C. P. Kordik et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 2287–2290
Table 3. Data from rat feeding modela
2289
Experimental groups compared to
control group
Drug
(IP)
Dose
(mg/kg)
2 h
(g)
4 h
(g)
6 h
(g)
2–6 h
(g)
Scheme 2. Reagents: (a) NaOEt, diethyl oxalate, Et2O, 0 ꢀC; (b)
R1NHNH2, H2SO4, H2O, CHCl3; (c) NaOH, EtOH, H2O; (d) HATU,
DIPEA, R2NH2, CH2Cl2.
PEG-200
(N=24)
Fluoxetine
0
AVG=
SE=
AVG=
SE=
8.63
12.3
18.8
10.2
0.398
4.38*
0.294
0.53
7.25*
0.479
0.756
12.6*
0.648
0.59
8.25*
0.512
10
(N=24)
11
%CH= À49.2
À41.06 À32.98 À19.12
Since the aminopyrazoles such as 1 and 2 were very
active,24 we also prepared hybrid structures of that ser-
ies and the one reported in this paper. These derivatives
were obtained as illustrated in Scheme 2, involving the
reaction of the anion of acetonitrile with diethyl oxalate,
followed by formation of the pyrazole from the resul-
tant intermediate by treatment with an aryl hydrazine.
The pyrazole ester was then saponified with aqueous
sodium hydroxide, and the acid that formed coupled to
appropriate amines using standard peptide coupling
procedures.
p=
AVG=
SE=
<0.01
5.31*
0.538
<0.01
9.44*
0.652
<0.01
13.9*
0.856
<0.05
8.56
0.612
30
(N=16)
%CH= À38.47 À23.25 À26.06 À16.08
p=
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
>0.05
PEG-200
(N=8)
Fluoxetine
0
AVG=
SE=
AVG=
SE=
10.4
16
23.4
13
0.905
4.50*
0.824
0.845
8.25*
1.06
0.778
13.4*
1.82
0.681
8.88*
1.17
10
(N=8)
31
%CH= À56.73 À48.4
À42.74 À31.69
p=
AVG=
SE=
<0.01
6.88*
0.718
<0.01
9.13*
0.934
<0.01
14.6*
1.37
<0.05
7.38*
1.22
30
(N=8)
%CH= À33.85 À42.94 À37.61 À43.23
The best R1 and R2 groups from the pyrazole carbox-
amide series were incorporated into an aminopyrazole
scaffold to provide 34 and 35 (Fig. 3). Both of these
compounds had substantially decreased affinity for Y5
(>1000 and 400 nM IC50’s, respectively).
p= <0.05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
%CH, % change; * signifies statistical significance.
aMale Long–Evans rats were fasted for 18 h prior to testing. At the
end of the fasting period, animals were administered either the test
compound or vehicle 30 min intraperitoneally prior to the experiment.
The test compounds were administered as a solution or suspension in
PEG 200. Food consumption was determined at 2, 4, and 6 h after
administration by weighing the special jar containing the food before
the experiment and at each specified time.
Compounds 11 and 31 were tested in a fasting-induced
feeding model in rats.20,25 Both compounds were admi-
nistered ip and compared to vehicle (PEG-200) and
reference compound (fluoxetine). They caused statisti-
cally significant decreases in food consumption relative
to fluoxetine as control (Table 3), and both were well
tolerated. Since NPY was not added initially to enhance
feeding, it is not possible to know whether this reduc-
tion of feeding is entirely mediated by an interaction
with the NPY Y5 receptor. Neither compound was
active upon oral administration.
be seen for NPY Y5 receptor antagonists, even when
exogenous NPY is not added to amplify NPY-induced
feeding.
Acknowledgements
We describe here another related class of compounds,
pyrazole carboxamides, which modulate the human
NPY5 receptor. The compound resulting from the
combination of the best R1 (3-trifluoromethyl) and R2
substituents (5-isoquinolinyl) was 31. This compound
and an additional member of this series (11) decreased
fasting-induced feeding in a rodent model upon ip
administration, indicating that they may be useful for
the treatment of human feeding disorders and obesity,
especially if suitable compounds can be found that are
orally bioavailable. The antifeedant activity seen for 11
and 31 are additional examples in which this effect can
We thank our colleagues for their helpful advice and
encouragement, specifically Scott Dax, Carlos Plata-
Salaman, Richard Shank, Jim McNally, Mark Young-
man, Barry Dubinsky, and Coralie Hochman.
References and Notes
1. Clark, J. T.; Kalra, P. S.; Crowley, W. R.; Kalra, S. P.
Endocrinology 1984, 115, 427.
2. Levine, A. S.; Morley, J. E. Peptides 1984, 5, 1025.
3. Stanley, B. G.; Leibowitz, S. F. Life Sci. 1984, 35, 2635.
4. Stanley, B. G.; Leibowitz, S. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1985, 82, 3940.
5. Wahlestedt, C.; Grundemar, L.; Hakanson, R.; Heilig, M.;
Shen, G. H.; Zukowska-Grojec, Z.; Reis, D. J. Ann. N.Y.
Acad. Sci. 1990, 611, 7.
6. Larhammar, D.; Blomqvist, A. G.; Yee, F.; Jazin, E.; Yoo,
H.; Wahlestedt, C. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 10935.
7. Wahlestedt, C.; Yanaihara, N.; Hakanson, R. Regul. Pept.
1986, 13, 307.
8. Fuhlendorf, J. U.; Gether, U.; Aakerlund, L.; Langeland-
Johansen, N.; Thoegersen, H.; Melberg, S. G.; Olsen, U. B.;
Thastrup, O.; Schwartz, T. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1990, 87, 182.
Figure 3. Aminopyrazole carboxamides.