Table 1. Synthesis of Compounds 2a-j
Table 2. Isolated Yields of 3a-j and 4a-j
entry
product
Ar
yield %a
ee %
% yield % yield % yield
entry reactant
Ar
of 3a
of 3b
of 4b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
C6H5
95
96
98
93
96
96
95
97
97
90
75d
92c
88c
1
2
3
4
5
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
C6H5
61
63
62
61
63
61
65
62
62
58
15
18
14
15
15
16
14
14
11
13
20
16
16
20
15
14
18
10
12
18
4-F-C6H4
4-Cl-C6H4
4-F-C6H4
4-Cl-C6H4
3,4-(OCH3)-C6H3
3-CH3-C6H4
4-(OCH3)-C6H4
4-NO2-C6H4
2-Cl-C6H4
4-CN-C6H4
2-naphthyl
3-indolyl
94c
94b
92c
94b
3,4-(OCH3)-C6H3
3-CH3-C6H4
4-(OCH3)-C6H4
4-NO2-C6H4
2-Cl-C6H4
6
7
8
9
2g
2h
2i
9
80c
4-CN-C6H4
2-naphthyl
10
11
12
2j
2k
2l
10
2j
a Yields obtained after filtration. b Yields obtained from the mother liquor
2-furyl
a Isolated yields. b Determined using Chiral HPLC analysis using a
Chiralcel-AD column, 10% isopropanol in n-heptane as an eluent.
c Determined using Chiral HPLC analysis using a Chiralcel-OJ column,
10% isopropanol in n-heptane as an eluent. d Obtained using 1 equiv of
OsO4 in pyridine.
using column chromatography.
alkenes were used.21 For this reason, the development of
alternative and practical methods for the preparation of
functionalized ∆2 isoxazolines continues to be an attractive
subject of research.22,23 In this context, we decided to develop
a one-pot procedure to convert isoxazoles 1 to ∆2 isoxazo-
lines 3 that involved sequential dihydroxylation–reduction.
Considering that compounds 1 could be easily prepared from
commercially available 3,5-dimethyl-4-nitroisoxazole and an
aromatic aldehyde,24 this procedure would furnish a rapid
and practical entry to potentially bioactive compounds. It
was recognized that dihydroxylation and reduction could be
run in one pot provided that (a) conversion of 2 to 3 does
not require protection of the hydroxyls; (b) the reducing agent
is compatible with the presence of small quantities of OsO4.
In order to find an optimal set of conditions, the conversions
of 1 to 2 (Table 1) and of 2 to 3 (Table 2) were independently
studied.
nary Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation13 and the result-
ing dihydroxyisoxazoles 2 converted to dihydroxyisoxazo-
lines 3 by partial reduction of the 4-nitroisoxazole core. In
this context, the Sharpless dihydroxylation reaction would
serve as a means to functionalize the exocyclic alkene in 1
and to set the absolute stereochemistry in the final compounds
6. We have extensively studied the reactivity of 4-nitro-5-
styrylisoxazoles toward nucleophiles.1–7 On the basis of these
studies, we anticipated the 4-nitroisoxazole moiety in 2 would
undergo reaction to give ∆2 isoxazolines 3 when reacted with
a suitable metal hydride. ∆2 Isoxazolines are medicinally
relevant compounds that possess a plethora of biological
activities including antibacterial,14 antiplatelet,15 antiviral,16
anticonvulsant,17 immunostimulatory,18 and antihyperten-
sive.19 ∆2 Isoxazolines are also valuable building blocks for
the preparation of ꢀ-hydroxy carbonyls or ꢀ-aminoalcohols.20
The conventional method of preparation of ∆2 isoxazolines
involves a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of nitrile oxides to
alkenes. This reaction is highly regioselective. However, high
asymmetric induction could be observed only when chiral
In a test experiment, we reacted 5-styryl-4-nitroisoxazole
1a (Table 1) with a catalytic amount of OsO4 (0.05 equiv),
DHQD2Phal (0.1 equiv), and an excess (2.2 equiv) of
N-methylmorpholine (NMO).
Under these conditions, dihydroxyisoxazole 2a was ob-
tained in high yield and enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry
1). The conversion of 1a to 2a was studied in various solvents
including pyridine and mixtures of tBuOH/H2O, EtOH/H2O,
MeOH/H2O, (CH3)2CO/H2O, and THF/H2O. This study
identified mixtures of THF/H2O (10:1 or 20:1) as the optimal
medium. Similarly, 4-nitro-5-styrylisoxazoles 1b-j contain-
ing a substituted phenyl ring were converted to the corre-
(13) Hartmuth, C.; Kolb, M.; VanNieuwenhze, S.; Sharpless, K. B.
Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2483–2547.
(14) Kang, Y. K.; Shin, K. J.; Yoo, K. H.; Seo, K. J.; Hong, C. Y.; Lee,
C.; Park, S. Y.; Kim, D. J.; Park, S. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000,
10, 95–103.
(15) Xue, C.; Roderick, J.; Mousa, S.; Olson, R. E.; DeGrado, W. F.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 3499–3509.
(16) Diana, G. D.; McKinlay, M. A.; Brisson, C. J.; Zalay, E. S.;
Miralles, J. V.; Salvador, U. J. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 748–759.
(17) Lepage, F.; Tombert, F.; Cuvier, G.; Marivain, A.; Gillardin, J. M.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 27, 581–588.
(21) Lee, C. K. Y.; Herlt, A. J.; Simpson, G. W.; Willis, A. C.; Easton,
C. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3221–3231
(22) Kumar, R. R.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12220–12231
(23) Kaffy, J.; Pontikis, R.; Carrez, D.; Croisy, A.; Monneret, C.; Florent,
.
(18) Ryng, S.; Machon, Z.; Wieczorek, Z.; Zimecki, M.; Mokrosz, M.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 33, 831–835.
.
(19) Dallanoce, C.; Meroni, G.; De Amici, M.; Hoffman, C.; Klotz, K.-
N.; De Micheli, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4393–4401.
(20) Bode, J. W.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1587–1590.
J.-C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4067–4077.
(24) Adamo, M. F. A.; Duffy, E. F.; Konda, V. R.; Murphy, F.
Heterocycles 2007, 71, 1173–1181.
1808
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 9, 2008