C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
of copolymer 2b shows a less developed morphology than the one
observed for 1a (Figure 3B). Although phase segregation is clearly
present in the morphology of 2b, a more rodlike structure was
observed with a diameter of 6 nm, but with much shorter lengths
(20-30 nm), indicating that the aspect ratio is significantly lower
than the aspect ratio observed for 1a.
Although dumbbell-shaped BTAs 1a,b appeared as elastic solids,
the material properties were not sufficient to allow tensile testing
to be performed. Gratifyingly, the elasticity in copolymers 2a,b
was more pronounced than the elasticity (qualitatively) observed
for 1a,b. Therefore, we performed tensile tests on 2b (see SI). The
stress-strain curve was typical for a thermoplastic elastomer. The
E-modulus was 3.4 ( 0.2 MPa, indicative for a soft rubber. The
yield stress and the strain at break were 1.42 ( 0.07 MPa and 497
( 43%, respectively. These values compare well with those of Upy-
urea functionalized PEB,8 poly(urea EB)12 analogues, and bis-urea
grafted poly(dimethylsiloxane).6
Figure 2. Amine telechelic PEB before (left) and after (right, compound
1b) functionalization with a BTA moiety.
In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that telechelic
polymers end-capped or copolymerized with BTA’s lead to
supramolecular materials. The intrinsic phase segregation of BTA
nanorods with an amorphous polymer such as PEB results in
thermoplastic elastomeric behavior. Our current research is devoted
to apply this principle to other classes of polymers and to
incorporate functional BTAs into the columnar aggregates.
Figure 3. AFM phase image of (A) 1a and (B) 2b. The scale bar is
100 nm.
the beam, and no linear dichroism effects were present. This
suggests that the columnar helical order present in 3 in solution is
retained in 1a and 2a.
Acknowledgment. Ph.L. is “chercheur qualifie´” from FNRS
(Belgium). The work of J.R. forms part of the research programme
of the Dutch Polymer Institute project #475. NWO is acknowledged
for funding.
The physical properties of dumbbell-shaped BTAs 1 and
copolymers 2 were then studied in the solid state. While amine
telechelic PEB is a liquid at room temperature, 1a,b and 2a,b were
obtained as transparent, elastic solids. As an example, the dramatic
visual change in properties of PEB and BTA end-capped PEB
(compound 1b) is shown in Figure 2. Differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) of 1a showed a Tg at -60 °C and a small
transition around 195-215 °C (∆H ) 2.63 J/g for 1a and ∆H )
2.79 J/g for 1b). With polarization optical microscopy (POM), we
observed a mobile, birefringent texture typical for a nematic phase
starting from 60 °C up to the clearing temperature around 200 °C.
Infrared (IR) spectra in the solid state of 1a,b showed vibrations at
positions typical for amides involved in three-fold R-helical-type
hydrogen bonding as evidenced by comparison with compound 3
(ν(NH) ) 3240 cm-1, ν(CdO) ) 1642 cm-1 and ν(C-N) ) 1562
cm-1 for 1a,b and (νNH) ) 3226 cm-1, ν(CdO) ) 1637 cm-1
and ν(C-N) ) 1563 cm-1 for 3). Variable-temperature IR (see
SI) revealed a gradual shifting of the characteristic vibrations
starting from 75 °C and allowed us to attribute the transition around
200 °C to the loss of the intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The NH,
CdO, and C-N vibrations in the IR spectra of the copolymers
2a,b were at similar positions as observed for dumbbell-shaped
compounds 1a,b and typical of intermolecularly hydrogen-bonded
amides. DSC traces for the copolymers 2a,b revealed a Tg at -57
°C and a small transition at around 185 °C (∆H ) 1.87 J/g for 2a
and 2.12 J/g for 2b). In this case, no liquid crystalline phase was
observed with POM.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
analysis of 1-3, tensile data, AFM images of 1b, variable temperature
IR, UV, and CD spectra. This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem.
ReV. 2001, 101, 4071.
(2) Bosman, A. W.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer,
E. W. Macromol. Symp. 2003, 201, 143.
(3) Ciferri, A. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 511.
(4) Sivakova, S.; Bohnsack, D. A.; Mackay, M. E.; Suwanmala, P.; Rowan,
S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18202.
(5) Hilger, C.; Stadler, R. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 2095.
(6) Colombani, O.; Barioz, C.; Bouteiller, L.; Chaneac, C.; Fomperie, L.;
Lortie, F.; Montes, H. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1752.
(7) Kautz, H.; van Beek, D. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W.
Macromolecules 2006, 39, 4265.
(8) Wisse, E.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Appel, W. J. P.; van der Bruggen, R. L. J.;
Paulusse, J. M. J.; de Greef, T. F. A.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Mezari, B.;
Magusin, P. C. M. M.; Meijer, E. W. Nat. Mater. 2008. Submitted.
(9) The BTA unit has been applied in thermotropic liquid crystals, in
organogelators, as a nucleating agent for iPP, and to improve the electric
properties of iPP. See: (a) Matsunaga, Y.; Miyajima, N.; Nakayasu, Y.;
Sakai, S.; Yonenaga, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61, 207. (b)
Hanabusa, K.; Koto, C.; Kimura, M.; Shirai, H.; Kakehi, A. Chem. Lett.
1997, 5, 429. (c) Yasuda, Y.; Iishi, E.; Inada, H.; Shirota, Y. Chem. Lett.
1996, 7, 575. (d) Sakamoto, A.; Ogata, D.; Shikata, T.; Hanabusa, K.
Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8983. (e) Shikata, T.; Ogata, D.; Hanabusa,
K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 508. (f) de Loos, M.; van Esch, J. H.;
Kellogg, R. M.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7285. (g)
Blomenhofer, M.; Ganzleben, S.; Hanft, D.; Schmidt, H.-W.; Kristiansen,
M.; Smith, P.; Stoll, K.; Maeder, D.; Hoffmann, K. Macromolecules 2005,
38, 3688. (h) Mohmeyer, N.; Behrendt, N.; Zhang, X.; Smith, P.; Altsta¨dt,
V.; Sessler, G. M.; Schmidt, H.-W. Polymer 2007, 48, 1612.
(10) Lightfoot, M. P.; Mair, F. S.; Pritchard, R. G.; Warren, J. E. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 1945.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of compound 1a displayed a
fibrillar structure which is indicative for phase segregation between
the PEB soft phase and the BTA columnar aggregates (Figure 3A).
The diameter of the fibrils was estimated around 6 nm and their
length at 500-800 nm. This suggests that nanorods indeed are
present in the soft polymer matrix. The morphology is reminiscent
of the morphologies previously observed for Upy-urea modified
PEB, although the dimensions are smaller in the case of 1a.7 AFM
(11) (a) Brunsveld, L.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Broeren, M. A. C.; Janssen, H.
M.; Vekemans, J. A. J. M.; Meijer, E. W. Chem. Lett. 2000, 292. (b)
Smulders, M. J. M.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130. In press.
(12) Klinedinst, D. B.; Yilgo¨r, E.; Yilgo¨r, I.; Beyer, F. L.; Wilkes, G. L. Polymer
2005, 46, 10191.
JA0774764
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 4, 2008 1121