methods developed,7,8 the rapid assembly of oxazole in a
[2 þ 2 þ 1] cycloaddition is the first example of efficient
intermolecular trapping of the highly electrophilic gold
carbene moiety (Scheme 1a).7c To extend the oxidation
strategy, we have developed approaches to the generation
of the related R-imino gold carbenes and thereafter new
reactions harvesting their reactivities.9,10 Among the nitrene-
transfer reagents employed, the azido group is deemed
ideal as an intramolecular variant due to its ease of in-
corporation and atom economy.9b,c,10 With respect to the
oxazole chemistry,7c we reasoned that a similar reaction via
the intermediacy of a corresponding R-imino gold carbene
would lend a facile access to imidazoles instead of oxazoles.
As shown in Scheme 1b, the reaction would commence with
a5-exo-dig cyclization of a tethered azido group onto a gold-
activated terminal alkyne, followed by the formation of the
R-imino gold carbene intermediate B upon dinitrogen ex-
pulsion; the assumed 5-exo selectivity is in line with related
precedents in gold catalysis.11 Notably, in our recent work,
an electronic bias of the CꢀC triple bond was necessary to
achieve the same regioselectivity for internal alkynes.9c The
carbene B, likely highly electrophlic, could then be trapped
by a nitrile to form a nitrile ylide-type intermediate C, which
can cyclize to yield a bicyclic imidazole.12 This imidazole
formation13 can be considered as an overall bimolecular [2 þ
2 þ 1] cycloaddition and a [3 þ 2] cycloaddition between a
nitrile and the carbene B. Herein, we disclose the successful
implementation of this design.
Our reaction discovery used 5-azidopent-1-yne (i.e., 1a)
as the substrate. It was readily synthesized from commercially
available pent-4-yn-1-ol in two steps.14 In anticipation of the
strongly electrophilic nature of B, as in the case of the oxazoles
synthesis, acetonitrile was used as solvent to achieve efficient
trapping of B. Table 1 shows the reaction discovery and
7d
optimization. When BrettPhosAuNTf2 was used as the
gold catalyst, the expected imidazole 3a was indeed formed,
albeit in only 11% yield. The undesired intramolecular
Huisgen reaction product,15 i.e., the triazole 4a (11%) and
the remaining substrate (76%) accounted for the mass
balance (entry 1). The slow reaction was expected and
consistent with the fact that the basic imidazole and triazole
Table 1. Initial Reaction Discovery and Condition
Optimizationa
yield of
entry
catalyst
conditions 3a:4a 3ac (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BrettPhosAuNTf2
BrettPhosAuNTf2
IPrAuNTf2
60 °C, 11 hb
60 °C, 11 h
60 °C, 11 h 2.4:1
1:1
11
38
68
48
41
88
93d
ꢀ
1:1.6
(C6F5)3PAuNTf2
(4-CF3Ph)3PAuNTf2
rt, 10 h
4.4:1
4.6:1
6.3:1
25:1
ꢀ
rt, 10 h
dichloropicolinatogold(III) rt, 10 h
AuCl3
rt, 10 h
Scheme 1. (a) Published Oxazole Synthesis and (b) Design for a
Related Imidazole Synthesis
no catalyst
60 °C, 11 h
a [1a] = 0.05 M. b No MsOH added. c Yields were determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy using CH2Br2 as the internal standard. d 89%
isolated yield.
formed can deactivate the gold catalyst via coordina-
tion.16 The addition of MsOH (1.1 equiv) avoided the
problem, and the reaction proceeded to completion in 11 h,
but the yield remained relatively low, and worse yet the
Huisgen reaction was dominant (entry 2). Screening different
gold catalysts proved to be fruitful. While IPrAuNTf2 at
60 °C led to improvement on both the chemoselectivity and
the reaction yield (entry 3), the more acidic (C6F5)3PAuNTf2
(entry 4) and (4-CF3Ph)3PAuNTf2 (entry 5) allowed the
reaction to proceed to completion in a reasonable time frame
at ambient temperature. Moreover, the chemoselectiv-
ities were further improved. The breakthrough came
when Au(III) catalysts (entries 6 and 7) were examined,
and the prototypical Au(III) salt, AuCl3 gave an excel-
lent yield of the bicyclic imidazole 3a while the amount
(9) (a) Li, C.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1738–1741. (b) Lu, B.;
Luo, Y.; Liu, L.; Ye, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 8358–8362. (c) Yan, Z.-Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 201210.1002/anie.201203678.
(10) For work done by other groups, see: (a) Wetzel, A.; Gagosz, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7354–7358. (b) Gorin, D. J.; Davis,
N. R.; Toste, F. D. 2005, 127, 11260-11261; (c) Hiroya, K.; Matsumoto,
S.; Ashikawa, M.; Ogiwara, K.; Sakamoto, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5349–
5352.
(11) (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Weyrauch, J. P.; Frey, W.; Bats, J. W. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 4391–4394. (b) Harkat, H.; Weibel, J. M.; Pale, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6273–6276. (c) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph,
M.; Schymura, S.; Visus, J.; Frey, W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4905–
4909. (d) Weyrauch, J. P.; Hashmi, A. S. K.; Schuster, A.; Hengst, T.;
Schetter, S.; Littmann, A.; Rudolph, M.; Hamzic, M.; Visus, J.;
Rominger, F.; Frey, W.; Bats, J. W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 956–963.
(12) Various gold catalyses have been run in acetonitrile without
solvent participation; for an example, see: Hashmi, A. S. K.; Frost,
T. M.; Bats, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11553. For an exception,
see: Ibrahim, N.; Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rominger, F. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2011, 353, 461.
(14) Saito, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Bag, S. S.; Ogasawara, S.; Fujimoto,
K.; Hanawa, K.; Saito, I. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3578–3588.
(15) Huisgen, R. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1961, 357–396.
(16) (a) Wang, D.; Gautam, L. N. S.; Bollinger, C.; Harris, A.; Li, M.;
Shi, X. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2618–2621. (b) Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Harris,
A.; Gautam, L. N. S.; Chen, Y.; Shi, X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353,
2584–2588. (c) Duan, H.; Sengupta, S.; Petersen, J. L.; Akhmedov,
N. G.; Shi, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12100–12102.
(13) For a recent gold-catalyzed case, see: Li, S.; Li, Z.; Yuan, Y.;
Peng, D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1130–1133.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4663