Tebbe’s reagent in the presence of DMAP and trimethyl
phosphine.16 If the amount of THF is limited, however, to
the minimal amount required for solubility (toluene/THF,
3:2), the reaction affords the enol ether 9 (4:1 ratio of 9/10)
in a 40-50% yield after flash chromatography and distilla-
tion.
Table 1. Cycloadditions of Methylene-1,3-dioxolanes
With these enol ethers in hand, we began examining their
reactivity with o-QMs. When the known benzyl alcohol 1617
(0.1 M in toluene, -78 °C, 2-4 equiv of the 1,3-dihy-
droisobenzofuran enol ether 4) is treated with t-BuMgCl, an
endo-selective cycloaddition proceeds as the reaction mixture
slowly warms to room temperature (Scheme 2). The reaction
cleanly produces the chroman spiroketal 17 in 60% isolated
Scheme 2. Some [4 + 2] Cycloadditions of Benzofurans and
an o-QM
speculate that the product 21 has the stereochemistry shown,
which reflects a reaction proceeding through an endo
orientation on the face opposite of phenyl residues at R1 and
R3. Next, we examined the corresponding reaction of enol
ether 7 and benzyl alcohol 2019 using similar conditions.
Again, 1H NMR revealed formation of 22 as a single
diastereomer (>20:1). This result suggested to us that the
presence of an R1 substituent was sufficient to control the
diastereoselectivity of the reaction. Thus, we were not
altogether surprised that use of the enol ether 8, which
expresses a substituted aryl ring, undergoes a diastereose-
lective reaction with the o-QM derived from 16 in compa-
rable ratio and yield.
1
yield (>8:1 dr by crude H NMR). This transformation,
therefore, serves as a practical model for an eventual
synthetic strategy aimed toward (+)-paecilospirone (3).
We next examined a similar cycloaddition using the enol
ether 5. The 2-methylbenzofuran 18 is produced along with
a small amount of the desired chroman spiroketal 19 in 10%
yield. Presumably, the fragile 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran enol
ether 5 succumbs to isomerization under these conditions.18
Therefore, due to the low yield for this transformation, we
sought an alternative strategy for the construction of 1 by
investigating o-QM cycloadditions with the enol ethers 6-8.
The starting benzyl alcohol 16 (0.1 M in Et2O at -78 °C,
2 equiv of 6) was subjected again to t-BuMgCl (Table 1). A
cycloaddition occurs as the mixture slowly warms to room
temperature, affording a single diastereomer as determined
With the chroman spiroketal 23 in hand, we paused to
investigate its reformulation into the corresponding benzo-
furan spiro-adduct (Scheme 3). The benzyl ether in 23 (0.5
Scheme 3. Failed Attempts to Effect Trans-Ketalization
1
by crude H NMR (45% isolated yield of 21). On the basis
of our extensive experience with these cycloadditions, we
(14) Payack, J. F.; Hughes, D. L.; Cai, D.; Cottrell, I. F.; Verhoeven, T.
R. Org. Synth. 2002, 79, 19.
M in 95% EtOH) was cleaved in nearly quantitative yield
by exposure of the heterogeneous mixture containing 5%
Pd/C to a hydrogen atmosphere to provide phenol 24.
Subsequent treatment of 24 with various proton sources, as
well as a cadre of Lewis acids, failed to afford the desired
spiro-adduct 26 (via 25). In most instances, the starting
material remained unchanged or suffered decomposition.
The resiliency of the chroman spiroketal 24 and related
structures is appreciated through an understanding of reso-
nance effects. The lone pair of electrons on the chroman
oxygen is delocalized throughout the adjoining aromatic ring.
Therefore, it is difficult for the lone pair of electrons to assist
(15) For reactions of the Petasis reagent with nitriles, see: (a) Petasis,
N. A.; Fu, D.-K. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3776. (b) Barluenga, J.; del
Poso Lasada, C.; Olano, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7579. (c) Treatment
of phenylacetonitrile with Petasis’ reagent smoothly affords 1-phenylacetone
in 75% yield. Thus, this mild nitrile-to-ketone transformation appears general
and proceeds in better yields with less complicated examples.
(16) (a) Doxsee, K. M.; Farahi, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7239.
(b) Takeda, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 195. (c) Doxsee, K. M.;
Farahi, J. B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 20, 1452.
(17) (a) Marsini, M. A.; Huang, Y.; Van De Water, R. W.; Pettus, T. R.
R. Org. Lett. 2007, 7, 3229. (b) Lindsey, C. C.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 201.
(18) (a) Zhou, G.; Zheng, D.; Da, S.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 3349.
(19) Hoarau, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2843.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 7, 2008
1479