Scheme 1. Preparation of Optically Enriched Branched Allyl
Benzyl Imidodicarboxylates
Figure 2. Ir(I)-catalyzed stereospecific decarboxylative allylic
amidation reaction of optically enriched branched benzyl allyl
imidodicarboxylates.
conversion of the resulting optically enriched allylic alcohols
13 and their acetates 14 to the corresponding benzyl
imidodicarboxylates 7 and ent-7, respectively (see the
Supporting Information [SI] for details).
can provide not only 4 and 6 but also the decarboxylative
allylic amidation products that could not be easily accessed
by the Ir(I)-catalyzed regio- and enantioselective decarboxyl-
ative allylic amidation of 1.
The Ir(I)-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic amidation reac-
tions of 7 and ent-7 were conducted under the determined
conditions involving [Ir(COD)Cl]2, a chiral phosphoramidite
ligand L*, and DBU in THF,6 and the results are depicted
in Table 1. The stereospecific decarboxylative allylic ami-
dation appears to be quite general, accommodating a wide
range of R groups such as aryl (entries 1 and 2), benzyl (entry
3), oxygen atom functionalized at the R-carbon (entries 4-6),
oxygen atom functionalized at the â-carbon (entry 7),
cyclohexyl (entry 8), and cyclohexenyl (entries 9 and 10).
At the outset, racemic benzyl 1-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-
oxy)-but-3-ene-2-yl imidodicarboxylate (rac-9) was prepared
(see below), and subjected to the reaction conditions involv-
ing [Ir(COD)Cl]2, a chiral phosphoramidite ligand L*, DBU,
and proton sponge (PS) in THF. Racemic 2-N-benzyloxy-
carbonylamino-1-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-but-3-ene (rac-
10) was obtained in excellent reaction yield and regioselec-
tivity (eq 3). Further experiments revealed that PS was not
required for the reaction. These results indicate that the
optically enriched chiral benzyl allyl imidodicarboxylates 7
should lead to the corresponding optically enriched allylic
amidation products 8 with complete retention of configura-
tion under the above conditions, because (1) Ir(I)-catalyzed
allylic alkylation followed a double inversion mechanism
through the Ir-π-allyl intermediates, and the interconversion
between the Ir-π-allyl intermediates was slow relative to the
other catalytic steps (see Figure 2)3,4 and (2) the branched
allylic acetates and carbonates were better (with respect to
regioselectivity) and faster substrates than their linear
counterparts in the Ir(I)-catalyzed allylic substitution reac-
tions.3,5
Except for entries 1 and 2, all other allylic amidation
products in entries 3-10 either were not possible to obtain
or were obtained with modest regio- and enantioselectivities
from the corresponding decarboxylative allylic amidation
reactions of 1. The data from Table 1 also show that the
optical purities of the allylic substrates were completely
translated into those of the allylic amidation products with
retention of configuration, as expected from the double
inversion mechanism and the slow interconversion between
the Ir-π-allyl intermediates. The presence of an additional
adjacent chiral center did not interfere with chirality transfer
(entries 9 and 10). Such complete chirality transfer in the
Ir(I)-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic amidation of 7 and
ent-7 is in sharp contrast to the corresponding Ir(I)-catalyzed
stereospecific allylic alkylation, where considerable erosion
in chirality transfer took place.3b
With such a premise, a variety of optically enriched benzyl
allyl imidodicarboxylates 7 and their enantiomers ent-7 were
prepared from the corresponding aldehydes 11 in three or
four steps according to the general procedure shown in
Scheme 1.1,3a 7 and ent-7 were obtained by the enzymatic
resolution of the racemic allylic alcohols 12 followed by the
To ascertain the absolute stereochemistry at the allylic
carbon of the amidation products and to determine the ee of
the amidation product in entry 3, the amidationproduct 15
was transformed to N-Cbz protected L-phenylalanine by the
oxidative cleavage of the terminal double bond.7 The optical
rotation of the resulting product matched that in the literature
(Scheme 2).8
(1) Singh, O. V.; Han, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 774-775.
(2) For general reviews for the decarboxylative allylations: (a) Tunge,
J. A.; Burger, E. C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1715-1726. (b) Tsuji, J.
Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 2004, 80, 349-358. For more recent references
on the decarboxylative allylic C-N bond-forming reactions: (c) Wang,
C.; Tunge, J. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3211-3214. (d) Mellegaard-Waetzig,
S. R.; Rayabarapu, D. K.; Tunge, J. A. Synlett 2005, 2759-2762.
(3) (a) Bartels, B.; Garcia-Yebra, C.; Rominger, F.; Helmchen, G. Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 2569-2586. (b) Bartels, B.; Helmchen, G. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 741-742.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of N-Cbz-Protected L-Phenylalanine
(4) For recent reviews on the Ir(I)-catalyzed allylations: (a) Helmchen,
G.; Dahuz, A.; Dubon, P.; Schelwies, M.; Weihofen, R. Chem. Commun.
2007, 675-691. (b) Takeuchi, R.; Kezuka, S. Synthesis 2006, 3349-3366.
(c) Miyabe, H.; Takemoto, Y. Synlett 2005, 1641-1655.
(5) Polet, D.; Alexakis, A.; Tissot-Croset, K.; Corminboeuf, C.; Ditrich,
K. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3596-3609.
4802
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 23, 2007