Synthesis of b-Lactams by 4-exo-tet Cyclization Process
FULL PAPERS
[5] A. D’Annibale, D. Nanni, C. Trogolo, F. Umani, Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 401–402 and references cited therein.
[6] T. Kawabata, T. Minami, T. Hiyama, J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 1864–1873.
[7] O. Kitagawa, N. Kikuchi, T. Hanano, K. Aoki, T. Yama-
zaki, M. Okada, T. Taguchi, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
7161–7165.
[8] M. Feroci, M. Orsini, L. Palombi, L. Rossi, A. Inesi,
Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 2029–2036.
[9] M. Feroci, M. Orsini, L. Rossi, G. Sotgiu, A. Inesi,
ExperimentalSection
General Procedure for Electrochemically Promoted
Diastereoselective Synthesis of b-Lactams
A
constant current electrolysis was carried out (I=
75 mAcmÀ2) in an MeCN-Et4NPF6 0.1 mol dmÀ3 (20 cm3)
solution as catholyte (anolyte: 5 cm3), at 08C, under an
argon atmosphere, in a divided glass cell separated through
a porous glass plug filled up with a layer of agar gel (i.e.,
methyl cellulose 0.5% vol dissolved in DMF-Et4NClO4 1.0
mol dmÀ3); Pt spirals (apparent areas 0.8 cm2) were used
both as cathode and anode. After 193 C were passed, the
current was switched off and amide 1 (1 mmol) was added
to the catholyte and the solution was allowed to stand under
stirring at 08C for 3 h. The solvent was then evaporated
under reduced pressure and the residue extracted with di-
ethyl ether (330 cm3). The extracts were analyzed by thin
layer chromatography, GC-MS and 1H NMR; all products
were purified by flash chromatography, using n-hexane-ethyl
acetate 95:5 to 7:3 as eluent. The two b-lactams produced
are named b1 and b2, b1 being the first isomer reported in
the dr in Table 1 and Table 2, and b2 the second one.
Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 5540–5547.
[10] J. H. P. Utley, M. F. Nielsen, in: Organic Electrochemis-
try, 4th edn., (Eds.: H. Lund, O. Hammerich), Marcel
Dekker, New York, 2001, pp 1227–1257.
[11] M. Feroci, M. Orsini, G. Sotgiu, L. Rossi, A. Inesi, J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7795–7798 and references cited
therein.
[12] I. Ojima, S. Suga, R. Abe, Chem. Lett. 1980, 853–856.
[13] a) R. C. Thomas, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5239–
5242; b) J. Aszodi, A. Bonnet, G. Teutsch, Tetrahedron
1990, 46, 1579–1586; c) S. G. Davies, D. R. Fenwick,
Chem. Commun. 1997, 565–566.
[14] D. A. Evans, E. B. Sjogren, Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
3783–3786 and 3787–3790.
[15] Electrolyses carried out at
a lower temperature
Acknowledgements
(À208C) led to lower chemical yields in b-lactams, with
no improvement in the dr.
The author thanks PRIN 2006, MIUR and CNR (Rome) for
financial support.
[16] An increase in the number of Faradays per mol had no
effect, see ref.[1]
[17] F. M. Cordero, M. Salvati, F. Pisaneschi, A. Brandi,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2205–2213.
[18] G. Gerona-Navarro, M. A. Bonache, R. Herranz, M. T.
Garcꢂa-Lꢃpez, R. Gonzµlez-MuÇiz, J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 3538–3547.
[19] The low yield in cis-b-lactam 2f can be due both to the
high steric hindrance of this chiral auxiliary and to the
fact that under these experimental conditions part of
the auxiliary is removed (either from starting amide 1f
or from product 2f). In fact, from the cathodic solution
Oppolzerꢁs camphor sultam has been isolated.
[20] N. Miyachi, F. Kanda, M. Shibasaki, J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 3511–3513.
References
[1] Part 1: M. Feroci, J. Lessard, M. Orsini, A. Inesi, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8517–8519.
[2] a) W. Dürckheimer, J. Blumbach, R. Lattrell, K. H.
Scheunemann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24,
180–202; b) G. S. Singh, Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7631–
7649.
[3] A. R. A. S. Deshmukh, B. M. Bhawal, D. Krishnaswa-
my, V. V. Govande, B. A. Shinkre, A. Jayanthi, Curr.
Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1889–1920.
[4] a) D. A. Hart, D.-C. Ha, Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1447–
1465; b) C. Palomo, J. M. Aizpurua, I. Ganboa, M.
Oiarbide, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3223–3235.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2177 – 2181
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2181