C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
paved the way for oxidation to the ketone. Subsequent treatment
with TMSOTf resulted both in hydrolysis of the tert-butyl ester
and protection of the C(4) hydroxyl as the TMS ether. A remarkably
selective removal of the TBDPS group (TBAF, 0 °C) in the presence
of the tertiary TMS and secondary TBS ethers was then achieved.
Macrolactonization employing the Yamaguchi conditions9 com-
pleted construction of the desired macrolactone (+)-17 in good yield
(ca. 77%).
Synthesis of the requisite vinyl stannane (5) for installation of
the C(26-33) (E,Z)-dienamide side chain began with known cis-
2-iodomethylacrylate (Scheme 4);10 a copper-mediated union11 with
butyramide led to the cis-enamide 18. Hydrolysis of the methyl
ester, followed by stereospecific iododecarboxylation,12 furnished
the desired cis-iodoenamide 20 as a single isomer. Surprisingly,
however, Pd-catalyzed stannylation of 20 resulted in isomerization
of the olefin to the trans isomer. As a result, we reversed the Stille
coupling partners for the side-chain attachment, making use of cis-
iodoenamide 20. This tactical revision required preparation of the
vinyl stannane from (+)-17.
extensive 2D NMR studies (COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, HMBC,
HSQC) of (+)-3 both confirmed the connectivities and permitted
unambiguous assignment of all carbon resonances in the 13C NMR.
Finally, no epimerization was observed in any of the transformations
after construction of (+)-14.
In addition to the synthesis of the proposed structure for lituarine
C [(+)-3], we also completed the synthesis of the proposed structure
of lituarine B (2) (Scheme 6). To this end, addition of acetic
anhydride to (+)-3 led chemoselectively to acetylation of the C5
hydroxyl to provide (+)-2. As with (+)-3 and lituarine C, the
spectral properties of synthetic (+)-2 did not match those reported
for lituarine B.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of the Proposed Structure of Lituarine B
Scheme 4. Synthesis of C(28-33) Enamide Coupling Partner
Taken together, the X-ray crystallographic data, in conjunction
with the 1D and 2D NMR studies, permit assignment of the
structures of synthetic (+)-2 and (+)-3. Current work is directed
toward the determination of the structures of the natural lituarines
by synthesis of related diastereomers.
Acknowledgment. Support was provided by the National
Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute) through Grant CA-
19033 and Merck & Co., Inc. M.O.D. is grateful to the NIH (NCI)
for a postdoctoral fellowship. We also thank Drs. George W. Furst
and Sangrama Sahoo for NMR expertise, Dr. Patrick M. Carroll
for the X-ray analyses, and Professor Vidal for helpful discussions.
Toward this end, removal of the dithiane in (+)-17 employing
the Stork protocol13 was followed by stannylation of the C(27) vinyl
iodide moiety (Scheme 5). Stille union with cis-iodoenamide 20
resulted in installation of the requisite C(26-33) (E,Z)-dienamide.
Completion of the proposed structure of lituarine C [(+)-3] was
then achieved by removal of the silicon protecting groups (TASF).14
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic and analytical data for all new compounds. This material
Scheme 5. Completion of Synthesis
References
(1) (a) Vidal, J.-P.; Escale, R.; Girard, J.-P.; Rossi, J.-C.; Chantraine, J.-M.;
Aumelas, A. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5857. (b) Optical rotation data were
not obtained for the lituarines.
(2) Smith, A. B., III; Frohn, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3979.
(3) Smith, A. B., III; Walsh, S. P.; Frohn, M.; Duffey, M. O. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 139.
(4) (a) Robertson, J.; Dallimore, J. W. P.; Meo, P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3857.
(b) Robertson, J.; Meo, P.; Dallimore, J. W. P.; Doyle, B. M.; Hoarau, C.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2861. (c) Robertson, J.; Dallimore, J. W. P. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 5007.
With (+)-3 in hand, we quickly recognized that the spectral
properties did not match those of the natural lituarine C.1,15 Although
to date we have been unable to obtain crystals of (+)-3 suitable
for X-ray crystallographic analysis, we do have convincing data to
support the structural assignment of (+)-3. First, X-ray crystal-
lography confirmed the stereochemical assignments of the
C(1-19) tricyclic iodide (+)-7,5 as well as the C(21) and C(24)
stereogenicity in (-)-12.5 The geometry of the (E,Z)-dienamide was
assigned by 1H NMR; specifically, the H28-H29 coupling constant
(J ) 10 Hz) is consistent with a Z olefin, while the H26-H27
coupling constant (J ) 15 Hz) verifies an E olefin.16 For com-
parison, the C(26-33) (E,E)-dienamide corresponding to (+)-3 was
also constructed.5 In the E,E congener, the H28-H29 coupling
constant (J ) 14 Hz) was significantly larger, thereby supporting
the Z character of the C(28-29) olefin in (+)-3. In addition,
(5) See Supporting Information.
(6) Myers, A. G.; McKinskey, L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2428.
(7) Oppolzer, W.; Radinov, R. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5777.
(8) Takai, K.; Nitta, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7408.
(9) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989.
(10) Ma, S.; Lu, X.; Li, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 709.
(11) Jiang, L.; Job, G. E.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
3667.
(12) Homsi, F.; Rousseau, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1495.
(13) Stork, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 290.
(14) TASF was selected due to the mild basicity to avoid the possibility of
Payne rearrangement; see: Scheidt, K. A.; Chen, H.; Follows, B. C.;
Chemler, S. R.; Coffey, D. S.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
6436.
(15) For an excellent review on misassigned natural product structures and
the role of chemical synthesis, see: Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, S. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1012.
(16) Bothner-By, A. A.; Naar-Colin, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 236.
JA078293K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 2, 2008 423