binding, H atom abstraction and subsequent oxidative
transformation of the nucleic acid substrates. Accordingly,
the design of bleomycin congeners with altered and improved
properties requires a systematic approach and significant
effort. Several groups have worked to elucidate the relation-
ship between chemical structure and functions of BLM by
the use of (semi)synthetic approaches.5 An important mile-
stone in efforts to prepare BLMs with altered properties in
nucleic acid binding and degradation was realized with the
solid-phase synthesis of BLM congeners.6 In addition to
greatly facilitating the preparation of single BLMs, the
analogues could be prepared on solid supports compatible
with on-bead assay of the fully deprotected BLMs.6 Solid-
phase synthesis has also permitted the elaboration of a
combinatorial library of 108 BLM analogues,7 the properties
of which have recently been described.8 The library contained
potent (deglyco)BLM analogues that cleave DNA to a greater
extent than the corresponding parent (deglyco)BLM. In
addition, some BLM analogues in the library exhibited an
altered selectivity of DNA binding and cleavage.8 It is
anticipated that larger libraries may afford access to bleo-
mycin congeners exhibiting potentially useful properties, e.g.,
the ability to cleave individual cellular RNAs specifically.
While the synthesis of BLM libraries on solid supports is
readily accomplished and the elaborated BLMs can be
assayed for DNA cleavage while still attached to the
synthesis beads, there is a key unresolved issue for the
evaluation of larger BLM libraries. The library whose
synthesis and evaluation has been described7,8 was a parallel
library, i.e., containing compounds in individual containers.
While this strategy has important advantages, it also requires
that each of the several assays employed for characterization
of the new analogues be carried out individually on each
member of the library.
To facilitate the evaluation of much larger numbers of
BLM analogues, it is anticipated that future studies may
involve mix-and-split libraries.9 This would result in a large
number of beads, each containing multiple copies of a single
BLM congener. Such libraries can be assayed en masse, e.g.,
by the use of appropriate molecular beacons, potentially
permitting visual identification of beads containing BLM
analogues that are particularly proficient in a specific assay.
We previously described a DNA molecular beacon that can
be used for this purpose.10
The molecular beacon initially described employed fluo-
rescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Kinetics10 and
visualization6b,c of BLM-mediated DNA cleavage were
achieved using a 16-nucleotide (nt) hairpin DNA (5′-
CGCT3A7GCG-3′) having a fluorescence-quencher pair at
the 5′- and 3′-ends.10 While this oligonucleotide permitted
the characterization of individual BLMs, it was not cleaved
with an efficiency comparable to unmodified DNA,10 owing
presumably to the interaction of the attached fluorescein or
dabcyl moieties with the sites on the DNA-substrate cleaved
by BLM. Thus, the characterization of libraries using this
beacon may be idiosyncratic, rather than reflecting the
intrinsic properties of individual BLM analogues.
Presently, we report the site-specific incorporation of a
fluorescent nucleobase (Nf) into 16-nt hairpin DNAs at BLM
cleavage sites (hairpin DNA-Nf) and the strong enhancement
in fluorescence caused by BLM-mediated DNA strand
scission. Several types of Nf have been incorporated into
DNA as probes of nucleic acid structure, dynamics, and
interactions.11,12 To detect cleavage of DNA by BLM based
on the use of a DNA containing a fluorescent nucleobase,
we focused on the position of insertion and selection of Nf.
In our previous study on the cleavage of a 16-nt hairpin
DNA, it was found that cleavage occurred at cytidine15 for
Fe(II)·BLM.10 As regards the choice of Nf, we sought a
nucleobase having a compact ring structure because a larger
fluorophore-nucleobase13 or fluorophore-linked base14 seemed
more likely to affect the sequence recognition of BLM due
to steric effects. Certain benzo[g]quinazoline heterocycles
have exhibited strong fluorescence emission with favorable
quantum yields in buffered aqueous solution at neutral pH.15
(4) (a) Abraham, A. T.; Lin, J.-J.; Newton, D. L.; Rybak, S.; Hecht,
S. M. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 45. (b) Tao, Z.-F.; Konishi, K.; Keith, G.;
Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14806.
(5) (a) Kittaka, A.; Sugano, Y.; Otsuka, M.; Ohno, M. Tetrahedron 1988,
44, 2811. (b) Kittaka, A.; Sugano, Y.; Otsuka, M.; Ohno, M. Tetrahedron
1988, 44, 2821. (c) Hamamichi, N.; Natrajan, A.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 6278. (d) Boger, D. L.; Menezes, R. F.; Honda, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 273. (e) Kane, S.; Natrajan, A.; Hecht,
S. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 10899. (f) Boger, D. L.; Teramoto, S.;
Honda, T.; Zhou, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7338. (g) Boger, D. L.;
Teramoto, S.; Zhou, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7344. (h) Boger, D. L.;
Ramsey, T. M.; Cai, H.; Hoehn, S. T.; Kozarich, J. W.; Stubbe, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 53. (i) Boger, D. L.; Ramsey, T. M.; Cai, H.; Hoehn,
S. T.; Stubbe, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9139. (j) Boger, D. L.;
Menezes, R. F.; Cai, H.; Hoehn, S. T.; Stubbe, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 9149. (k) Katano, K.; An, H.; Aoyagi, Y.; Overhand, M.; Sucheck,
S. J.; Stevens, W. C.; Hess, C. D.; Zhou, X.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 11285. (l) Zuber, G.; Quada, J. C.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9368. (m) Zou, Y.; Fahmi, N. E.; Vialas, C.; Miller,
G. M.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9476.
(9) Geysen, H. M.; Schoenen, F.; Wagner, D.; Wagner, R. Nat. ReV.
Drug Dis. 2003, 2, 222.
(10) Hashimoto, S.; Wang, B.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7437.
(11) Marti, A.; Jockusch, S.; Li, Z.; Ju, J.; Turro, N. J. Nucleic Acids
Res. 2006, 34, e50
.
(12) (a) Wojczewski, C.; Stolze, K.; Engels, J. W. Synlett. 1999, 1667.
(b) Hawkins, M. E. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 34, 257. (c) Rist, M. J.;
Marino, J. P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002, 6, 775. (d) Okamoto, A.; Saito, Y.;
Saito, I. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. ReV. 2005, 6, 108. (e)
Tor, Y. Ed. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3415
.
(13) (a) Coleman, R. S.; Madaras, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5700.
(b) Matray, T. J.; Kool, E. T. Nature 1999, 399, 704. (c) Strassler, C.; Davis,
N. E.; Kool, E. T. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 2160.
(6) (a) Leitheiser, C. J.; Rishel, M. J.; Wu, X.; Hecht, S. M. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3397. (b) Tao, Z.-F.; Leitheiser, C. J.; Smith, K. L.; Hashimoto,
S.; Hecht, S. M. Bioconjugate Chem. 2002, 13, 426. (c) Smith, K. L.; Tao,
Z.-F.; Hashimoto, S.; Leitheiser, C. J.; Wu, X.; Hecht, S. M. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 1079. (d) Thomas, C. J.; Chizhov, A. O.; Leitheiser, C. J.; Rishel,
M. J.; Konishi, K.; Tao, Z.-F.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
12926.
(14) (a) Netzel, T. L.; Zhao, M.; Nafisik, K.; Headrick, J.; Sigman, M. S.;
Eaton, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9119. (b) Seela, F.; Zulauf, M.;
Sauer, M.; Deimel, M. HelV. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 910. (c) Kerr, C. E.;
Mitchell, C. D.; Headrick, J.; Eaton, B. E.; Netzel, T. L J. Phys. Chem. B
2000, 104, 1637. (d) Seela, F.; Feiling, E.; Gross, J.; Hillenkamp, F.;
Ramzaeva, N.; Rosemeyer, H.; Zulauf, M. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 86, 269.
(e) Hurley, D. J.; Seaman, S. E.; Mazura, J. C.; Tor, Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
2305. (f) McKeen, C. M.; Brown, L. J.; Nicol, J. T.; Mellor, J. M.; Brown,
T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 2267.
(7) (a) Leitheiser, C. J.; Smith, K. L.; Rishel, M. J.; Hashimoto, S.;
Konishi, K.; Thomas, C. J.; Li, C.; McCormick, M. M.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8218. (b) Leitheiser, C. J.; Hecht, S. M. Curr. Opin.
Drug DiscoVery DeV. 2003, 6, 827.
(8) Ma, Q.; Xu, Z.; Schroeder, B. R.; Sun, W.; Wei, F.; Hashimoto, S.;
Konishi, K.; Leitheiser, C. J.; Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
12439.
(15) (a) Godde, F.; Toulme, J. J.; Moreau, S. Biochemistry 1998, 37,
13765. (b) Godde, F.; Toulme, J. J.; Moreau, S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000,
28, 2977.
2128
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008