A R T I C L E S
Weiss et al.
Chart 2. Quinolones 33 and 34 and Thiochromone 35
though). With respect to aromatic carboxylic acid derivatives,
nucleophilic heteroatoms (like N) within the aromatic could lead
to unwanted intramolecular reactions. In addition, strongly
electron-donating groups or strongly electron-withdrawing sub-
stituents at the aromatic should be avoided, as they might lead
to Friedel-Crafts-like reactions with DMAD or might create
further centers for nucleophilic attack (respectively). An NOV-
like reactivity of alkenes 1 instead of DMAD could not be
provoked.
Further investigations into NOV will very likely reveal more
applications of this method and will equally likely develop a
more precise idea of its limitations.
nucleophile. Unfortunately, methyl 3-(trimethylsilyl)propiolate
(Z ) TMS) did not undergo any vinylonio reaction.
Yet, as the decarboxylation of quinolones of type 32 at C2
is known from the literature to be simple and highly effective,12
the above-mentioned method provides a novel synthetic ap-
proach to modern fluoroquinolone antibiotics (which bear a
hydrogen substituent at C2 as well as a carboxy group at C3).
These constitute the most important class of antiobiotics used
today, curing a wide variety of diseases.13 In comparison to the
currently used syntheses for fluoroquinolones, namely, the
Gould-Jacobs14 and especially the Grohe15 method, the syn-
thetic route introduced above features some distinctive advan-
tages: in addition to the mild reaction conditions, the one-pot
approach, and the favorable “atom economy”, it should be
possible to introduce very weakly nucleophilic amines at 11/
Cl, due to the strong electrostatic activation by the onio ligand
(which is also a much better leaving group compared to alkoxy
or dimethylamino substituents employed by the established
Grohe method15). Hence, in addition to the advantages, our
method has the potential to increase the range of accessible
fluoroquinolones (especially those with weakly nucleophilic
amines introduced at N1 and those bearing a substituent at C2
that can be derived from a carboxymethyl group), thus enabling
the development and testing of prospective structures for novel
antibiotics.
Experimental Section
Unless otherwise stated, all manipulations were performed under
an inert atmosphere of nitrogen via standard Schlenk techniques. Dry
solvents were employed throughout.
1,2,2-Tri(methoxycarbonyl)ethenyltriphenylphosphonio triflate
(9). The employed compound 7 was prepared in situ by addition of
1.404 g (5.35 mmol) triphenylphosphine to a solution of 0.39 mL (5.07
mmol) of methyl chloroformate and 0.92 mL (5.09 mmol) (trimethyl-
silyl)trifluoromethanesulfonate in CH2Cl2 at room temperature. On
addition of 0.62 mL (5.07 mmol) of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate,
the color of the solution turns to orange and considerable heat develops.
The product 9 precipitates on addition of Et2O. It is filtered and washed
with a mixture of CH2Cl2 and Et2O 1:1. Yield: 2.330 g (75%) colorless
powder. M (C27H24F3O9PS) ) 612.52. FAB-MS: 463 (9 - OTf-). IR
(KBr): 2959 (w), 1742 (s), 1439 (m), 1265 (br, vs), 1170 (w), 1104
(m), 1030 (m), 1011 (w), 900 (w), 863 (w), 755 (w), 723 (w), 691 (w),
637 (m), 572 (w), 517 (m). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 7.72 (m, 15H), 3.85 (s,
3H, OMe), 3.37 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.08 (s, 3H, OMe). 13C NMR (CDCl3):
161.77 (d, CO), 160.85 (d, CO), 160.28 (d, CO), 144.20, 136.12, 134.09,
1
131.79, 130.44, 120.72 [q, J(C-F) ) -321 Hz, CF3SO3-], 114.84,
54.49 (s, OMe), 54.11 (s, OMe), 53.78 (s, OMe). Anal. C27H24F3O9PS:
calcd C 52.95, H 3.95, S 5.23; found C 52.60, H 4.36, S 5.19.
Dimethyl 1,5-Diphenylpyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylate (30). A solution
of 639 mg (1.23 mmol) of (Z)-N-[2-benzoyl-1,2-di(methoxycarbonyl)-
ethenyl]-4-dimethylaminopyridinio triflate 10Z in 15 mL of CH2Cl2 is
treated with 0.12 mL (1.21 mmol) of phenylhydrazine at room
temperature. After 15 h the solvent was removed and the product was
isolated by column chromatography (mobile phase, hexane/ethyl acetate
1:1). Yield: 204 mg (49%) yellow crystals. M (C19H16N2O4) ) 336.34.
FAB-MS: 337 (30 + H+), 305 (30 - MeO-). IR (KBr): 1723 (m),
1500 (w), 1401 (br, vs), 1330 (w), 1317 (w), 1261 (w), 1225 (m), 1079
(m), 969 (w), 792 (w), 762 (w), 696 (w). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 7.34 (m,
br, 10H, Ar), 3.93 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.72 (s, 3H, OMe). 13C NMR
(CDCl3): 163.32, 162.14, 144.68, 143.00, 138.41, 129.87, 129.37,
128.82, 128.47, 128.22, 127.61, 125.45, 115.38, 52.48, 52.10. Anal.
C19H16N2O4: calcd C 67.85, H 4.79, N 8.33; found C 67.51, H 4.78,
N 8.17.
Dimethyl 4-Oxo-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydroquinoline-2,3-dicarboxylate
(32; R1 ) R2 ) H, Z ) CO2Me). (a) From 26 (R1 ) R2 ) H, Z )
CO2Me), by use of base (n-BuLi): A solution of 533 mg (1.49 mmol)
of 26 in 20 mL of CH2Cl2 was cooled to -78 °C and treated with 1.05
mL of a 1.6 M solution of n-butyllithium in hexanes (corresponding to
1.68 mmol of butyllithium). After being stirred for 60 min, the solution
was warmed to room temperature and stirred for another 15 min. The
solution was treated with 40 mL of H2O, and the layers were separated.
The organic layer was washed another three times with 40 mL of H2O
and dried over MgSO4. After removal of the solvent, the product was
isolated by column chromatography (mobile phase hexane/ethyl acetate
2:1, slowly more polar). Yield: 348 mg (69%), white powder. M
(C19H15NO5) ) 337.33. FAB-MS: 338 (32 + H+). IR (KBr): 3052
(w), 2954 (w), 1744 (s), 1714 (s), 1631 (s), 1604 (s), 1536 (m), 1492
(m), 1468 (s), 1436 (m), 1330 (m), 1297 (s), 1275 (m), 1225 (s), 1174
Conclusion
Nucleophilic â-oniovinylation (NOV), as presented in this
paper, constitutes a novel synthetic method for the preparation
of (formerly almost unknown) â-onio-activated Michael systems.
The products are obtained under mild conditions from onio
derivatives of carboxylic acids, DMAD, and catalytic amounts
of either DMAP or PPh3, making use of the alkyne’s implicit
d2-reactivity. As the products are highly functionalized, they
are themselves the starting points for further subsequent
reactions and syntheses. A few first examples were presented
in this paper, namely, the synthesis of pyrazoles and quinolones,
and a wide array of heterocycles may be accessible via this route.
During our investigations we also came upon some limitations
of NOV. With regard to aliphatic carboxylic acid derivatives
as substrates, acetic acid chloride (as well as trichloroacetic acid
chloride) proved to be incompatible with NOV, as a proton (or
chloro substituent) at the R carbon was attacked by the
composite nucleophile (methoxyacetic acid was compatible,
(12) Biere, H.; Seelen, W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1976, 1972-1981.
(13) (a) Crumplin, G. C., Ed. The 4-quinolones; Springer-Verlag, London, 1990.
(b) Shah, P. M. Pharm. i. u. Z. 2001, 5, 394-398. (c) Grohe, K. J. Prakt.
Chem. 1993, 335, 397-409.
(14) (a) Gould, R. G.; Jacobs, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 2890-2895.
(b) Koga, H.; Murayama, S.; Suzue, S.; Irikura, T. J. Med. Chem. 1980,
23, 1358-1363.
(15) (a) Grohe, K.; Bayer, A. G. Chem. Abstr. 1980, 92, 41916w. (b) Grohe, K.
J. Prakt. Chem. 1993, 335, 397-409. (c) Grohe, K.; Bayer, A. G. Chem.
Abstr. 1986, 105, 226051r.
9
4616 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 14, 2008