TABLE 1. Addition of MeLi-CeCl3 to
SCHEME 4
4-(5-Isoxazolyl)benzonitrilea
isoxazole
(g)
sonication
time (h)
CeCl3
(g)
yield
(%)
entry
footnote
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
5.75
10.87
44.85
68.6
none
2
4
5.5
5
4
25
25
25
25
25
47.13
195
298.4
0
30
95
45
47
83
100
100
b
b
b
b
b
c
d
d, e
21
43
a CeCl3-MeLi complex was formed by addition of 0.85 mol of freshly
titrated MeLi-Et2O to each mol of CeCl3. The product purity was >80%
by NMR unless otherwise stated. b CeCl3 as 10 mesh beads with magnetic
stirring. c Milled CeCl3 with magnetic stirring. d Milled CeCl3 with soni-
cation and simultaneous overhead stirring. e For runs of this scale, the results
were unchanged with stirring and sonication times between 16 and 48 h.
2-5 and was encouraging. Magnetic stirring became impractical
as the reaction scale was increased; for a run attempted using
17 g of nitrile 2 and 74 g of CeCl3, the mixture could no longer
be stirred reliably using magnetic means even though the CeCl3
had been milled prior to the start of the run. Additionally,
commercial CeCl3 in THF is a heavy suspension that needs
strong stirring to prevent it from settling. For larger scale runs,
magnetic stirring was changed to overhead stirring to ensure
that the CeCl3 would remain well suspended during the reaction
(entries 7 and 8). This change also allowed for simultaneous
stirring and sonication operations.
Typically, large-scale runs were set up to sonicate and stir
for 16 h (overnight); stirring and sonication times longer than
this were not detrimental to the product yield or purity. In all
cases, when the mixture was stirred and sonicated, a quantitative
yield of the amine was obtained and product purity was high
(>80%, NMR estimate). The reaction noted in entry 8 was
performed several times on the scale indicated; the scale up
was limited by the size of the reaction flask (5 L) that could be
placed into the sonicator. The color of the reaction mixture
typically became faint yellow during or after the addition of
methyllithium. These runs invariably led to good conversion to
the desired product. In runs where the reaction picked up a
pronounced deep yellow color9 during the addition, the yield
was poor or the reaction failed completely. This observation
was more common for the initial magnetically stirred runs and
not typical for those done with combined overhead stirring and
sonication.
With a proven method for the preparation of the desired
benzylamine 3a, this compound was converted immediately into
the Boc derivative 3b (Scheme 4). The yield of 3b over both
steps was 82%. The isoxazole was opened with NaOC2H5 to
give cyanoketone 4 (92%); this was next converted into
acrylonitrile 5 (62%). Guanidine 8 was prepared from com-
mercially available 4-nitrophenylethyl alcohol (Scheme 5). This
alcohol was coupled to morpholine through the corresponding
mesylate intermediate.10 Reduction of the nitro group provided
aniline 7,11 which was finally converted to guanidine 8 by
treatment with 3,5-dimethylpyrazole-1-carboxamidine nitrate (90
°C) for 1 h (43%).12
CeCl3-THF mixture was sonicated for 1 h prior to cooling the
suspension and generating the organocerium complex leading
to 77% to 97% isolated yields of the addition product for the
examples reported. In a subsequent report, CeCl3 sonication was
used in the addition of MeLi-CeCl3 to a nitrile during the
preparation of the (R)-3-(1-amino-1-methylethyl)pyrrolidine
group of the antiinfective agent PD-138312.7 Sonication was
shown to be important to aid in the addition of organocerium
reagents to carbonyl groups and may also be important for
cerium-mediated additions to the nitrile group. While encour-
aged by these examples, there was no report of this addition in
the presence of the strongly sensitive isoxazole. Nevertheless,
it is clear that sonication should, at a minimum, help to keep
the CeCl3 more finely suspended in THF facilitating its
activation.
In our work, commercially available anhydrous CeCl3 (10
mesh beads) was preferred over the heptahydrate because the
drying step was eliminated.8 Examination of representative runs
(Table 1) indicates that little product was isolated when the
CeCl3 suspension was stirred magnetically prior to methyllithium
addition (entry 1). When the CeCl3 in THF was initially
sonicated prior to methyllithium addition, the yields improved,
but inconsistent results were still obtained (entries 2-5). It is
possible that these results were due to nonuniform or excessively
large CeCl3 particle size obtained even after the sonication of
the commercial reagent. The magnetic stirring used in these runs
may be inadequate to fully suspend the CeCl3. The net result
of this situation would be the presence of excess methyllithium
to the extent that a substantial portion of the CeCl3 was unavail-
able to react. To address this possibility, instead of using 10
mesh anhydrous CeCl3, this reagent was ground to a fine powder
using a commercial household coffee bean grinder. The grinding
operation was carried out in a nitrogen-flushed glovebag and
the CeCl3 powder was transferred to a flask in the glovebag.
The initial run (entry 6) with finely ground and sonicated
CeCl3 appeared to address the inconsistent results for entries
(6) Greeves, N.; Lyford, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4759.
(7) (a) Fedij, V.; Lenoir, E. A., III; Suto, M. J.; Zeller, J. R.; Wemple,
J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 1131. To the best of our knowledge,
prior to this report, there were no examples of sonication-assisted addition
of MeLi-CeCl3 to nitriles. These authors did not indicate whether sonication
altered the yield, purity, or percent ee of their product. (b) After our work
was completed an alternate method for CeCl3 activation was reported:
Limanto, J.; Dorner, B.; Devine, P. N. Synthesis, 2006, 4143.
(9) Incomplete or improperly dried CeCl3 has been known to cause yellow
gummy reaction mixtures, see: Dimitrov, V.; Kostova, K.; Genov, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6787.
(10) Palmer, B. D.; Lee, H. H.; Johnson, P.; Baguley, B. C.; Wickham,
G.; Wakelin, L. P. G.; McFadyen, W. D.; Denny, W. A. J. Med. Chem.
1990, 33, 3008.
(11) Leffler, M. T.; Volwiler, E. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 896.
(12) An alternate route to guanidine 8 can be found in: Adams, J. L.;
Drewry, D. H.; Linn, J. A. WO 2007/018941 A2.
(8) Takeda, N.; Imamoto, T. In Organic Synthesis; Martin, S. F., Ed.;
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1999; Vol. 76, p 228.
1122 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 73, No. 3, 2008