calculations were employed using the Gaussian 03 package.17
Due to the 2:1 ligand-to-metal complexation behavior de-
termined by both mass spectrum and job plot measurements,
the dimers of 1 with and without Cu2+ ion were subjected
to the energy optimization at the B3LYP hydrid functional
with 3-21G* basis set.18 Several different starting geom-
etries were used for the geometry optimization to ensure that
the optimized structures corresponded to a global minima.
The optimized geometry for the monomer of 1 is represented
in Figure S7 (see Supporting Information) and the energy
minimized structures for the dimer of 1 both with (1-Cu2+)
and without the Cu2+ ion are shown in Figure 3.
ion recognition. Overall, the major binding mode in 1-Cu2+
is the electrostatic interaction between Cu2+ and the elec-
tronegative nitrogen atoms in 1, and the van der Waals
interactions between the stacked pyrenes also stabilize the
complex. It is noted that the 1-Cu2+ complex is also stabilized
by two NH---OS hydrogen bonds with an average distance
of 1.85 Å.
In addition, a time-dependent density functional theory
(TDDFT) calculation19 was executed to characterize the
nature of the fluorescence behavior of 1 upon Cu2+ ion
complexation. The molecular orbital energies and the as-
socaited electronic transitions were calculated from the
optimized geometry of the S0 state by TDDFT/B3LYP/3-
21G* level. Several studies,20 including our recent reports,21
have shown that hybrid functionals give the best performance
for evaluating electronic transitions in organic molecules.
On the basis of the TD-B3LYP/B3LYP/3-21G* calculations,
the efficient HOMO-1 to LUMO+1 excitation from one
pyrene and to the other pyrene (Py-Py* interaction) presum-
ably contribute to the strong fluorecence excimer bands for
1-Cu2+, whereas no excimer transitions were found in the
dimer of 1 without Cu2+ ion, as shown in Figures S1 and
S2. In this regard, the experimental observation is in excellent
agreement with the theoretical DFT calculation result that
the excimer emission corresponding to the Cu2+ ion com-
plexation for 1 requires a preorganized cavity with two
proximate nitrogen atoms of the sulfonamide groups to
recognize the metal ion as well as hydrogen bonds to stabilize
the complex.
Figure 3. B3LYP/3-21G* optimized geometries for the dimer of
1 (a) and the dimer of 1 with Cu2+ion (b).
Without the Cu2+ ion, as shown in Figure 3a, two pyrene
groups interact with two benzene groups independently em-
ployed by the π-π interaction.
The resulting dipole moment is to be 0 due to the
symmetry. Two, tight NH---OS hydrogen contacts (1.81 Å)
are present, contributing to the stability of the dimer of 1,
as shown by the dashed line in Figure 3a.
Converseley, the lowest energy conformation for 1-Cu2+
is located with two pyrene groups facing each other, where
the Cu2+ ion is recognized by two nitrogen atoms with a
distance of 1.97 and 1.99Å, respectively (Figure 3b). Four
sulfonamide oxygen atoms also exhibit minor interactions
with the Cu2+ ion (3.31 Å in average).
It is observed that the distance between two nitrogens in
1-Cu2+ ion is 2.88 Å, whereas that in the dimer of 1 without
Cu2+ ion is 4.23 Å. Two nitrogen atoms in proximity of the
sulfonamide groups might be the dominant factor for Cu2+
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Grant
of Korea Research Foundation [KRF-2005-003-C00092], the
SRC Research Center for Women’s Diseases of Sookmyung
Women’s University, and the SRC program (R11-2005-008-
02001-0(2008)).
Note Added after ASAP Publication. The Abstract and
Table of Contents graphics contained errors in the version
published ASAP April 15, 2008; the corrected version was
published on the Web May 8, 2008.
Supporting Information Available: Additional figures of
UV/vis, fluorescence emission spectra, and optimized geometry
for the monomer of 1 (Figure S1-S10). This material is
OL800475D
(19) (a) Gross, E. K. U.; Kohn, W. AdV. Quantum Chem. 1990, 21,
255. (b) Casida, M. E. Recent AdVances in Density Functional Methods,
Part I; Chong, D. P., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 1995; p 155. (c)
Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454.
(20) (a) Tokura, S.; Yagi, K.; Tsuneda, T.; Hirao, K. Chem. Phys. Lett.
2007, 436, 30. (b) Wilberg, K. B.; Stratmannm, R. E.; Frisch, M. J. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1998, 297, 60. (c) Bruel, R.; Amos, R. D.; Handy, N. C. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 2000, 330, 152.
(14) (a) Benesi, H. A.; Hildebrand, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71,
2703. (b) Barra, M.; Bohne, C.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 8075.
(15) Mac´ıas, B.; Villa, M. V.; Go´mez, B.; Borra´s, J.; Alzuet, G.;
Gonza´lez-Alvarez, M.; Castin˜eiras, A. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007, 101, 444.
(16) Bag, B.; Bharadwaj, P. K. J. Lumin. 2007, 126, 27.
(17) Frisch, M. J., et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.:
Wallingford CT, 2004. See Supporting Information for full authors.
(18) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652.
(21) (a) Choi, J. K.; Lee, A.; Kim, S.; Ham, S.; No, K.; Kim, J. S. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 1601. (b) Kim, H. J.; Quang, D. T.; Hong, J.; Kang, G.;
Ham, S.; Kim, J. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 10788.
1966
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008