zonitrile and benzyloxymethyltrifluoroborate 2a as our model
electrophile and nucleophile, respectively. We screened a
wide variety of catalyst/ligandcombinations, solvents, bases,
and temperatures.8 Even though several ligands afforded
promising results (Table 2), RuPhos9proved to be the most
During the course of this investigation, our group dem-
onstrated that potassium N,N-dialkylaminomethyltrifluo-
roborates were effective cross-coupling partners with various
aryl- and heteroaryl chlorides.10 Encouraged by these results,
we sought to determine whether our optimized conditions
for the cross-coupling of alkoxymethyltrifluoroborates with
aryl bromides would also be applicable to aryl chlorides.
To our surprise, we obtained comparable or better results
with these electrophiles. Consequently, we utilized the more
stable and less expensive aryl chlorides as the coupling
partner throughout the remainder of the study.
Table 2. Cross-Coupling of 2a and 4-Bromobenzonitrile with
Diverse Ligandsa
Initially, we investigated the cross-coupling of potassium
benzyloxymethyltrifluoroborate (2a) with electron-rich, electron-
neutral, and electron-poor aryl chlorides (Table 3) using the
Table 3. Cross-Coupling of Potassium Benzyloxytrifluoroborate
(2a) with Various Aryl Chloridesa
a All reactions were carried out using 0.5 mmol of 4-bromobenzonitrile
and 0.55 mmol of 2a.
general ligand for the cross-coupling reactions (Table 2, entry
1). The best coupling conditions were determined to be 3
mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 6 mol % of RuPhos, and 10:1 dioxane/
H2O, using Cs2CO3 as the base.
a All reactions were carried out using 0.5 mmol of aryl chloride and
0.55 mmol of 2a.
(3) (a) Majeed, A. J.; Antonsen, O.; Benneche, T.; Undheim, K.
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 993–1006. (b) Ferezou, J. P.; Julia, M.; Li, Y.; Liu,
L. W.; Pancrazi, A. Synlett 1991, 53–56. (c) Kosugi, M.; Sumiya, T.;
Ohhashi, K.; Sano, H.; Migita, T. Chem. Lett. 1985, 997–998. (d) Falck,
J. R.; Patel, P. K.; Bandyopadhyay, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 790–
793.
optimized conditions. The desired alkoxymethylated products
were isolated in good yield in all cases studied. Additionally,
esters, pyrroles, and nitriles were tolerated. Even sterically
hindered electrophiles coupled in good yield (Table 3, entries
2, 3, and 6). Surprisingly, electron-rich products, 3b-e were
obtained in yields comparable to that of the electron-poor
product 3g (Table 3, entries 2-5 and 7).
(4) Matteson, D. S. Sci. Synth. 2004, 6, 607–622.
(5) Molander, G. A.; Ham, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2031–2034.
(6) Tanaka, K.; Inoue, S.; Ito, D.; Murai, N.; Kaburagi, Y.; Shirotori,
S.; Suzuki, S.; Ohashi, Y. Chem. Abstr. 2006, 145, 356920, JP304894,
September 21 2006.
(7) See Supporting Information for the improved procedure to synthesize
potassium bromomethyltrifluoroborate.
(8) Variables changed in coupling optimization included: catalyst/ligand
combinations [PdCl2/PPh3, Pd(TFA)2/PPh3, Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, Pd(OAc)2/XPhos,
Pd(OAc)2/DavePhos, Pd(OAc)2/(o-tolyl)3P, Pd(OAc)2/dppe, Pd(OAc)2/dppb,
PdCl2(dppf) and Peppsi]. Catalyst/ligand ratios: (2/4 mol % and 5/10 mol %);
solvents [THF, toluene, cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), and MeOH]; and
bases (Cs2CO3, K2CO3, CsOH, and NEt3).
(9) Milne, J. E.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13028–
13032.
(10) Molander, G. A.; Gormisky, P. E.; Sandrock, D. L. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 2052–2057.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008
2137