622
S. Ghidouche et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 619–623
[2Mꢀ2H+O]. Careful examination of the MS spectra of
compounds at m/z 604 (14) and 618 (15), obtained from
4 and 5, respectively, however reflected structural differ-
ences between these two compounds (we were not able to
isolate dimeric compound at m/z 586). Indeed, when the
spectrum of 15 seemed to be compatible with the formation
of either a carbon–carbon or a carbon–oxygen single bond
between the two monomeric subunits (and re-oxidation of
one of the subunit), formation of 14 is clearly only compat-
ible with the formation of an ether linkage between two
subunits. This assumption is supported by the observation
in the MS spectrum of 14 of a major fragment at m/z 302
also observed in compounds 10a,b, as a result of the easy
cleavage of the OR bond after the loss of an H2O molecule.
On the other hand, MS spectrum of 15 mainly revealed
classical fragmentations of the flavan skeleton.
Moreover, to allow incorporation of a H2O molecule
and a further oxygen atom, according to the molecular
weight of 14, the ‘upper’ subunit needs to be further oxi-
dized; the most satisfactory structure hypothesis for 14 is
therefore shown in Figure 1, involving the OH at C-40 in
the ether linkage between both subunits rather than the
OH at C-3 as in 16.
oxidation of phenolic species are of great importance and
will help in a better understanding of the biosynthesis of
phenolic oligomers and polymers in plants.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank L. Kerhoas (Inra) for LC–MS
measurements.
References and notes
1. Doe, J. S.; Smith, J. J.; Roe, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 8234–
8238.
2. Fenoll, L. G.; Garcia-Ruiz, P. A.; Varon, R.; Garcia-Canovas, F.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7781–7787.
´
3. Es-Safi, N.-E.; Le Guerneve, C.; Kerhoas, L.; Ducrot, P.-H. Tetra-
hedron 2006, 62, 2705–2714.
´
4. Beauhaire, J.; Es-Safi, N.-E.; Boyer, F. D.; Kerhoas, L.; Le Guerneve,
C.; Ducrot, P.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 559–562.
5. Boyer, F. D.; Ducrot, P.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5177–5180.
6. Es-Safi, N.-E.; Ducrot, P.-H. Lett. Org. Chem. 2006, 3, 231–234.
´
7. Boyer, F. D.; Es-Safi, N.-E.; Beauhaire, J.; Le Guerneve, C.; Ducrot,
P.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 563–566.
8. Boyer, F. D.; Beauhaire, J.; Martin, M.-T.; Ducrot, P.-H. Synthesis
2006, 3250–3260.
9. Claus, H. Micron 2004, 35, 93–96.
This discrepancy observed in the formation of 14 and 16
could be the consequence of a competition during the dis-
mutation process, due, in the case of 4, to the presence of
the hydroxy group at C-40, between p-stacking, dipole–
dipole and steric interactions leading a different spatial
arrangement of both subunits in the transition state than
that observed with 3. The hypothetical structure of 14,
however supports the hypothesis of a dismutation process
rather than radical–radical coupling, since we did not have
observed, in any cases, products resulting from a possible
phenoxy radical formation.
10. Riva, S. Trends in Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 219–226.
11. Dehon, L.; Machex, J. J.; Durand, M. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 303–311.
12. Lopez-Serrano, M.; Barcelo, A. R. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50,
1218–1224.
13. Guyot, S.; Vercauteren, J.; Cheynier, V. Phytochemistry 1996, 42,
1279–1288.
14. Enguita, F. J.; Marßcal, D.; Martins, L. O.; Grenha, R.; Henriquest, A.
O.; Lindley, P. F.; Garrondo, M. A. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 23472–
23476. and references cited therein.
15. Bertrand, T.; Jolivalt, C.; Briozzo, P.; Caminade, E.; Joly, N.;
Madzak, C.; Mougin, C. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 7325–7333.
16. Kollmann, A.; Boyer, F.-D.; Ducrot, P.-H.; Kerhoas, L.; Jolivalt, C.;
Touton, I.; Einhorn, J.; Mougin, C. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 2005,
68, 251–258.
A last interesting result is this obtained in the oxidation
of quercetin 3-O-glucoside 6. Indeed, even if the oxidation
seemed to proceed very slowly, this compound, albeit
exhibiting a protected hydroxy group at C-3, was partially
oxidized and the major oxidation product (m/z 908) did not
resulted from a loss of the glycosidic moiety. The fact that
under the same conditions, luteolin 2 remained untouched
may indicates that electro donating abilities of the oxygen
atom at C-3 is sufficient to promote oxidation at C-2.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated the enzymatic oxi-
dation of flavonols to be first promoted by the formation of
the radical on the oxygen at C-3 through H abstraction
even in the presence of phenolic hydroxy groups on the B
ring. We have also demonstrated that most of the sub-
sequent reactions either with solvent (water or alcohols)
or with another substrate molecule were initiated by a
dismutation reaction of two radicals, leading to the forma-
tion of a carbocation at C-2 that was thereafter quenched
by a protic species. Therefore, intermolecular interactions
are crucial factors for the reaction issue: increasing
unfavourable interactions would allow radical isomeriza-
tion and the formation of dimers with a diphenyl ether
link. These evidences for carbocation formation during
17. Ghidouche, S.; Ducrot, P.-H. unpublished results: incubating com-
pounds 1–6 in the presence of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds from a
mutant strain in which biosynthesis of flavonoids was silenced18
afforded qualitatively the same pattern of oxidation products as
described in this study. On the other hand, the use of Arabidopsis
thaliana seeds from mutant strains in which no laccase activity is
detected gave no oxidation products, allowing us to assume the
importance of the laccases in the oxidation of flavonoids.
18. Pourcel, L.; Routaboul, J.-M.; Kerhoas, L.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec,
L. The Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2966–2980.
19. Van Acker, S. A. B. E.; De Groot, M. J.; Van den Berg, D. J.; Tromp,
M. N. J. L.; Den Kelder, G. D. O.; Van der Vijgh, W. J. F. Chem. Res.
Toxicol. 1996, 9, 1305–1312.
20. Rice-Evans, C. A.; Miller, N. J.; Paganga, G. Free Radical Biol. Med.
1996, 20, 933–956.
21. Typical procedure: A flavonol solution in methanol, ethanol or
acetonitrile (10 ml, 10 mg/ml) and 60 ml citrate/phosphate buffer
0.1 M was incubated with 30 ml of laccase (purchased from Fluka;
23.3 U/mg) solution (2 U/ml) at pH 4 and 30 °C for 2 h with stirring,
to allow oxygen dissolution in the reaction medium. Control reactions
were also made in the absence of enzyme to ensure the products
arising from enzymatic oxidations not being artefacts resulting from
autooxidation processes. The suspension was centrifuged at 6000 rpm
for 10 min; the supernatant was then filtered under vacuum through
an ultra filtration membrane, £ 44.5 mm (Millipore). The filtrate was
concentrated by evaporation. The oxidation products were separated