[Co(P3)]
[Co(P3)]
–
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhH
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhH
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhH
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhCl
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhF
À66
73
90
91
92
90
–
Figure 1. Hydrogen-bonding in postulated nitrene radical complex.
in the ortho position in fluoroaryl azides, formation of single
80
94
À
(Figure 1A) or double (Figure 1B) N H···F hydrogen bonds
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) hexane 72
2,4,6-F3C6H2 (2b) PhH NR
À
between the amide N H elements of amidoporphyrins and
the F atoms in ortho position of fluoroaryl groups would be
attainable. On the basis of this hypothesis, we embarked on
a research project to study the catalytic asymmetric olefin
aziridination with fluoroaryl azides by [Co(D2-Por*)].
As an outcome of this effort, we report herein a highly
effective catalytic system that is based on a new generation of
chiral CoII metalloradical catalysts for asymmetric aziridina-
tion of alkenes with fluoroaryl azides. The CoII-catalyzed
aziridination is suitable for a wide range of aromatic olefins
and fluoroaryl azides, producing the corresponding N-fluo-
roaryl aziridines in high yields with excellent enantioselectiv-
ities. In addition to tolerating a wide variety of fluoroaryl
azides as nitrene sources, the new metalloradical aziridination
process features a practical protocol that operates at room
temperature without the need of excess olefin, generating N2
as the only by-product.
At the outset of our studies, we evaluated the catalytic
capability of different D2-symmetric chiral amidoporphyrins
[Co(D2-Por*)] in the aziridination of styrene (1a) with 2-
fluorophenyl azide (2a; Table 1). Catalyzed by [Co(P1)]
(2 mol%; P1 = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-ChenPhyrin),[15] the reaction
in benzene went smoothly even at room temperature, and
afforded the desired aziridine product in 50% yield and
47% ee (Table 1, entry 1). Subsequent experiments showed
that [Co(TPP)] (TPP = 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin) was
an ineffective catalyst for the reaction under the same
conditions (Table 1, entry 2). The notable difference in
catalytic capability between [Co(P1)] and [Co(TPP)] is in
[a] Carried out with olefin (1 equiv, 0.2m), azide (1.2 equiv), and [Co(D2-
Por*)] (1 mol%). [b] Yields of isolated products. [c] Determined by HPLC
on a chiral stationary phase. [d] 2 mol% catalyst loading. [e] Yield
determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy. Product mixture contained 2a
(10%), azofluorobenzene (15%), fluoroaniline (10%), and unknown
components (15%). Entry in bold marks optimized reaction conditions.
chiral amidoporphyrin 3,5-di-tert-butyl-Xu(2’-Naph)Phyrin
(P3),[17] whose CoII complex [Co(P3)] was shown to be the
optimal catalyst for the process, giving the desired product in
94% yield and 90% ee even with only 1 mol% of catalyst
loading (Table 1, entry 5). Among various solvents that were
screened, fluorobenzene was found to be the solvent of
choice, giving the aziridine product in high yield (94%) and
excellent enantioselectivity (92% ee) at room temperature
(Table 1, entries 5–8). As expected, control experiments in
the absence of a catalyst gave no reaction (Table 1, entry 9).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, we then used
the aziridination of styrene as a model reaction to investigate
the scope and limitation of fluoroaryl azides as nitrene
sources (Table 2). As in the case of aryl azide 2b, which has
two F atoms in ortho position (Table 1), the use of the new
metalloradical catalyst, [Co(P3)], also led to significant
improvement in enantioselectivity for the aziridination reac-
tion with aryl azide 2a, which contains one F atom in ortho
position (Table 2, entry 1 versus Table 1, entry 1). The
[Co(P3)]-based catalytic aziridination system could effec-
tively employ other mono-ortho-fluoro-substituted aryl
azides as nitrene sources, as demonstrated by the use of
2,4,5-trifluorophenyl azide (2c) (Table 2, entry 2). In addition
to azide 2b, various other di-ortho-fluoro-substituted aryl
azides, including 2,6-difluoro-, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-, and penta-
fluorophenyl azides (2d–f), were shown to be highly effective
nitrene sources for the CoII-based aziridination process,
yielding the corresponding aziridines in high yields with
excellent enantioselectivities (Table 2, entries 3–5). Presum-
À
line with our assumption about the possible role of N H···F
hydrogen-bonding interaction in activating the fluoroaryl
azide (Figure 1A). Further studies showed that 2,4,6-trifluor-
ophenyl azide (2b) also effectively aziridinated styrene under
[Co(P1)] catalysis, affording the corresponding aziridine in
95% yield and 66% ee (Table 1, entry 3). The observed
improvement in reactivity and stereoselectivity with azide 2b,
which contains two F atoms in ortho position, is ascribed to
À
the potential formation of the double N H···F hydrogen
bonds in the postulated CoIII–nitrene radical intermediate
(Figure 1B). Further improvement in enantioselectivity was
achieved for aziridination of styrene with azide 2b when
[Co(P2)] (P2 = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-QingPhyrin), a second-gener-
ation metalloradical catalyst that was previously shown to be
highly effective for asymmetric intramolecular cyclopropa-
nation,[16] was employed as a catalyst, reaching 73% ee and
the same high yield (Table 1, entry 4). Successive studies
resulted in the design and synthesis of a new D2-symmetric
À
ably as a result of additional N H···F hydrogen-bonding
interactions in the postulated CoIII–nitrene radical intermedi-
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!