practical method used for the primary alcohols. On the other
hand, the rearrangement of the corresponding propargyl esters
has also been investigated.1b While Zhang’s group developed
Au-catalyzed reactions under mild conditions, which gave
good yields of the products,9 Nishizawa and co-workers
demonstrated an example of the efficient 1,3-rearrangement
of the primary propargyl esters using Hg(OTf)2.10 However,
the 1,3-rearrangement of the propagyl alcohols is still more
advantageous from the perspective of the atom economy and
synthetic aspects. Herein, we describe a novel and practical
method by the combined use of Mo, Au, and Ag compounds,
which dramatically accelerates the 1,3-rearrangement even
at room temperature and affords a diverse range of R,ꢀ-
unsaturated carbonyl compounds in good to excellent yields.
First, to develop a more effective catalytic system, a highly
challenging primary propargyl alcohol 1a was used as the
substrate. When the rearrangement of 1a was carried out in
CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 1 h, no observable reaction
occurred in the presence of only the Mo, Au, or Ag catalyst
(entries 2-4, Table 1). Moreover, all combinations of two
oxo-metal compounds and gold catalysts, MoO2(acac)2 and
AuCl(PPh3) were determined to be the most effective for
generating 2a. No significant difference in efficiency was
noted among the silver catalysts such as AgOTf, AgClO4,
AgBF4, and AgPF6, all of which produced 2a in NMR yields
between 84 and 92%. The screening of solvents also revealed
that toluene and CH2Cl2 showed comparable effects, although
toluene was somewhat superior (99% as measured by NMR).
Next, the reactivity of diverse propargyl alcohols was tested
using the combination of 1 mol % each of MoO2(acac)2,
AuCl(PPh3), and AgOTf in toluene at room temperature. The
results are depicted in Table 2. Our protocol showed an excellent
generality and provided good to excellent isolated yields of
unsaturated ketones 2a-n from primary, secondary, and tertiary
propargyl alcohols 1a-n. The time required to reach completion
was typically less than 1 h, while 3 h was sufficient for the less
reactive tertiary substrates 1i-m. Furthermore, the oxidation
of a hydroxyl group did not occur at all.3 Even in the case when
the catalyst loading was reduced to 0.5 mol %, excellent yields
were obtained, although a slightly longer reaction time was
needed (entries 2 and 4). Besides, the rearrangement of
secondary propargyl alcohols 1d-g produced ꢀ-monosubsti-
tuted compounds 2d-g with a high E-selectivity (entries 6-9).
Entries 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 14 show that the yields are higher
and the times are shorter than the reactions conducted with
Hg(OTf)2,10a AgOMs,8 NaAuCl4·2H2O,7a or Bu4NReO4.5 It is
notable that our method has an advantage over the previous
applications, especially for the primary propargyl alcohol.
The developed method was also useful for the rearrange-
ment of the propargyl alcohols bearing proton 1o-p, oxygen
1q-r, and nitrogen groups 1s at the end of the acetylene
functionality to give the R,ꢀ-unsaturated aldehydes 2o,p, the
phenyl esters 2q,r,11 and the amide 2s, respectively. In these
cases, the choice of a proper solvent brought about high
yields of the products. To the best of our knowledge, this is
the first example of the 1,3-rearrangement of the N-alkynyl
amide, and 2s was produced with complete E-selectivity. The
substrates (1o and 1p) were conveniently prepared by the
reaction of carbonyl compounds with ethynylmagnesium
bromide. Similarly, the preparation of 1q-s was also
effectively achieved by the reaction of the lithiated phe-
noxyacetylene 3a12 or the lithiated N-substituted ynamine
3b13 with aldehydes or ketones (Table 3).
Table 1. Preliminary Survey for the Rearrangement of 1aa
entry MoO2(acac)2 AuCl(PPh3) AgOTf NMR yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
92
0
0
0
4
25
0
a +: with, -: without. b NMR yield using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as
the internal standard.
catalysts among them afforded no or poor yields of the
desired compound 2a (entries 5-7). However, in stark
contrast, the use of all these catalysts showed a significant
improvement in the rate and the yield of 2a. That is, the
reaction was completed within 1 h to provide 2a in 92%
yield (entry 1). Subsequently, the effect of each metal catalyst
on this reaction was further surveyed. Among a variety of
R,ꢀ-Unsaturated aldehydes, esters, and amides have so
far been synthesized by the aldol condensation,14 Wittig
and Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reactions,15 and Peter-
son reaction.16 For the aldol reactions, either an acidic or
a basic catalyst was required, and self-condensation often
(6) (a) Suzuki, T.; Tokunaga, M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 7531. (b) Cadierno, V.; Garc´ıa-Garrido, S. E.; Gimeno, J. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2006, 348, 101.
(11) We found that the rearrangement of the corresponding ethoxyethy-
nyl derivative using AgOTf (1 mol %) alone was completed at room
temperature for 0.5 h; however, that of 1q with AgOTf (2 mol %) alone
gave 2q in less than 5% NMR yields. Thus, the trimetallic catalytic system
was revealed to be highly effective for less activated alkynes. For details,
see Supporting Information.
(7) (a) Georgy, M.; Boucard, V.; Campagne, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 14180. (b) Lopez, S. S.; Engel, D. A.; Dudley, G. B. Synlett
2007, 949. (c) Lee, S. I.; Baek, J. Y.; Sim, S. H.; Chung, Y. K. Synthesis
2007, 2107.
(8) Sugawara, Y.; Yamada, W.; Yoshida, S.; Ikeno, T.; Yamada, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12902.
(12) Bru¨ckner, D. Synlett 2000, 1402.
(9) (a) Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2147. (b) Yu,
M.; Li, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 871. (c)
Wang, S.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4585.
(13) Zhang, Y.; Hsung, R. P.; Tracey, M. R.; Kurtz, K. C. M.; Vera,
E. L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1151.
(14) Heathcock, C. H. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost,
B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon, Oxford, 1991; Vol. 2, p, 133.
(15) Maryanoff, B. E.; Reitz, A. B. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 863.
(16) Ager, D. J. Org. React. 1990, 38, 1.
(10) (a) Imagawa, H.; Asai, Y.; Takano, H.; Hamagaki, H.; Nishizawa,
M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 447. (b) Nishizawa, M.; Hirakawa, H.; Nakagawa,
Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Namba, K.; Imagawa, H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5577.
1868
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 9, 2008