Halogenated 1-Hydroxynaphthalene-2-Carboxanilides affecting photosynthetic electron transport in photosystem II

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules22101709

Series of seventeen new multihalogenated 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides was prepared and characterized. All the compounds were tested for their activity related to the inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in spinach (Spinacia olera

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules22101709

molecules
Article
Halogenated 1-Hydroxynaphthalene-2-Carboxanilides
Affecting Photosynthetic Electron Transport in
Photosystem II †
Tomas Gonec 1,*, Jiri Kos 1,2, Matus Pesko 3, Jana Dohanosova 4, Michal Oravec 5, Tibor Liptaj 4,
Katarina Kralova 6 and Josef Jampilek 2,
*
ID
1
Department of Chemical Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Palackeho 1, Brno 61242, Czech Republic; jurd@email.cz
2
3
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Odbojarov 10,
Bratislava 83232, Slovakia
Department of Environmental Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovicova 6,
Bratislava 84215, Slovakia; matus.pesko@gmail.com
Central Laboratories, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava,
Radlinskeho 9, Bratislava 81237, Slovakia; jana.dohanosova@stuba.sk (J.D.); tibor.liptaj@stuba.sk (T.L.)
Global Change Research Institute CAS, Belidla 986/4a, 60300 Brno, Czech Republic; oravec.m@czechglobe.cz
Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovicova 6, Bratislava 84215,
Slovakia; kata.kralova@gmail.com
5
6
*
†
Correspondence: t.gonec@seznam.cz (T.G.); josef.jampilek@gmail.com (J.J.); Tel.: +420-541-562-938 (T.G.)
Preliminary results were presented at the 46th EuroCongress on Drug Synthesis and Analysis, Bratislava,
Slovakia, 5–8 September 2017 (paper P-61).
Received: 21 September 2017; Accepted: 9 October 2017; Published: 12 October 2017
Abstract: Series of seventeen new multihalogenated 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides was
prepared and characterized. All the compounds were tested for their activity related to the
inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts.
1-Hydroxy-N-phenylnaphthalene-2-carboxamides substituted in the anilide part by 3,5-dichloro-,
4-bromo-3-chloro-, 2,5-dibromo- and 3,4,5-trichloro atoms were the most potent PET inhibitors
(IC50 = 5.2, 6.7, 7.6 and 8.0 µM, respectively). The inhibitory activity of these compounds depends on
the position and the type of halogen substituents, i.e., on lipophilicity and electronic properties of
individual substituents of the anilide part of the molecule. Interactions of the studied compounds
with chlorophyll a and aromatic amino acids present in pigment-protein complexes mainly in PS II
were documented by fluorescence spectroscopy. The section between P680 and plastoquinone QB
in the PET chain occurring on the acceptor side of PS II can be suggested as the site of action of the
compounds. The structure-activity relationships are discussed.
Keywords: hydroxynaphthalene-carboxamides; photosynthetic electron transport (PET) inhibition;
spinach chloroplasts; structure-activity relationships
1. Introduction
In spite of the fact that various classes of herbicides are known and currently can be classified
according to about 20 different modes of action [
binding to photosystem II (PS II) [ ]. This effect results in the interruption of the photosynthetic
electron transport (PET) [ ]. PS II uses light energy to drive two chemical reactions: the oxidation of
1], over 50% of marketed herbicides act by reversible
2
3–5
water and the reduction of plastoquinone. The following redox components of PS II participate in the
transfer of electrons from H2O to the plastoquinone pool: water oxidizing manganese cluster (Mn)4
and redox-active tyrosine (Tyrz) situated on the donor side of PS II, reaction centre chlorophyll (P680)
Molecules 2017, 22, 1709; doi:10.3390/molecules22101709
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
2 of 12
and components situated on the acceptor side of PS II, namely pheophytin and two plastoquinone
molecules, QA and QB. While the plastoquinone molecule QA acting as a one-electron acceptor
is permanently bound to PS II, the plastoquinone molecule QB acting as a two-electron acceptor
is loosely bound at the QB-site, and reduced plastoquinone unbinds from the reaction centre and
diffuses in the hydrophobic core of the membrane, whereby QB-binding site will be occupied by an
oxidized plastoquinone molecule [6]. Herbicides belonging to photosystem (PS) II inhibitors inhibit
photosynthetic electron transport (PET) by binding to the QB-binding niche on the D1 protein of the
PS II complex in chloroplast thylakoid membranes, which results in the inhibition of photosynthetic
electron transport (PET) from QA to QB, blockage of CO2 fixation and inhibition of ATP production.
Many QSAR studies of PS II inhibitors with diverse chemical structures have emphasized the
hydrophobic nature of the binding domain, with lipophilicity being the dominant determinant of Hill
inhibition activity [7], e.g., the review paper of Lambreva et al. [8] presents a compendious overview
of the recent improvements in the understanding of the structure and function of PS II donor side
with a focus on the interactions of the plastoquinone cofactors with the surrounding environment and
operational features. PET inhibitors in the functional dissection of the photosynthetic electron transport
system were summarized in the review paper of Trebst [9], and a comprehensive overview of synthetic
photosynthetic inhibitors and those based on natural products was published by Teixeira et al. [10].
Many herbicides acting as PET inhibitors in PS II containing an amide and/or a carbamate moiety,
which is able to form hydrogen bonds between the CONH/NHCOO group of amides/carbamates and
the target proteins in photosynthetic centres of thylakoid membranes resulting in changes in protein
conformation and finally in PET inhibition, have been shown to be the most potent type of this class of
herbicides [11–13]. Both moieties can be substituted, and thus, their properties can be modified [14,15].
Amides are considered to be PS II inhibitors causing displacement of QB from its binding pocket in
the D1 protein [16], and halogen substituents were found to contribute to enhanced PET-inhibiting
activity [10
–12, –23]. Our team has investigated effects of various amides [11,16,18–22,24–28] or
17
carbamates [29
–
34] on biological systems, in particular, as anti-invasive agents for, a long time.
In addition, some of previously published agents showed herbicidal properties associated with adverse
effects on PS II [12,13,16,18–24,28,29,33].
In the context of the above-mentioned facts, new di- and trichlorinated and brominated
1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides were prepared and characterized and tested for their activity
related to the PET inhibition in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. The results were completed
by seven recently published unsubstituted and monochlorinated and brominated derivatives [11], and
the structure–activity relationships (SAR) of all the mentioned compounds are discussed.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The discussed anilides were synthesized using microwave-assisted synthesis as described in
Gonec et al. [11]. All the studied compounds were prepared according to Scheme 1. The condensation of
1-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid and ring-substituted aniline using phosphorus trichloride in chlorobenzene
gave a series of twenty-four 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides 1–24.
Physicochemical descriptors—lipophilicity of the compounds expressed as log P and electronic
parameters of individual anilides—were calculated for all the investigated compounds by means of the
ACD/Percepta ver. 2012 program, see Table 1. Log P values ranged from 4.52 (unsubstituted anilide
to 6.34 (2,4,6-Br substituted compound 20). In general, it can be stated that the lipophilicity is rather
high; nevertheless, the recommended log P value for agrochemicals is 5 [35]. Beside unsubstituted
compound 1, monohalogenated anilides expressed the lowest lipophilicity, while trisubstituted
derivatives 14 16 and 20 possessed the highest log P values, and in general brominated compounds
showed higher lipophilicity than chlorinated. For individual N-aryl parts of the anilides also electronic
properties expressed as electronic constants of the whole substituted phenyl ring were predicted;
they ranged from 0.60 (compound 1) to 1.56 (2,4,5-Cl substituted derivative 16).
σ
1)
≤
2–7
–
σ

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
3 of 12
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ring-substituted 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides
conditions: (a) PCl3, chlorobenzene, microwave synthesis.
1–24. Reagents and
Table 1. Structure of ring-substituted 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides
1–24, calculated
values of log P, electronic parameters of anilide (Ar) substituents and IC50 M] values related
σ
[µ
to photosynthetic electron transport (PET) inhibition in spinach chloroplasts in comparison with
3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) standard.
a
Comp.
R
log P a
σ(Ar)
PET Inhibition IC50 [µM]
1 b
2 b
3 b
4 b
5 b
6 b
7 b
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
H
2-Cl
3-Cl
4-Cl
2-Br
3-Br
4-Br
2,3-Cl
2,4-Cl
2,5-Cl
2,6-Cl
3,4-Cl
3,5-Cl
2,4,5-Cl
2,4,6-Cl
3,4,5-Cl
2,4-Br
2,5-Br
2,6-Br
2,4,6-Br
2-Br-4-Cl
4-Br-2-Cl
5-Br-2-Cl
4-Br-3-Cl
-
4.52
5.02
5.25
5.24
5.06
5.39
5.28
5.76
5.78
5.82
5.52
5.99
6.01
6.31
6.15
6.28
5.90
5.81
5.67
6.34
5.80
5.88
5.82
6.02
-
0.60
1.05
0.85
0.75
0.97
0.86
0.74
1.22
1.12
1.22
1.33
1.19
1.11
1.56
1.48
1.46
1.11
1.23
1.33
1.47
1.12
1.11
1.23
1.19
-
31.3
29.4
7.9
10.8
61.9
8.2
9.6
235.3
531.0
59.6
100.5
13.3
5.2
153.2
10.6
8.0
505.1
7.6
78.0
45.0
277.5
171.0
60.3
6.7
21
22
23
24
DCMU
1.9
a
calculated using ACD/Percepta ver. 2012 (Advanced Chemistry Development, Toronto, ON, Canada); b published
in Gonec et al. [11].
2.2. Inhibition of Photosynthetic Electron Transport (PET) in Spinach Chloroplasts
In this contribution, variously chlorinated and brominated anilides and their PET-inhibiting
activity are discussed. The PET-inhibiting activity was expressed by IC50 value (compound
concentration causing 50% inhibition of PET), see Table 1. The activity of the studied compounds
was compared with diuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea; DCMU), a commercial PET
inhibitor. The obtained activity showed a wide range of PET inhibition, from 5.2
13, R = 3,5-Cl) to 531 M (compound , R = 2,4-Cl). In general, it can be stated that chlorinated
derivatives demonstrated higher potency than bromine derivatives. 2,4-Disubstituted compounds, i.e.,
R = 2,4-Cl), 17 R = 2,4-Br), 21 (R = 2-Br-4-Cl), 22 (R = 2-Cl-4-Br), and one 2,3-disubstituted compound
µM (compound
µ
9
9
(
(

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
4 of 12
8
(R = 2,3-Cl) showed limited aqueous solubility compared with 2,5-, 2,6-, 3,4- and 3,5-disubstituted
derivatives or the rest of compounds. Therefore, these compounds are excluded from the SAR
discussion and this is illustrated on the figures by empty symbols, see below. It should be noted
that the highest potency with IC50 = 5.2
13 (R = 3,5-Cl), while the trisubstituted analogue—compound 16 (R = 3,4,5-Cl)—expressed already
PET-inhibiting activity IC50 = 8.0 M, and mono-chlorinated derivatives and showed IC50 of 7.9
µM was shown by symmetrically disubstituted compound
µ
3
4
µM
(R = 3-Cl) and 10.8 µM (R = 4-Cl), respectively. Thus, it seems that physicochemical properties resulting
from C0(3,5) position of both chlorine atoms are preferable.
The dependences of the PET-inhibiting activity on the lipophilicity of the discussed mono-, di-
and tri-N-aryl substituted anilides are shown in Figure 1A. Similar trends for mono- and disubstituted
compounds can be observed—the PET-inhibiting activity increases with increasing lipophilicity, while
an opposite trend can be found for trisubstituted derivatives. Thus, it seems that for PET-inhibiting
activity, a lipophilicity optimum is in the range of log P from 6.01 (compound 13) to 6.28 (compound 16),
see Figure 1A. It is important to note that a PET inhibition depends also on the electronic effects of
individual substituents within series of different PET inhibitors [11
,12,21–23]. The dependences of the
PET-inhibiting activity on the electron parameters of the whole N-aryl part of individual anilides
σ
are illustrated in Figure 1B. Practically the same trends can be found for mono-, di- and trisubstituted
derivatives; the PET inhibition sharply decreases with the increasing electron-withdrawing effect of
individual anilides (i.e., with high amide bond electron-deficiency) as follows: compound
3
(
(R = 3-Cl,
= 0.97, IC50 = 61.9 R = 3,5-Cl
= 1.33, IC50 = 100.5 µM); compound 16
σ
= 0.85, IC50 = 7.9
µM) >>> compound
5
(R = 2-Br,
σ
µM); compound 13
,
σ
= 1.11, IC50 = 5.2
µM) >>> compound 11 (R = 2,6-Cl,
σ
(R = 3,4,5-Cl, σ = 1.46, IC50 = 8.0 µM) >>> compound 14 (R = 2,4,5-Cl, σ = 1.56, IC50 = 153.2 µM).
A
B
5.4
5.2
5.0
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
5.4
5.2
5.0
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
3,5-Cl
4-Br-3-Cl
3,5-Cl
4-Br-3-Cl
3-Cl
3,4,5-Cl
3,4,5-Cl
2,4,6-Cl
3-Cl
4-Cl
3-Br
4-Br
4-Cl
2,5-Br
3,4-Cl
2,5-Br
3-Br
2,4,6-Cl
4-Br
3,4-Cl
2-Cl
2-Cl
2,4,6-Br
H
H
2,4,6-Br
2,5-Cl
2-Br
2,5-Cl
5-Br-2-Cl
2-Br
2,6-Br
2,6-Cl
2,6-Br
2,6-Cl
5-Br-2-Cl
4-Br-2-Cl
2,4,5-Cl
2,4,5-Cl
4-Br-2-Cl
2-Br-4-Cl
2,4-Br
2,3-Cl
2-Br-4-Cl
2,4-Br
2,3-Cl
2,4-Cl
2,4-Cl
4.5 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.5
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
σ
1.4
1.6
1.8
log P
H (1) mono (2-7) di (8-19,21-24) tri (14-16,20)
H (1) mono (2-7) di (8-19,21-24) tri (14-16,20)
Figure 1. Dependence of PET-inhibiting activity log(1/IC50 [M]) of all discussed compounds
in spinach chloroplasts on lipophilicity expressed as log P ( ) and electronic
1
–
24
A
σ
parameters of whole
N-aryl part of individual anilides (B). Empty squares are not involved in SAR discussion.
1,5-Diphenylcarbazide (DPC), an efficient artificial electron donor to the inactive oxygen-evolving
complex (OEC) of PS II acting in Z/D intermediate situated on the donor side of PS II can be used for a
more precise determination of the site of action of the tested compounds in the PET chain [36–38]. This
intermediate ensures electron transport from the OEC to the core of PS II (P680) [39]. Consequently,
an addition of DPC can completely restore the activity of chloroplasts, which was inhibited by PET
inhibitors acting on the donor side of PS II. However, the addition of DPC to chloroplasts, the activity
of which was inhibited by tested compounds approximately up to 80% (i.e., corresponding to 20%
activity of the control), caused gradual PET restoration with increasing DPC concentration, and
complete activity restoration was obtained only with 12-fold higher DPC concentration compared
to the concentration of the applied PET inhibitor. Based on this finding, it could be suggested
that the site of inhibitory action of the halogenated 1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides is
situated on the acceptor side of PS II, at the section between P680 (primary donor of PS II) and
QB. The complete restoration of PET using DPC concentration exceeding that of the applied

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
5 of 12
inhibitor by more than one order of magnitude indicates that, due to direct interaction of DPC
with the herbicide binding niche, these PET inhibitors were displaced from their binding site, as
was similarly shown for atrazine [40] or metribuzin [41]. The plastoquinone QB at the acceptor
side of PS II was found to be the site of inhibitory action of N-benzylpyrazine-2-carboxamides [42
]
and N-alkoxyphenyl-3-hydroxy-naphthalene-2-carboxamides [16] as well as ring-substituted
salicylanilides, carbamoylphenyl-carbamates [29] and 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxamides [23].
In isolated chloroplasts, the interaction of a PET inhibitor with chlorophyll a (Chla) molecules
situated in pigment–protein complexes in PS II is reflected in changes of the intensity of Chla
fluorescence emission band at 686 nm. A gradual decrease of the intensity of this Chla emission band
at 686 nm with the increasing concentration of N-(5-bromo-2-chlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-
2-carboxamide (23) (Figure 2A) indicates increased perturbation of Chla–protein complexes in the
thylakoid membrane [43] by this PET inhibitor. A similar Chla fluorescence decrease in spinach
chloroplasts was observed previously for several PET inhibitors, such as substituted benzanilides [44],
N-benzylpyrazine-2-carboxamides [42], 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxy-N-phenylbenzamides [45], ring-
substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxamides [23], 3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamides [21
]
and 2-alkylpyridine-4-carboxylic acids [46].
In addition, the interaction of PET inhibitors with aromatic amino acids (AAA), mainly
tryptophan and tyrosine, occurring in photosynthetic proteins situated mainly in PS II can
be investigated using the fluorescence method. In the presence of the tested halogenated
1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides, quenching of AAA fluorescence at 334 nm was observed,
which showed an increase with increasing concentration of PET inhibitors, which is presented in
Figure 2B for the model compound 23. It could be assumed that the decrease in fluorescence is
caused by a change in the environment of AAAs upon interaction with the tested compounds.
The quenching of the AAA fluorescence in the presence of various PET inhibitors such as
ring-substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxamides [23], 5-bromo- and 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxy-
N-phenylbenzamides [45], N-substituted 5-amino-6-methylpyrazine-2,3-dicarbonitriles [47] and
2-substituted 6-fluoro-benzothiazoles [48] was observed previously.
A
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
B
80
60
40
20
0
600
650
700
750
275
300
325
[nm]
350
375
400
[nm]
Figure 2. Fluorescence emission spectra of chlorophyll a in untreated spinach chloroplasts in presence
of compound 23 (R = 5-Br-2-Cl; c = 0, 56, 220, and 431 M; curves from top to bottom); excitation
wave length = 436 nm, chlorophyll concentration 10 mg/L ( ) and fluorescence emission spectra of
aromatic amino acids in suspension of spinach chloroplasts without and with compound 23 (c = 0, 5.9,
11.8, 23.6, 29.5 and 47.2 M; curves from top to bottom); excitation wave length = 275 nm, chlorophyll
µ
λ
ex
A
µ
λ
concentration 10 mg/L (B).
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. General Information
All reagents were purchased from Merck (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Alfa
(Alfa-Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA). Reactions were performed using a CEM Discover SP microwave

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
6 of 12
reactor (CEM, Matthews, NC, USA). The melting points were determined on a Kofler hot-plate
apparatus HMK (Franz Kustner Nacht KG, Dresden, Germany) and are uncorrected. Infrared (IR)
spectra were recorded on a Smart MIRacle™ ATR ZnSe for Nicolet™ Impact 410 Fourier-transform
IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL, USA). The spectra were obtained by the
1
accumulation of 256 scans with 2 cm−1 resolution in the region of 4000–650 cm−1. All H- and
1
13C-NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent VNMRS 600 MHz system (600 MHz for H and
150 MHz for 13C, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6).
1H and 13C chemical shifts (
δ) are reported in ppm. The prepared compounds were analysed by
an ultra-high performance liquid chromatograph (Dionex UltiMate® 3000 Liquid Chromatography
Systems, Thermo Scientific) coupled with a diode-array detector (DAD, Thermo Scientific) and a high
resolution Hybrid Ion Trap-Orbitrap XL
Scientific). A chromatographic column Hypersil Gold (Thermo Scientific), C18 3
™
Fourier transform mass spectrometer (HRMS, Thermo
m, 2.1 mm 50 mm,
µ
×
was used. The mixture of MeCN-HPLC grade (20.0%) and H2O-HPLC grade with 0.1% AcOH (80.0%)
was use◦d as a mobile phase. The total flow of the column was 0.3 mL/min; the column temperature
was 30 C; and the time of analysis was 10 min. The records were evaluated from the DAD and
HRMS-Orbitrap. The wavelengths of 210, 254, 272, 274, 331 nm and 190–800 nm were monitored. The
peaks in the chromatogram of the solvent (blank) were deducted from the peaks in the chromatogram
of the sample solution. The purity of individual compounds was determined from the area peaks in
the chromatogram of the sample solution at wavelength of 210 nm. MS and MSn were performed
using the HRMS-Orbitrap equipped with a HESI II (heated electrospray ionization) source.
3.2. Synthesis
General Procedure for Synthesis of N-(substituted phenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamides 1–24
1-Hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxylic acid (5.3 mmol) and the corresponding substituted aniline
(5.3 mmol) were suspended in 30 mL of dry chlorobenzene. Phosphorous trichloride (2.65 mmol) was
added dropwise, and the reacting mixture was heated in the microwave reactor at maximal allowed
power 500 W and 130 ◦C, using infrared flask-surface control of temperature, for 15 min. The solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure, the solid residue washed with 2 M HCl, and the crude
product was recrystallized from aqueous ethanol. All the studied compounds are presented in Table 1.
Described anilides 1–7 were characterized recently by Gonec et al. [11].
◦
N-(2,3-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (
8
). Yield 59%; m.p. 199–201 C; HPLC purity
98.32%; IR (cm−1): 3418, 1634, 1580, 1532, 1504, 1450, 1408, 1390, 1358, 1327, 1302, 1271, 1243, 1205,
1190, 1150, 1089, 1044, 878, 824, 799, 779, 770, 755, 738, 722, 700; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.67 (br. s,
1H), 10.84 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 8.08 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.66–7.72 (m,
2H), 7.63 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, J = 6.9, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz),
7.47 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.22, 159.37, 136.23, 136.14, 132.06, 129.24, 128.49,
128.44, 128.26, 127.61, 127.27, 126.06, 124.66, 123.23, 123.12, 118.41, 107.61; HR-MS: [M
330.00831 m/z, found 330.01007 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated
◦
N-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (
9
). Yield 76%; m.p. 181–184 C; HPLC purity
98.45%; IR (cm−1): 3422, 1629, 1580, 1524, 1503, 1472, 1456, 1391, 1331, 1300, 1243, 1211, 1098, 867, 818,
796, 787, 761, 715; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.67 (br. s, 1H), 10.74 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 8.08
(d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.68 (ddd,
1H, J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 0.9 Hz), 7.59 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, J = 6.9, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.53 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, J = 2.3 Hz),
7.49 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.17, 159.31, 136.13, 133.40, 131.40, 130.70, 129.70,
129.22, 129.16, 127.87, 127.60, 126.04, 124.66, 123.24, 123.11, 118.40, 107.67; HR-MS: [M
330.00831 m/z, found 330.01007 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated
◦
N-(2,5-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (10). Yield 69%; m.p. 194–196 C; HPLC
purity 99.08%; IR (cm−1): 3418, 1632, 1583, 1525, 1502, 1471, 1407, 1392, 1320, 1280, 1239, 1209, 1151,

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
7 of 12
1
1089, 1047, 916, 876, 806, 786, 757, 725; H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.47 (s, 1H), 10.83 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d,
1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 8.05–8.10 (m, 1H), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.6 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.68 (ddd, 1H,
J = 8.2, J = 6.9, J = 1.3 Hz), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.3, J = 7.0, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.51
(d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.42 (dd, 1H, J = 8.7, J = 2.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 168.70, 158.81, 136.15,
135.64, 131.69, 130.92, 129.17, 127.67, 127.61, 127.40, 127.38, 126.03, 124.71, 123.48, 123.13, 118.58, 108.25;
HR-MS: [M − H]+ calculated 330.00831 m/z, found 330.00986 m/z.
◦
N-(2,6-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (11). Yield 59%; m.p. 199–202 C; HPLC
purity 98.82%; IR (cm−1): 3309, 1635, 1616, 1596, 1568, 1529, 1499, 1448, 1435, 1383, 1331, 1283, 1252,
1
1209, 944, 796, 766, 721, 701; H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.85 (s, 1H), 10.76 (s, 1H), 8.28–8.33 (m, 1H),
8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.69 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 6.9, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.65 (d, 2H,
J = 8.2 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 1.0 Hz), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.47 (t, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz);
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
124.56, 123.07, 122.72, 118.23, 106.37; HR-MS: [M
δ: 169.90, 160.22, 136.15, 134.14, 132.10, 130.02, 129.37, 128.69, 127.58, 126.12,
−
H]+ calculated 330.00831 m/z, found 330.00943 m/z.
◦
N-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (12). Yield 84%; m.p. 195–197 C; HPLC
purity 99.14%; IR (cm−1): 3429, 1628, 1601, 1584, 1574, 1527, 1504, 1467, 1390, 1320, 1298, 1274, 1247,
1210, 1144, 1127, 1088, 1026, 939, 871, 797, 785, 759, 729; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.85 (s, 1H), 10.76 (s,
1H), 8.28–8.33 (m, 1H), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.69 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 6.9,
J = 1.2 Hz), 7.65 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 1.0 Hz), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz),
7.47 (t, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.56, 159.90, 137.90, 136.06, 130.86, 130.52, 129.28,
127.47, 126.21, 126.00, 124.56, 123.09, 123.00, 122.94, 121.68, 117.99, 107.42; HR-MS: [M
330.00831 m/z, found 330.00970 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated
◦
N-(3,5-Dichlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (13). Yield 80%; m.p. 190–194 C; HPLC
purity 99.09%; IR (cm−1): 3431, 1626, 1585, 1568, 1526, 1504, 1443, 1407, 1387, 1300, 1267, 1204, 1144,
1
1086, 882, 823, 787, 755, 723; H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.48 (br. s, 1H), 10.61 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H,
J = 8.2 Hz), 8.04 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.88 (d, 2H, J = 1.6 Hz), 7.68 (ddd, 1H,
J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 1.3 Hz), 7.58 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 1.0 Hz), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.39 (t,
1H, J = 1.8 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.69, 159.91, 140.23, 136.12, 133.92, 129.37, 127.50, 126.06,
124.56, 123.70, 123.13, 122.94, 119.74, 118.08, 107.45; HR-MS: [M
330.00958 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated 330.00831 m/z, found
1-Hydroxy-N-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)naphthalene-2-carboxamide (14). Yield 77%; m.p. 211–215 ◦C; HPLC
purity 98.56%; IR (cm−1): 3422, 1630, 1574, 1514, 1501, 1470, 1446, 1392, 1367, 1320, 1287, 1269, 1242,
1205, 1146, 1088, 1068, 947, 884, 829, 876, 797, 785, 760, 715, 678; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.39 (br. s,
1H), 10.90 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.06 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d,
1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.68 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, J = 6.9, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, J = 6.9, J = 1.4 Hz),
7.51 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 168.63, 158.72, 136.19, 134.59, 130.67, 130.05, 129.24,
129.10, 128.55, 128.33, 127.64, 126.09, 124.71, 123.52, 123.16, 118.68, 108.30; HR-MS: [M
363.96934 m/z, found 363.97119 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated
1-Hydroxy-N-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)naphthalene-2-carboxamide (15). Yield 75%; m.p. 214–216 ◦C; HPLC
purity 98.91%; IR (cm−1): 3303, 1631, 1616, 1597, 1556, 1524, 1500, 1468, 1445, 1407, 1385, 1320, 1278,
1241, 1211, 1189, 1154, 1142, 942, 851, 832, 796, 763, 713; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.73 (br. s, 1H), 10.79
(s, 1H), 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.09 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.89 (s, 2H), 7.70 (ddd,
1H, J = 8.2, J = 6.9, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, J = 7.1, J = 1.1 Hz), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz); 13C-NMR
(DMSO-d6), δ: 169.92, 160.22, 136.19, 134.96, 133.31, 131.54, 129.46, 128.50, 127.61, 126.18, 124.53, 123.09,
122.68, 118.33, 106.27; HR-MS: [M − H]+ calculated 363.96934 m/z, found 363.97119 m/z.
1-Hydroxy-N-(3,4,5-trichlorophenyl)naphthalene-2-carboxamide (16). Yield 71%; m.p. 245–248 ◦C; HPLC
purity 99.28%; IR (cm−1): 3430, 1627, 1598, 1575, 1515, 1501, 1467, 1432, 1380, 1356, 1309, 1287, 1267,
1244, 1205, 1150, 1076, 959, 882, 870, 822, 797, 787, 757, 723, 682; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.41 (br. s,
1H), 10.64 (s, 1H), 8.29 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 8.08 (s, 2H), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz),

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
8 of 12
7.65–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.47 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.68, 159.95,
173.99, 136.14, 132.69, 129.42, 127.51, 126.08, 124.70, 124.55, 123.14, 122.86, 121.44, 118.12, 107.38; HR-MS:
[M − H]+ calculated 363.96934 m/z, found 363.97119 m/z.
◦
N-(2,4-Dibromophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (17). Yield 69%; m.p. 185–188 C; HPLC
purity 99.71%; IR (cm−1): 3410, 1630, 1575, 1521, 1502, 1471, 1456, 1410, 1389, 1378, 1358, 1328, 1300,
1236, 1209, 1151, 1085, 943, 866, 819, 795, 786, 760, 718, 694; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.72 (br. s, 1H),
10.69 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H,
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.62–7.71 (m, 3H) 7.57–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.49 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
: 169.22,
δ
159.45, 136.12, 135.28, 134.72, 131.31, 130.43, 129.23, 127.60, 126.05, 124.65, 123.16, 123.11, 121.83, 119.82,
118.34, 107.55; HR-MS: [M − H]+ calculated 417.90727 m/z, found 417.90927 m/z.
◦
N-(2,5-Dibromophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (18). Yield 72%; m.p. 198–200 C; HPLC
purity 98.82%; IR (cm−1): 3393, 1642, 1630, 1576, 1522, 1502, 1467, 1401, 1390, 1357, 1323, 1284, 1237,
1206, 1150, 1086, 1027, 943, 898, 871, 788, 750, 725; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.58 (br. s, 1H), 10.78 (s,
1H), 8.33 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz),
7.73 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.66–7.71 (m, 1H) 7.57–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.52 (m, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
:
168.98, 159.15, 137.32, 136.14, 134.34, 131.02, 130.97, 129.22, 127.62, 126.06, 124.68, 123.32, 123.13, 120.42,
119.44, 118.46, 107.87; HR-MS: [M − H]+ calculated 417.90727 m/z, found 417.90927 m/z.
◦
N-(2,6-Dibromophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (19). Yield 64%; m.p. 212–216 C; HPLC
purity 98.36%; IR (cm−1): 3283, 1633, 1616, 1595, 1558, 1522, 1498, 1465, 1441, 1429, 1408, 1382, 1325,
1281, 1209, 1191, 1152, 944, 793, 763, 720, 697; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.89 (s, 1H), 10.81 (s, 1H), 8.30
(d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.83 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.69 (ddd,
1H, J = 8.1, J = 6.9, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.60 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.1, J = 7.0, J = 1.0 Hz), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.30 (t,
1H, J = 8.1 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.70, 160.19, 136.12, 134.85, 132.34, 130.87, 129.31, 127.55,
126.08, 124.59, 124.55, 123.03, 122.72, 118.16, 106.46; HR-MS: [M
417.90894 m/z.
−
H]+ calculated 417.9727 m/z, found
1-Hydroxy-N-(2,4,6-tribromophenyl)naphthalene-2-carboxamide (20). Yield 77%; m.p. 115–118 ◦C; HPLC
purity 99.18%; IR (cm−1): 3266, 1610, 1596, 1520, 1500, 1467, 1440, 1387, 1371, 1321, 1273, 1256, 1209,
1
1153, 1089, 943, 854, 805, 793, 764, 744, 721, 697; H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.79 (br. s, 1H), 10.81 (s,
1H), 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.13 (s, 2H), 8.08 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.67–7.72 (m,
1H), 7.58–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.50 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
134.48, 129.42, 127.60, 126.16, 125.44, 124.55, 123.07, 122.69, 121.88, 118.26, 106.37; HR-MS: [M
calculated 495.81777 m/z, found 495.82037 m/z.
δ
: 169.62, 160.25, 136.17, 134.71,
−
H]+
◦
N-(2-Bromo-4-chlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (21). Yield 69%; m.p. 182–184 C; HPLC
purity 99.02%; IR (cm−1): 3404, 1631, 1575, 1520, 1503, 1471, 1453, 1414, 1387, 1328, 1296, 1271, 1234,
1
1208, 1140, 1087, 1033, 1023, 941, 858, 832, 822, 796, 788, 758, 733, 706, 694; H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ:
13.72 (s, 1H), 10.71 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.91–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.70 (d,
J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ:
169.30, 159.48, 136.10, 134.88, 132.04, 131.77, 130.12, 129.21, 128.37, 127.58, 126.04, 124.65, 123.13, 123.10,
121.59, 118.32, 107.49; HR-MS: [M + H]+ calculated 375.97344 m/z, found 375.97415 m/z.
◦
N-(4-Bromo-2-chlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (22). Yield 56%; m.p. 186–187 C; HPLC
purity 98.84%; IR (cm−1): 3425, 1628, 1588, 1575, 1520, 1502, 1471, 1456, 1409, 1390, 1382, 1359, 1327,
1
1299, 1236, 1210, 1168, 1149, 1078, 1048, 1022, 943, 868, 811, 796, 786, 760, 735, 711, 698; H-NMR
(DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.63 (s, 1H), 10.73 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d,
J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.71 (m, 3H), 7.57–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H);
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 169.06, 159.23, 136.12, 133.81, 131.85, 130.79, 130.77, 129.89, 129.19, 127.60,
126.04, 124.67, 123.27, 123.11, 119.30, 118.42, 107.76; HR-MS: [M + H]+ calculated 375.97344 m/z, found
375.97415 m/z.

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
9 of 12
◦
N-(5-Bromo-2-chlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (23). Yield 35%; m.p. 178–180 C; HPLC
purity 99.26%; IR (cm−1): 3422, 1632, 1582, 1524, 1503, 1470, 1404, 1388, 1360, 1323, 1288, 1271, 1260,
1240, 1207, 1165, 1151, 1087, 1080, 1041, 1033, 942, 866, 796, 784, 755, 727, 715, 705; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ
: 13.48 (br. s, 1H), 10.82 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.63 (m, 3H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ:
168.76, 158.86, 136.16, 135.82, 131.23, 130.38, 130.33, 129.19, 128.40, 127.63, 126.07, 124.71, 123.47, 123.15,
119.72, 118.59, 108.18; HR-MS: [M + H]+ calculated 375.97344 m/z, found 375.97421 m/z.
◦
N-(4-Bromo-3-chlorophenyl)-1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide (24). Yield 58%; m.p. 203–205 C; HPLC
purity 99.53%; IR (cm−1): 3429, 1627, 1599, 1572, 1520, 1504, 1464, 1406, 1381, 1321, 1293, 1272, 1245,
1207, 1150, 1139, 1114, 1086, 1012, 935, 869, 794, 783, 757, 727, 695; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 13.61 (s, 1H),
10.67 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,
1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR
(DMSO-d6), δ: 169.58, 159.92, 138.51, 136.08, 133.76, 132.92, 129.32, 127.50, 126.04, 124.58, 123.10, 122.96,
122.89, 121.83, 118.01, 116.08, 107.45; HR-MS: [M + H]+ calculated 375.97344 m/z, found 375.97397 m/z.
3.3. Study of Inhibition of Photosynthetic Electron Transport (PET) in Spinach Chloroplasts
Chloroplasts were prepared from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) according to Masarovicova and
Kralova [49]. The inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in spinach chloroplasts was
determined spectrophotometrically (Genesys 6, Thermo Scientific, USA), using an artificial electron
acceptor 2,6-dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCIPP) according to Kralova et al. [50], and the rate of
photosynthetic electron transport was monitored as photoreduction of DCPIP. The measurements
were carried out in phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 7.2) containing sucrose (0.4 M), MgCl2 (0.005 M) and
NaCl (0.015 M). The chlorophyll content was 30 mg/L in these experiments, and the samples were
irradiated (~100 W/m2 with 10 cm distance) with a halogen lamp (250 W) using a 4-cm water filter
to prevent warming of the samples (suspension temperature 22 ◦C). The studied compounds were
dissolved in DMSO due to their limited water solubility. The applied DMSO concentration (up to 4%)
practically did not affect the photochemical activity in spinach chloroplasts. The inhibitory efficiency of
the studied compounds was expressed by IC50 values, i.e., by molar concentration of the compounds
causing a 50% decrease in the oxygen evolution rate relative to the untreated control. The comparable
IC50 value for a selective herbicide 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, DCMU (Diuron®, Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany) was about 1.9 µM. The results are summarized in Table 1.
3.4. Study of Fluorescence of Chlorophyll a and Aromatic Amino Acids in Spinach Chloroplasts
The fluorescence emission spectra of chlorophyll a (Chla) and aromatic amino acids in spinach
chloroplasts were recorded on fluorescence spectrophotometer F-2000 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using
excitation wavelength
λ
ex
= 436 nm for monitoring the fluorescence of Chla and
λ
ex
= 275 nm for
monitoring the fluorescence of aromatic amino acids, excitation slit 20 nm and emission slit 10 nm.
The samples were kept in the dark for 2 min prior to the measurement. The phosphate buffer used for
dilution of the chloroplast suspension was the same as described above. Due to low aqueous solubility,
the compounds were added to a chloroplast suspension in DMSO solution. The DMSO concentration
in all samples was the same as in the control (10%). The chlorophyll concentration in chloroplast
suspension was 10 mg/L.
4. Conclusions
Series of seventeen new di- and trichlorinated and brominated 1-hydroxynaphthalene-
2-carboxanilides was prepared and characterized. These compounds were completed by seven
recently published unsubstituted and monochlorinated and brominated derivatives, and all the
compounds were tested for their in vitro activity related to the inhibition of photosynthetic
electron transport (PET) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-(13),

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
10 of 12
N-(4-bromo-3-chlorophenyl)-(24), N-(2,5-dibromophenyl)-(18) and 1-hydroxy-N-(3,4,5-trichloro-
phenyl)naphthalene-2-carboxamide (16) were the most potent PET inhibitors with IC50 = 5.2, 6.7,
7.6 and 8.0
higher potency than the bromine derivatives. The inhibitory activity of these compounds depends on
the position and the type of halogen substituents, e.g., all 2,4-disubstituted compounds 17 21 22 and
2,3-disubstituted compound showed limited aqueous solubility resulting in moderate PET-inhibiting
µM, respectively. In general, it can be stated that the chlorinated derivatives demonstrated
9
,
,
,
8
activity compared with that of 2,5-, 2,6-, 3,4- or 3,5-disubstituted derivatives or other investigated
compounds. It can be stated that the PET inhibition increases with increasing lipophilicity for mono-
and disubstituted analogues, while an opposite trend is observed for trisubstituted derivatives. Thus,
it seems that for PET-inhibiting activity, a lipophilicity optimum is in the range of log P from 6.01 to
6.28. On the other hand, the PET inhibition decreases with increasing electron-withdrawing properties
of individual anilides, and this trend is similar for all the series. Interactions of the studied compounds
with chlorophyll a and aromatic amino acids present in pigment–protein complexes mainly in PS
II were documented by fluorescence spectroscopy. The section between P680 and plastoquinone QB
in the PET chain occurring on the acceptor side of PS II can be suggested as the site of action of
the compounds.
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (Grant No.
APVV-0516-12) and VEGA 1/0770/15. The HPLC/HRMS system forms a part of the National Infrastructure
CzeCOS ProCES CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001609; Michal Oravec was supported by the National Sustainability
Program (NPU I; Grant No. LO1415).
Author Contributions: Tomas Gonec, Jiri Kos, Josef Jampilek: design, synthesis of the compounds, SAR, writing
of the paper. Michal Oravec, Jana Dohanosova, Tibor Liptaj: analysis/characterization of the compounds.
Matus Pesko and Katarina Kralova: PET evaluation.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Draber, W.; Tietjen, K.; Kluth, J.F.; Trebst, A. Herbicides in photosynthesis research. Angew. Chem. 1991, 3,
1621–1633. [CrossRef]
Tischer, W.; Strotmann, H. Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition of
photosynthetic electron-transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1977, 460, 113–125. [CrossRef]
Trebst, A.; Draber, W. Structure activity correlations of recent herbicides in photosynthetic reactions.
In Advances in Pesticide Science; Greissbuehler, H., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1979; pp. 223–234.
Bowyer, J.R.; Camilleri, P.; Vermaas, W.F.J. Herbicides, Topics in Photosynthesis; Baker, N.R., Percival, M.P., Eds.;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 27–85.
Izawa, S. Acceptors and donors for chloroplast electron transport. In Methods in Enzymology; Part C;
Colowick, P., Kaplan, N.O., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980; pp. 413–434.
Whitmarsh, J. Electron transport and energy transduction. In Photosynthesis: A Comprehensive Treatise;
Raghavendra, A.S., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998; pp. 87–110.
Huppatz, J.L.; McFadden, H.G. Understanding the topography of the photosystem II herbicide binding
niche: Does QSAR help? Z. Naturforsch. 1993, 48, 140–145.
Lambreva, M.D.; Russo, D.; Polticelli, F.; Scognamiglio, V.; Antonacci, A.; Zobnina, V.; Campi, G.; Rea, G.
Structure/function/dynamics of photosystem II plastoquinone binding sites. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2014, 15,
285–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Trebst, A. Inhibitors in the functional dissection of the photosynthetic electron transport system.
Photosynth Res. 2007, 92, 217–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Teixeira, R.R.; de Andrade Barros, M.V.; Bressan, G.C.; Siqueira, R.P.; Dos Santos, F.S.; Bertazzini, M.; Kiralj, R.;
Ferreira, M.M.C.; Forlani, G. Synthesis, theoretical studies, and effect on the photosynthetic electron transport
of trifluoromethyl arylamides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Gonec, T.; Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Tengler, J.; Bobal, P.; Kollar, P.; Cizek, A.;
Kralova, K.; et al. Antimycobacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted 1-hydroxynaphthalene-
2-carboxanilides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6531–6541. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
11 of 12
12. Kralova, K.; Perina, M.; Waisser, K.; Jampilek, J. Structure-activity relationships of N-benzylsalicylamides for
inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport. Med. Chem. 2015, 11, 156–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Kralova, K.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Photosynthesis-inhibiting
efficiency of 4-chloro-2-(chlorophenylcarbamoyl)phenyl alkyl-carbamates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21,
4564–4567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Pattabiraman, V.R.; Bode, J.W. Rethinking amide bond synthesis. Nature 2011, 480, 471–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Ghosh, A.K.; Brindisi, M. Organic carbamates in drug design and medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015
,
58, 2895–2940. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Gonec, T.; Zadrazilova, I.; Nevin, E.; Kauerova, T.; Pesko, M.; Kos, J.; Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.;
O’Mahony, J.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of N-alkoxyphenyl-3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-
carboxanilides. Molecules 2015, 20, 9767–9787. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Teixeira, R.R.; Pereira, J.L.; Pereira, W.L. Photosynthetic inhibitors. In Applied Photosynthesis; Najafpour, M.,
Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 3–22.
18. Dolezal, M.; Zitko, J.; Osicka, Z.; Kunes, J.; Vejsova, M.; Buchta, V.; Dohnal, J.; Jampilek, J.;
Kralova, K. Synthesis, antimycobacterial, antifungal and photosynthesis-inhibiting activity of chlorinated
N-phenylpyrazine-2-carboxamides. Molecules 2010, 15, 8567–8581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Kralova, K.; Vejsova, M.; Stolarikova, J.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Investigating
spectrum of biological activity of 4- and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[2-(arylamino)-1-alkyl-2-oxoethyl]-
benzamides. Molecules 2011, 16, 2414–2430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Sujan, J.; Pesko, M.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.; Pavlacka, L.; Vesely, L.; Kreckova, E.; Kos, J.; et al.
Investigating the spectrum of biological activity of substituted quinoline-2-caboxamides and their isosteres.
Molecules 2012, 17, 613–644. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Tengler, J.; Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Kauerova, T.;
Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.; et al. Antibacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted 3-hydroxynaphthalene-
2-carboxanilides. Molecules 2013, 18, 7977–7997. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Gonec, T.; Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Govender, R.; Keltosova, S.; Chambel, B.; Pereira, D.; Kollar, P.;
Imramovsky, A.; et al. Antibacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted 2-hydroxynaphthalene-
1-carboxanilides. Molecules 2013, 18, 9397–9419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Jampilek, J.; Kralova, K.; Pesko, M.; Kos, J. Ring-substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxanilides as
photosystem II inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 3862–3865.
24. Fajkusova, D.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Guo, J.; Oktabec, Z.; Vejsova, M.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.;
Csollei, J.; Kralova, K.; et al. Anti-infective and herbicidal activity of N-substituted 2-aminobenzothiazoles.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 7059–7068. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Pauk, K.; Zadrazilova, I.; Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Pokorna, M.; Masarikova, M.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J.
New derivatives of salicylamides: Preparation and antimicrobial activity against various bacterial species.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6574–6581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Kos, J.; Nevin, E.; Soral, M.; Kushkevych, I.; Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.; O’Mahony, J.;
Liptaj, T.; et al. Synthesis and antimycobacterial properties of ring-substituted 6-hydroxynaphthalene-
2-carboxanilides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 2035–2043. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Nevin, E.; Soral, M.; Gonec, T.; Kollar, P.; Oravec, M.; Coffey, A.; O’Mahony, J.;
Liptaj, T.; et al. Ring-Substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxanilides as potential antimycobacterial agents.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 4188–4196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Gonec, T.; Kralova, K.; Pesko, M.; Jampilek, J. Antimycobacterial N-alkoxyphenylhydroxynaphthalene-
carboxamides affecting photosystem II. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 1881–1885. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Otevrel, J.; Mandelova, Z.; Pesko, M.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Vejsova, M.; Kalinowski, D.;
Kovacevic, Z.; Coffey, A.; et al. Investigating the spectrum of biological activity of ring-substituted
salicylanilides and carbamoylphenylcarbamates. Molecules 2010, 15, 8122–8142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Zadrazilova, I.; Pospisilova, S.; Masarikova, M.; Imramovsky, A.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Vinsova, J.; Cizek, A.;
Jampilek, J. Salicylanilide carbamates: Promising antibacterial agents with high in vitro activity against
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 77, 197–207. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Gonec, T.; Pospisilova, S.; Kauerova, T.; Kos, J.; Dohanosova, J.; Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.; Liptaj, T.;
Cizek, A.; et al. N-Alkoxyphenylhydroxynaphthalenecarboxamides and their antimycobacterial activity.
Molecules 2016, 21, 1068. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Molecules 2017, 22, 1709
12 of 12
32. Gonec, T.; Pospisilova, S.; Holanova, L.; Stranik, J.; Cernikova, A.; Pudelkova, V.; Kos, J.; Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.;
Cizek, A.; et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of 1-[(2-substituted phenyl)carbamoyl]naphthalen-
2-yl carbamates. Molecules 2016, 21, 1189. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Gonec, T.; Stranik, J.; Pesko, M.; Kos, J.; Oravec, M.; Kralova, K.; Jampilek, J. Photosynthesis-inhibiting activity
of 1-[(2-chlorophenyl)carbamoyl]- and 1-[(2-nitrophenyl)carbamoyl]naphthalen-2-yl alkylcarbamates.
Molecules 2017, 22, 1199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Vettorazzi, M.; Angelina, E.; Lima, S.; Gonec, T.; Otevrel, J.; Marvanova, P.; Padrtová, T.; Mokry, P.; Bobal, P.;
Acosta, L.M.; et al. Search of new structural scaffolds for sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2017, 139, 461–481. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Jampilek, J. Potential of agricultural fungicides for antifungal drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Dis. 2016
11, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
,
36. Xiao, R.; Ghosh, S.; Tanaka, A.R.; Greenberg, B.M.; Dumbroff, E.B. A rapid spectrophotometric method for
measuring photosystem I and photosystem II in a single sample. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1997, 35, 411–417.
37. Sersen, F.; Kralova, K.; Macho, V. New findings about the inhibitory action of phenylcarbamates and
phenylthiocarbamates on photosynthetic apparatus. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2000, 68, 113–118. [CrossRef]
38. Rashid, A.; Popovic, R. Electron donation to photosystem II by diphenylcarbazide is inhibited both by the
endogenous manganese complex and by exogenous manganese ions. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 1995, 73, 241–245.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Jegerschold, C.; Styring, S. Fast oxygen-independent degradation of the Dl reaction centre protein in
photosystem II. FEBS Lett. 1991, 280, 87–90. [CrossRef]
40. Purcell, M.; Leroux, G.; Carpentier, R. Interaction of the electron donor diphenylcarbazide with the
herbicide-binding niche of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Int. J. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 1058,
374–378. [CrossRef]
41. Borse, T.H.; Maheswarim, V.L.; Baviskar, M.P. Effect of diphenyl carbazide on the metribuzin induced
inhibition of photosystem-II photochemistry. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechn. 2000, 9, 119–121. [CrossRef]
42. Servusova, B.; Eibinova, D.; Dolezal, M.; Kubicek, V.; Paterova, P.; Pesko, M.; Kralova, K. Substituted
N-benzylpyrazine-2-carboxamides: Synthesis and biological evaluation. Molecules 2012, 17, 13183–13198.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Govindjee, A. Sixty-three years since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 22,
131–160. [CrossRef]
44. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Kubicova, L.; Waisser, K. Inhibitory effects of substituted benzanilides on
photosynthetic electron transport in spinach chloroplasts. Chem. Pap. 1999, 53, 328–331. [CrossRef]
45. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Pesko, M.; Waisser, K.; Kubicova, L. 5-Bromo- and 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxy-
N-phenylbenzamides—Inhibitors of photosynthesis. Chem. Pap. 2014, 68, 46–52. [CrossRef]
46. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Miletin, M.; Hartl, J. Inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport by some anilides
of 2-alkylpyridine-4-carboxylic acids in spinach chloroplasts. Chem. Pap. 1998, 52, 52–58. [CrossRef]
47. Jandourek, O.; Dolezal, M.; Paterova, P.; Kubicek, V.; Pesko, M.; Kunes, J.; Coffey, A.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.
N-Substituted 5-amino-6-methylpyrazine-2,3-dicarbonitriles: Microwave-assisted synthesis and biological
properties. Molecules 2014, 19, 651–671. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Jampilek, J.; Kralova, K. Synthesis and photosynthetic electron transport
inhibition of 2-substituted 6-fluorobenzothiazoles. Monatsh. Chem. 2014, 145, 1817–1824. [CrossRef]
49. Masarovicova, E.; Kralova, K. Approaches to measuring plant photosynthesis activity. In Handbook of
Photosynthesis, 2nd ed.; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 617–656.
50. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Sidoova, E. Photosynthesis inhibition produced by 2-alkylthio-6-R-benzothiazoles.
Chem. Pap. 1992, 46, 348–350.
Sample Availability: Samples of compounds 1–24 are available from author T. Gonec.
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).