results between diene 1 and aromatic aldehydes with the use
of (R)-BINOL-Ti(OiPr)4 complex.17i However, to the best
of our knowledge, few catalytic systems could induce high
enantioselectivity for aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes in the
HDA reactions. Therefore, searching for universal catalysts
for asymmetric HDA reactions between diene 1 and different
kinds of aldehydes is of great importance.
Many modified BINOLs with different substituents on
naphthalene rings were prepared and used as chiral ligands
in asymmetric catalytic reactions.18-23 Herein, we wish to
report that the titanium(IV) catalysts derived from 3-mono-
substituted or 3,3′-disubstituted (R)-BINOLs could exhibit
an enhanced catalytic activity for the asymmetric HDA
reaction between diene 1 and aromatic or aliphatic aldehydes.
For this purpose, ligands L1-L4 were studied (Figure 1).
We found that L4 in combination with Ti(OiPr)4 could
Figure 1. Structure of diene 1 and chiral ligands L1-L4.
catalyze the HDA reaction with excellent enantioselectivity,
especially for aliphatic aldehydes.
Various ligands (Figure 1) were examined as catalysts for
the HDA reaction between diene 1 and benzaldehyde. The
reactions were carried out in the presence of (R)-BINOL
derivatives L1-L4 (20 mol %) and Ti(OiPr)4 (20 mol %)
in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C for 72 h. Interestingly, we found that the
Ti(IV) complex of 3-diphenylhydroxymethyl-substituted
BINOL ligand (L4) could give the desired product in the
highest yield associated with the highest enantioselectivity.
In contrast, the Ti(IV) complexes of L1-L3 displayed poor
catalytic activity. It could be considered that the monosub-
stituted diphenylhydroxymethyl group played an important
role in the catalytic process.
(2) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Kitahara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7807.
(b) Danishefsky, S. J.; Kerwin, J. F.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 358. (c) Danishefsky, S. J.; Larson, E.; Askin, D.; Kato, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1246. (d) Bednarski, M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7060. (e) Danishefsky, S. J.; Larson, E. R.; Askin,
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6458. (f) Danishefsky, S. J.; Bednarski,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3411. (g) Danishefsky, S. J.; Selnick, H.
G.; Zelle, R. E.; DeNinno, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4368.
(3) Maruoka, K.; Itoh, T.; Shirasaka, T.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 310.
The HDA reaction conditions catalyzed by Ti/L4 were
optimized, and the results are listed in Table 1. The reaction
carried out in toluene could give higher yield and ee than
those in other solvents such as dichloromethane, THF, and
diethyl ether (entries 1-4). The mole ratio 1:1 of metal/
ligand afforded best catalytic results. Slight increase of the
relative amount of L4 resulted in dramatic decrease of ee
(4) Cory, E. J.; Cywin, C. L.; Roper, T. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
6907.
(5) Dosstter, A. G.; Jamison, T. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 2398.
(6) Doyl, M. P.; Phillips, I. M.; Hu, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
5366.
(7) Simonsen, K. B.; Svenstrup, N.; Roberson, M.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 123.
(8) Evans, D. A.; Johnson, J. S.; Olhava, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1635.
(9) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L.; Cossy, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41,625.
(10) Mikamia, K.; Motoyama, Y.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 2812.
(11) Wang, B.; Feng, X.-M.; Huang, Y.-Z.; Liu, H.; Cui, X.; Jiang, Y.-
Z. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2175.
Table 1. HDA Reaction between Diene 1 and Benzaldehyde
Catalyzed by Ti/L4 under Various Conditionsa
(12) Long, J.; Hu, J.-Y.; Shen, X.; Ji, B.; Ding, K.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 10.
(13) Du, H.-F.; Long, J.; Hu, J.-Y.; Li, X.; Ding, K.-L. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 4349.
(14) Yamashita, Y.; Saito, S.; Ishitani, H.; Kobayashi, S. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 1221.
(15) Unni, A. K.; Takenaka, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1336.
(16) Zhang, X.; Du, H.-F.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.-D.; Ding, K.-L. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 2862.
L4:Ti(OiPr)4
(mol %)
entry solvent
T (°C) yield (%)a,b ee (%)c
(17) (a) Bednarski, M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
6968. (b) Yang, W.-Q.; Shang, D.-J.; Liu, Y.-L.; Du, Y.; Feng, X.-M. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8533. (c) Lin, L.-L.; Liou, X.-H.; Feng, X.-M. Synlett
2007, 2147. (d) Yu, Z.-P.; Liou, X.-H.; Dong, Z.-P.; Xie, M.-S.; Feng, X.-
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1308. (e) Yao, S.; Johannsen, M.;
Audrain, H.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
8599. (f) Johannsen, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5757.
(g) Gong, L.-Z.; Pu, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2327. (h)Yamashita,
Y.; Saito, S.; Ishitani, H.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
3793. (i) Gao, B.; Fu, Z.-Y.; Yu, Z.-P.; Yu, L.; Huang, Y.; Feng, X.-M.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5822. (j) Williams, D. R.; Heidebrecht, R. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1843.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CH2Cl2
THF
Et2O
20:20
20:20
20:20
20:20
22:20
24:20
30:20
18:20
16:20
10:20
20:20
20:20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
87
94
87
98
99
90
81
99
96
80
88
99
86
86
45
94
45
28
-8
88
87
30
81
84
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
9
10
11
12
0
(18) (a) Chen, Y.; Yekta, S.; Yudin, A. K. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3155.
(b) Kocovsky, P.; Vyskocil, S.; Smrcina, M. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3213.
(c) Brunel, J. M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 857.
-20
25
(19) Huang, W.-S.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4222.
(20) Qin, Y.-C.; Liu, L.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2381.
(21) Qin, Y.-C.; Pu, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 273.
(22) Harada, T.; Kanda, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3817.
(23) Wang, Q.; Chen, S.-Y.; Yu, X.-Q.; Pu, L. Tetrahedron 2007, 63,
4422.
a Unless indicated, all reactions were carried out on a 0.20 mmol scale
with L4 and Ti(OiPr)4 (20 mol %) in 2.0 mL of solvent at 0 °C for 72 h.
b Isolated yields. c The ee values were determined by HPLC using chiralcel
OJ column.
1300
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008