Zhang6 developed the direct conversion of lactams into the
gem-diallylderivatives via reaction with triallylborane and
allylsamarium bromide, respectively. However, none of the
reported approaches (Semmelhack, Bubnov, and Zhang) is
compatible with the presence of an alkyl substituent at the
nitrogen atom. Therefore, an extra N-alkylation step is
required for most application in natural product synthesis.
The conversion of amides into tertiary 2,2-dimethylamines
has been reported by Denton and Wood by direct treatment
of amides with methylmagnesium bromide in the presence
of zirconium or titanium tetrachloride.7 So far, this reaction
is limited to the introduction of a methyl group. Takahata8
and more recently Murai9 have investigated the reactivity
of thioiminium salts derived from thioamides and thiolactams
with nucleophiles leading to 2-monosubstituted and 2,2-
disubstituted amines (Scheme 2). The reaction is promising
Scheme 3. Optimized Conditions for the Preparation of
2,2-Diallyl-N-benzylpyrrolidine from N-Benzylpyrrolidinone
In contrast to Klaver et al.,10 neither the solvent nor the
temperature influences the product distribution. For instance,
when the reaction of 3a was performed with only one
equivalent of allylmagnesium bromide in dichloromethane
at -78 °C, no monoallylation was observed. Instead, the bis-
allylated amine 4a was obtained in 40% yield together with
lactam 1a arising from the aqueous workup.
Scheme 2. Takahata and Murai Alkynylation of Thioiminium
Ions
With allylic organomagnesium reagents, the mechanism
presumably involves an initial addition to the thioiminium
salt leading to the N,S-acetal I followed by a fast fragmenta-
tion, favored by the Lewis acidity of magnesium(II), leading
to the iminium ion II (Scheme 4). The iminium ion II is
Scheme 4. Mechanism of the Double-Allylation Reaction
when alkynyllithium reagents are used first as the nucleo-
phile. The reaction of a thioiminium salt derived from a
[3.2.1] bicyclic amide with a substituted alkyl Grignard
reagent has been investigated by Klaver, Speckamp, and
Hiemstra.10 In THF, the reaction afforded the gem-dialkylated
product in low yield. However, when the reaction was run
in dichloromethane, a good yield of the monoalkylated
product was obtained. In this paper, we report that thio-
iminium salts, easily prepared from lactams and amides, can
be converted into 2,2-disubstitued amines by reaction with
simple nucleophiles such as organomagnesium and organo-
cerium reagents.
gem-Diallylation and gem-Dibenzylation. The thio-
iminium iodide 3a is prepared from N-benzylpyrrolidinone
1a (Scheme 3). Treatment of 1a with the Lawesson’s reagent
affords the thiolactam 2a that is converted into the thio-
iminium salt 3a by treatment with methyl iodide in THF at
room temperature. Treatment of the thioiminium salt 3a with
allylmagnesium bromide affords the desired gem-diallylated
pyrrolidine 4a. Best results are obtained with 3 equiv of
allylmagnesium bromide in THF at room temperature.
more electrophilic than the thioiminium ion 3a, and therefore,
the second nucleophilic addition takes place more rapidly
than the reaction with the thioiminium ion.
The reaction sequence was applied to N-benzylpiperidi-
none 1b and N-benzylazepanone 1c. As nucleophiles, both
allylmagnesium bromide and benzylmagnesium chloride
were successfully tested (Scheme 5). In all cases, the gem-
dialkylated products 4 and 5 are obtained in excellent yields
over the three steps from the parent lactams. The reaction
was also tested with the acetamide 6. Successive treatment
with Lawesson’s reagent, methyl iodide, and benzylmagne-
sium chloride affords the tertiary amine 8 in 66% overall
yield.
Ring-Closing Metathesis (RCM). The bisallylated cyclic
amines 4a-c were then subjected to the RCM reaction.
Despite their high functional group tolerance, ruthenium
carbenes catalysts do not work well in the presence of basic
nitrogen atoms.11 Running the reaction on the free amine
led to low conversion (e20%) after 5 h in refluxing toluene
(4) Semmelhack, M. F.; Chong, B. P.; Stauffer, R. D.; Rogerson, T. D.;
Chong, A.; Jones, L. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 2507-2516.
(5) Nieczypor, P.; Mol, J. C.; Bespalova, Y.; Bubnov, N. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 812-819.
(6) Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. Tetrahedron 2002, 58 (26), 5301-5306.
(7) Denton, M. S.; Wood, A. Synlett 1999, 55-56.
(8) Takahata, H.; Takahashi, K.; Wang, E. C.; Yamazaki, T. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 1211-1214.
(9) Murai, T.; Toshio, R.; Mutoh, Y. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 6312-6320.
(10) Klaver, W. J.; Hiemstra, H.; Speckamp, W. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 2588-2595.
1418
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008