Rodríguez et al.
Scheme 1
3.62 (s, br, 6H, CH2-N-CH), 2.89 (s, br, 6H, CH2-CH2-N-CH),
2.31 (s, 9H, CH3). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3239 w, br (N-H); 3050 w,
2917 w, 2811 w (C-H); 1639 s, 1624 vs, 1617 s, (indole); 1476 m,
1436 s, 1101 s (PPh3). ESI-MS (CH2Cl2, m/z): 1945.2 (M + H+,
calcd: 1945.4), 1487.8 (M - AuPPh3 + 2H+, calcd: 1487.5), 1410.6
(M - AuPPh3 - Ph + 2H+, calcd: 1410.5), 1029.7 (M - 2AuPPh3
+ 3H+, calcd: 1029.5), 973.4 (M + 2H+, calcd: 972.8), 722.4 (M
- 2AuPPh3 - PPh3 - 3CH3 + 3H+, calcd: 722.6), 649.3 (M +
3H+, calcd: 648.8), 570.7 (InTREN + H+, calcd: 570.7). Anal.
Calcd: C, 55.59; H, 4.20; N, 5.04. Found: C, 55.62; H, 4.25; N,
5.09.
Method B. A dichloromethane solution (4 mL) of [Au(acac)-
PPh3] (55 mg, 0.10 mmol) was added dropwise to a dichlo-
romethane solution (6 mL) of InTREN (19 mg, 0.03 mmol). After
4 h of stirring at room temperature, the solution was filtered through
anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated to a final volume
of 2 mL, and then hexane (6 mL) was added. A pale orange solid
was obtained, filtered, washed with diethyl ether and hexane, and
vacuum-dried. During all the manipulations, the solution was
protected from the light in order to avoid decomposition. Yield:
90%. 31P NMR (CH2Cl2, inset acetone-d6 with 1% POMe3): δ 31.4.
1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 8.35 (s, 3H, CH2-N-CH), 7.89 (s, 3H,
D95V basis set57 for the remaining atoms. Additional f and d
polarization functions were added to Au (Rf ) 0.2) and P (Rf )
0.34), respectively.58
Ground-state structures were optimized without symmetry con-
straints in the gas phase. The time-dependent density functional
theory (TD-DFT) calculations included the solvent effect via the
polarizable continuum model59 using the gas phase geometries.
Twenty-five singlet excited states were calculated. To check the
influence of the basis set, single point TD-DFT calculations with
solvent for compound 3 were repeated using the LanL2DZdp basis
set, which includes polarization and diffuse functions for all the
atoms.60 All calculations have been performed using the B3LYP
functional and the program Gaussian03.61 Gabedit was used to
generate the graphical three-dimensional representations of the
orbitals.62
Synthesis of (InTREN)(AuPPh3)3 (1). Method A. A methanol
solution (2 mL) of InTREN (10 mg, 0.02 mmol) and potassium
hydroxide (4 mg, 0.07 mmol) was stirred at room temperature for
30 min. Then, a dichloromethane solution (2 mL) of AuClPPh3
(26 mg, 0.05 mmol) was added. After 2 h of stirring, the solvent
was concentrated in vacuum to a final volume of 2 mL, and hexane
(6 mL) was added. A pale orange solid was obtained, filtered,
washed with diethyl ether and hexane, and vacuum-dried. During
all the manipulations, the solution was protected from the light in
order to avoid decomposition. Yield: 92%. 31P NMR (CH2Cl2, inset
acetone-d6 with 1% POMe3): δ 31.4. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 8.35 (s,
3H, CH2-N-CH), 7.89 (s, 3H, H1,indole, Scheme 1), 7.52–7.41 (m,
48H, Ph + H4,indole), 6.78 (s, 3H, H2,indole), 6.75 (s, br, 3H, H3,indole),
H
1,indole, Scheme 1), 7.52–7.41 (m, 48H, Ph + H4,indole), 6.78 (s,
3H, H2,indole), 6.75 (s, br, 3H, H3,indole), 3.62 (s, br, 6H,
CH2-N-CH), 2.89 (s, br, 6H, CH2-CH2-N-CH), 2.31 (s, 9H,
CH3). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3239 w, br (N-H); 3050 w, 2917 w, 2811 w
(C-H); 1639 s, 1624 vs, 1617 s, (indole); 1476 m, 1436 s, 1101 s
(PPh3). ESI-MS (CH2Cl2, m/z): 1945.2 (M + H+, calcd: 1945.4),
1487.8 (M - AuPPh3 + 2H+, calcd: 1487.5), 1410.6 (M - AuPPh3
- Ph + 2H+, calcd: 1410.5), 1029.7 (M - 2AuPPh3 + 3H+, calcd:
1029.5), 973.4 (M + 2H+, calcd: 972.8), 722.4 (M - 2AuPPh3 -
PPh3 - 3CH3 + 3H+, calcd: 722.6), 649.3 (M + 3H+, calcd: 648.8),
570.7 (InTREN + H+, calcd: 570.7). Anal. Calcd: C, 55.59; H,
4.20; N, 5.04. Found: C, 55.63; H, 4.26; N, 5.07.
Synthesis of (Triphos)Au3(InTREN) (2). Method A. A metha-
nol solution (4 mL) of InTREN (9 mg, 0.02 mmol) and potassium
hydroxide (4 mg, 0.07 mmol) was stirred at room temperature for
30 min. Then, a dichloromethane solution (3 mL) of (triphos)-
(AuCl)3 (20 mg, 0.02 mmol) was added. A pale orange solid was
obtained after 1 h of stirring. The solid was filtered, washed with
hexane and diethyl ether, and vacuum-dried. During all the
manipulations, the solution was protected from the light in order
to avoid decomposition. Yield: 93%. 31P NMR (CH2Cl2, inset
acetone-d6 with 1% POMe3): δ 17.2. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.31
(s, 3H, CH2-N-CH), 7.99 (s, 3H, H1,indole), 7.78–7.65 (m, 30H,
Ph), 7.62 (s, br, 3H, H4,indole), 7.22 (s, 3H, H2,indole), 6.62 (s, br, 3H,
(54) Bardaji, M.; Calhorda, M. J.; Costa, P. J.; Jones, P. G.; Laguna, A.;
Perez, M. R.; Villacampa, M. D. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 1059–1068.
(55) Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270–283.
(56) Wadt, W. R.; Hay, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 284–298.
(57) Dunning, T. H., Jr.; Hay, P. J. In Modern Theoretical Chemistry;
Schaefer, H. F., III, Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1976.
(58) Pyykko, P.; Runeberg, N.; Mendizabal, F. Chem.sEur. J. 1997, 3,
1451–1457.
(59) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2999–
3093.
H
3,indole), 4.13 (s, br, 6H, CH2-N-CH), 3.50 (s, br, 6H,
(60) Check, C. E.; Faust, T. O.; Bailey, J. M.; Wright, B. J.; Gilbert, T. M.;
Sunderlin, L. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8111–8116.
(61) Frisch, M. J. T. G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa,
J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene,
M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev,
O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala,
P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas,
O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision
C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
CH2-CH2-N-CH), 3.12 (s, br, 6H, CH2-P), 2.32 (s, 9H, CH3),
1.60 (s, 3H, CH3-C-). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3253 w, br (N-H);
3047 w, 2921 w, 2844 w, 2811 w (C-H); 1655 s, 1642 s, 1639 s,
1627 s, 1612 s, 1383 s (indole); 1476 m, 1436 s, 1101 s (PPh2).
ESI-MS (CH2Cl2, m/z): 1782.6 (M + H+, calcd: 1782.4), 892.2
(M + 2H+, calcd: 891.7), 595.2 (M + 3H+, calcd: 594.8). Anal.
Calcd: C, 51.89; H, 4.24; N, 5.50. Found: C, 51.93; H, 4.29; N,
5.54.
Method B. A dichloromethane solution (6 mL) of [{Au(acac)}3-
(triphos)] (25 mg, 0.17 mmol; following the same procedure as for
the PPh3 gold derivative52) was added dropwise to a dichlo-
romethane solution (8 mL) of InTREN (9.4 mg, 0.17 mmol). After
4 h of stirring at room temperature, the solution was filtered through
anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated to a final volume
of 2 mL, and then hexane (8 mL) was added. A pale orange solid
was obtained, filtered, washed with diethyl ether and hexane, and
4954 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 11, 2008