March 2008
271
concentrated to produce an n-BuOH layer supernatant (BLS) fraction pletely removed. The resulting aqueous solution was applied to a Sephadex
(18.7 g). These fractions were fractionated separately into three fractions LH-20 column (26ꢄ4.5 cm i.d.) with 0—100% MeOH (10% stepwise elu-
using Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (50—100% MeOH and tion, each 300 ml) and 50% aqueous acetone to yield 7 fractions. Fr. 1 (15.9
then 50% aqueous acetone) to produce fractions BLP-1 (13.5 g, yield:
32.5%), BLP-2 (10.5 g, 25.3%) and BLP-3 (7.7 g, 18.4%) from BLP, and
BLS-1 (9.6 g, 51%), BLS-2 (7.8 g, 41.6%) and BLS-3 (1.4 g, 7.4%) from
BLS. HPLC analysis demonstrated that BLP-1 and BLS-1 contained caf-
mg) and Fr. 4 (172 mg) were identified as epicatechin and 2, respectively,
using TLC and HPLC comparisons. MALDI-TOF-MS of Fr. 5 showed peaks
at m/z 875 (10, [MꢃNa]ꢃ), 1285 (corresponding to a trimer 11, [MꢃNa]ꢃ),
and Fr. 7 exhibited the peaks at m/z 1740 (tetramer) and 2175 (pentamer). Fr.
feine and small amounts of polymer-like oxidation products (POPs), BLP-2 6 (266 mg) contained polymeric substances and was further separated using
and BLS-2 contained POPs and small amounts of mono- and di-galloyl
esters of theaflavin, and BLP-3 and BLS-3 contained only POPs. BLP-3 was
a Sephadex LH-20 column (20ꢄ1.5 cm i.d.) with 8 M urea in 60% acetone
(adjusted to pH 2 by conc. HCl). Tubes containing polymeric substance and
obtained as a dark-brown amorphous powder with the following elemental 10 were collected separately and concentrated by evaporation until the ace-
constituents: C, 58.38%; H, 4.44%; N, 0.30%. tone was removed. The resulting aqueous solutions were applied separately
Size-Exclusion HPLC of BLP-3 and BLS-3 Size-exclusion HPLC of to a MCI-gel CHP 20P column (20ꢄ3.0 cm i.d.). After washing the column
BLP-3 and BLS-3 (Fig. 4B) was performed according to Yanagida et al.19) with water to remove urea, the polyphenols were eluted with H2O–MeOH
using a TSK gel a-2500 column (300ꢄ7.8 mm i.d.). The mobile phase was (10% stepwise elution from 0 to 60%, each 100 ml) to produce the poly-
acetone–6 M urea (pH 2) (3 : 2), the flow rate was 0.1 ml/min, and the eluate
was monitored at 220 nm.
meric substance (45.1 mg) and 10 (28.5 mg).
Thiolysis of Polymer-Like Substance A solution of 0.1% (w/v) POPs
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Mr. K. Inada and Mr. N.
in 70% EtOH (0.2 ml) was mixed with 5% mercaptoethanol in 60% EtOH Yamaguchi for NMR and MS measurements. This work was supported by a
containing 0.1% HCl (0.8 ml) and heated at 70 °C for 7 h. HPLC analysis Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 18510189 from the Japan Society
showed four small peaks. The retention time and UV absorption of the peaks for the Promotion of Science.
coincided with those of epicatechin, catechin-4-hydroxyethylthioether, epi-
catechin 4-hydroxyethylthioether and epicatechin-3-O-gallate, and repre- References
sents the order of their elution.23) However, the broad hump on the base-line
did not decrease.
1) Hashimoto F., Nonaka, G., Nishioka, I., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 40,
1383—1389 (1992).
GPC Analysis of POPs POPs were dissolved in dimethylformamide
and applied to a TSK-gel a3000 column (300ꢄ7.8 mm i.d.) at 40 °C with
dimethylformamide containing 10 mM LiCl as the elution solvent at a flow
rate of 0.5 ml/min. The peaks were detected by monitoring UV absorption at
254 nm. Polystyrene standards (molecular weights of 4000, 25000, 50000
and 170000), toluene (molecular weight 92), and three ellagitannins [1-O-
galloylpedunculagin (MW 936),38,39) sanguiin H-6 (MW 1870),40) and
rubusuaviin C (MW 2804)39)] were used as standards. Peak-top molecular
weights were recorded by an Integrator 807-IT (JASCO Corporation).
Ethanolysis of BLP-3 and BLS-3 BLP-3 and BLS-3 were dissolved
separately in 1 M HCl in EtOH (2 mg/ml) and heated at 100 °C. The concen-
tration of ethyl gallate in the reaction mixture was analyzed by HPLC at 12,
24, 36, 48 and 60 h. The peak area did not increase after 48 h. The yields of
ethyl gallate from BLP-3 and BLS-3 were 7.1ꢁ0.1% (5.5ꢁ0.1% as galloyl
group) and 9.1ꢁ0.1% (7.0ꢁ0.1%), respectively. The calibration curve was
2) Wang D., Kurasawa E., Yamaguchi Y., Kubota K., Kobayashi A., J.
Agric. Food Chem., 49, 1900—1903 (2001).
3) Takino Y., Imagawa H., Horikawa H., Tanaka A., Agric. Biol. Chem.,
28, 64—71 (1964).
4) Nonaka G., Kawahara O., Nishioka I., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31, 3906—
3914 (1983).
5) Hashimoto F., Nonaka G., Nishioka I., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 36,
1676—1684 (1988).
6) Haslam E., Phytochemistry, 64, 61—73 (2003).
7) Luczaj W., Skrzydlewska E., Preventive Medicine 40, 910—918
(2005).
8) Way T.-Z., Lee H.-H., Kao M.-C., Lin J.-K., Eur. J. Cancer, 40,
2165—2174 (2004).
9) Krishnan R., Maru G. B., J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 4261—4269
(2004).
constructed using ethyl gallate prepared by a similar ethanolysis of tannic 10) Maity S., Ukil A., Karmakar A., Datta N., Chaudhuri T., Vedasiromoni
acid. Preparation of the standard ethyl gallate was as follows: tannic acid
was heated in 1 M HCl in EtOH under reflux for 12 h. After solvent partition-
J. R., Ganguly D. K., Das P. K., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 470, 103—112
(2003).
ing between EtOAc and water, the EtOAc layer was applied to a Sephadex 11) Sang S., Lambert J. D., Tian S., Hong J., Hou Z., Ryu J.-H., Stark R.
LH-20 column with EtOH and further purified using silica gel 60 (CHCl3–
MeOH–H2O, 90 : 10 : 1, v/v/v) chromatography and crystallized from CHCl3–
MeOH.
E., Rosen R. T., Huang M.-T., Yang C. S., Ho C.-T., Bioorg. Med.
Chem., 12, 459—467 (2004).
12) Mulder T. P. J., van Platerink C. J., Wijnand Schuyl P. J., van
Amelsvoort J. M. M., J. Chromatogr. B, 760, 271—279 (2001).
Production of POPs Using
a Model Fermentation Experiment
Japanese pear fruit (600 g) was homogenized with water (100 ml) in a me- 13) Haslam E., “Practical Polyphenolics, from Structure to Molecular
chanical blender and filtered through four layers of gauze. The homogenate
(300 ml) was mixed with an aqueous solution (200 ml) containing (ꢀ)-epi-
catechin (0.5 g), (ꢀ)-epigallocatechin (1.0 g), (ꢀ)-epicatechin-3-O-gallate (0.5
g) and (ꢀ)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (2.5 g) and stirred vigorously for
Recognition and Physiological Action,” Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1988, pp. 138—177.
14) Zhang Y.-J., Tanaka T., Betsumiya Y., Kusano R., Matsuo A., Ueda T.,
Kouno I., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 50, 258—262 (2002).
3 h. The mixture was heated at 90 °C for 2 min to inactivate enzymes and 15) Inokuchi J., Okabe H., Yamaichi T., Nagamatsu A., Nonaka G., Nishi-
decompose unstable quinone intermediates.22,41) After cooling, the mixture
was poured into acetone (2 l) and filtered through No. 2 filter paper. The fil-
oka I., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 33, 264—269 (1985).
16) Hara Y., Honda M., Agric. Biol. Chem., 54, 1939—1945 (1990).
trate was concentrated until the organic solvent was removed, and the result- 17) Matsui T., Tanaka T., Tamura S., Toshima A., Tamaya K., Miyata Y.,
ing aqueous solution (400 ml) was successively partitioned with EtOAc Tanaka K., Matsumoto K., J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 99—105 (2007).
(400 mlꢄ4) and n-BuOH (300 mlꢄ4). The n-BuOH layer was concentrated 18) Nakai M., Fukui Y., Asami A., Toyoda-Ono Y., Iwashita T., Shibata
in vacuo and the residue was fractionated by size-exclusion chromatography
using Sephadex LH-20 (26ꢄ1.5 cm i.d.) with acetone: 6 M urea (3 : 2, v/v,
H., Mitsunaga T., Hashimoto F., Kiso Y., J. Agric. Food Chem., 53,
4593—4598 (2005).
adjusted to pH 2 with diluted HCl).19) The POPs with larger molecular 19) Yanagida A., Shoji T., Shibusawa Y., J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods,
weights were eluted faster than catechins and theaflavins, and the fractions
containing only POPs were combined. After evaporation of acetone, the 20) Fujiwara T., Nakagawa-Izumi A., Osawa T., Numata O., Biosci.
aqueous solution was passed through Sephadex LH-20 (12ꢄ1.5 cm i.d.) and Biotechnol. Biochem., 71, 711—719 (2007).
washed with water to remove urea and HCl. The POPs adsorbed on the gel 21) Piccinelli A. L., Simone F., Passi S., Rastrelli L., J. Agric. Food Chem.,
were eluted using 50% aqueous acetone to give POPs (70 mg). 52, 5863—5868 (2004).
Enzymatic Oxidation of 2 Japanese pear (150 g) was homogenized in 22) Tanaka T., Watarumi S., Matsuo Y., Kamei M., Kouno I., Tetrahedron,
56, 311—322 (2003).
H2O (150 ml) and filtered through four layers of gauze. The homogenate
(300 ml) was mixed with an aqueous solution of 2 (1.0 g in 200 ml) and vig-
orously stirred for 4 h at room temperature. The reaction was monitored by
59, 7939—7947 (2003).
23) Tanaka T., Takahashi R., Kouno I., Nonaka G., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1, 1944, 3013—3022 (1994).
reversed-phase HPLC. The mixture was poured into acetone (2 l), gently 24) Tanaka T., Inoue K., Betsumiya Y., Mine C., Kouno I., J. Agric. Food
stirred for 30 min, and the insoluble material was then removed by filtration. Chem., 49, 5785—5789 (2001).
The filtrate was concentrated by evaporation until the acetone was com- 25) Wan X., Nursten H. E., Cai Y., Davis A. L., Wilkins J. P. G., Davies A.