having R-hydrogens,6 the alkylation of alkyl dihalides with
monocarbene anions,7 the reaction of highly reduced pen-
tacarbonylmetalates with bis-amides,8 and the reductive
coupling of alkenyl carbenes.9 All of these methods usually
lead to low yields of the desired complex or are even unable
to produce it.
Scheme 1
Modification of a mononuclear metal-carbene complex
by using a transition-metal-catalyzed reaction would be a
simple answer to obtain elaborated bi- and polymetallic
structures. Nevertheless, the use of transition-metal catalysts
to effect transformations in group 6 metal carbene complexes
is often hampered by the transmetalation reaction of the metal
carbene to the catalysts.10 Our ongoing project directed to
prepare new macrocyclic structures based on a bi- and
polymetallic macrocyclic Fischer carbene scaffolds11 required
an easy and efficient route to alkynyl tethered bis-carbene
complexes. The oxidative coupling of terminal acetylenes
was an attractive way to access these structures. However,
the reactivity of the catalyst in the alkyne coupling had to
be preferred to the transmetalation reaction. For this reason
and based on our experience with catalytic reactions of
Fischer carbene complexes,10 the Hay12 modification of the
original Glaser coupling reaction was chosen. Reported
herein is the successful implementation of this idea to obtain
new bis-carbene complexes as building blocks for the design
of new polymetallic structures and the application of these
scaffolds to the preparation of bis-uracils and bis-imidazoles
as examples of the versatility of these structures in organic
synthesis.
Therefore, no systematic differences were observed between
isostructural chromium and tungsten complexes toward this
process.
This coupling reaction was extended to other alkynylcar-
bene complexes. Thus, dialkynes 3 were obtained in good
yields by Sonogashira coupling of dibromo derivatives 4 with
trimethylsilylacetylene and further desilylation in the pres-
ence of base. The dialkynes 3 were monolithiated with
n-BuLi and reacted with Cr(CO)6, and finally, the “ate”
complex thus formed was reacted with Et3OBF4 to give
monocarbene complexes 1c,d in 35% and 20% yield,
respectively (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
First, assays to achieve the dimerization reaction were
effected on monocarbene 1a, which was prepared from 1,3-
diethynylbenzene following our previously reported proce-
dure.11,13 Reaction of complex 1a with an excess of CuCl-
TMEDA/air in acetone yielded after 90 min bis-carbene 2a
in good yield (60%).14 The same process with the tungsten
carbene 1b was also efficient. The reaction was completed
within 1 h, yielding carbene 2b in 55% yield (Scheme 1).
Monocarbenes 1c and 1d were reacted under standard Hay
conditions leading to the corresponding homocoupling
products 2c and 2d, which were isolated in 40% and 63%
yield, respectively (Scheme 3). The lower yield of carbene
2c is due to partial decomposition of the product during the
isolation procedure.
All of the coupling reactions tested yielded the desired
bis-carbenes exclusively. Products derived from transmeta-
lation to the metal carbene moiety process were not observed.
We have recently shown10b that transmetalation from chro-
(6) Aumann, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 17.
(7) (a) Macomber, D. W.; Madhukar, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992, 433,
279. (b) Macomber, D. W.; Hung, M.-H.; Verma, A. G.; Rogers, R. D.
Organometallics 1988, 7, 2072. (c) Macomber, D. W.; Hung, M.-H.;
Madhukar, P.; Liang, M.; Rogers, R. D. Organometallics 1991, 10, 737.
(d) Macomber, D. W.; Madhukar, P.; Rogers, R. D. Organometallics 1991,
10, 2121.
(8) (a) Wynn, T.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5034.
(b) Puntener, K.; Hellman, M. D.; Kuester, E.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 8301. (c) Kuester, E.; Hegedus, L. S. Organometallics 1999, 18,
5318. (d) Dumas, S.; Lastra, E.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 3368. (e) Hsiao, Y.; Hegedus, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3586.
(9) (a) Ram´ırez-Lo´pez, P.; Go´mez-Gallego, M.; Sierra, M. A.; Lejon,
T.; Manchen˜o, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3442. (b) Sierra, M.
A.; Mart´ınez-AÄ lvarez, R.; Go´mez-Gallego, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 736
and pertinent references therein.
(10) (a) Go´mez-Gallego, M.; Manchen˜o, M. J.; Sierra, M. A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2005, 38, 44. (b) Lo´pez-Alberca, M. P.; Manchen˜o, M. J.; Ferna´ndez,
I.; Go´mez-Gallego, M.; Sierra, M. A.; Torres, R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1757.
(11) (a) Ferna´ndez, I.; Manchen˜o, M. J.; Go´mez-Gallego, M.; Sierra,
M. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1237. (b) Ferna´ndez, I.; Sierra, M. A.; Manchen˜o,
M. J.; Go´mez-Gallego, M.; Ricart, S. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4304.
(12) Hay, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3320.
(13) (a) Llordes, A.; Sierra, M. A.; Lo´pez-Alberca, M. P.; Molins, E.;
Ricart, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 6096. (b) Della Sala, G.; Artillo,
A.; Ricart, S.; Spinella, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 1623. (c) Artillo,
A.; Della Salla, G.; De Santis, M.; Llordes, A.; Ricart, S.; Spinella, A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 1277.
(14) The synthesis of complex 2a is representative: The Hay catalyst
was prepared according to the literature (see ref 12). To the resulting catalyst
was added dropwise a solution of the monocarbene in dry acetone. The
mixture was stirred until the disappearance of monocarbene (checked by
TLC). The reaction was quenched with water and filtered to eliminate the
salts formed. The filtrate was extracted with diethyl ether. The combined
organic phases were washed with HCl (5%) and water, dried over MgSO4,
and filtered. The solvent was eliminated and purification by column
chromatography on silica gel afforded pure compound: 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ ) 7.71-7.43 (m, 8H), 4.77 (q, J ) 7.1 Hz, 4H), 1.60 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz,
6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ ) 313.7, 225.7, 216.1, 135.8, 135.0, 133.2, 129.2,
122.6, 121.7, 91.4, 80.5, 76.0, 75.0, 15.0; IR (CHCl3) ν 2062, 1954, 1217,
775 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C36H18O12Cr2: C, 57.92; H, 2.43. Found: C,
57.78; H, 2.21.
366
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008